Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

By Munashe Kwangwari • Published 55 mins ago • Updated 10 mins ago​


Tensions continue to escalate in and outside Norfolk Superior Court over the Karen Read murder trial.

It's the beginning of the end of the trial, as the defense looks to wrap their case this week.

Read's defense team told NBC10 Boston they only have three witnesses left to call, and the expectation is they could rest their case by mid-week.
 

Updated: 9:37 AM EDT Jun 24, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 9:32 a.m. "All of these marks are consistent with scratches marks," Sheridan says. Says the injury near the elbow is the most likely candidate for a bite mark.
  • 9:30 a.m. Sheridan says his initial reaction is that these arms injuries are likely the result of a dog using its claws and possibly its teeth, but he says "not 100 percent sure."
  • 9:27 a.m. Little re-asks the question. Sheridan says "if you mean be struck in that part of the arm," I would say no. "You would at least expect bruising."
  • 9:23 a.m. Sheridan describes the injuries to O'Keefe's arms as "friction injuries", says they were inflicted before he died.
  • 9:15 a.m. Sheridan is the former chief medical examiner of San Bernardino County in southern California. He's soft-spoken and defense attorney Elizabeth reminds him to keep his voice up so jurors can hear.
  • 9:05 a.m. Next defense witness: Dr. Frank Sheridan, retired doctor with specialty in forensic pathology
  • Day 29 of testimony. The prosecution rested on Fri. The defense called 3 witnesses. Today we might hear from 2 independent experts hired by the FBI as part of a fed investigation. They determined O'Keefe's injuries were likely not caused by vehicle strike.
 

Updated: 9:37 AM EDT Jun 24, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 9: 55 a.m. "They can be. They could be," Sherdian says when asked if O'Keefe's injuries are consistent with a fight.
  • 9:52 a.m. "If there's a fall involved here, it would be on a hard surface," Sherdian. "Grass is too soft," he says.
  • 9:50 a.m. Sheridan says the injury to the back of O'Keefe's head was likely the cause of death. Noted extensive bruising, fracture that started at the point of impact, and brain contusions and bleeding.
  • 9:45 a.m. Little demonstrates how the prosecution says O'Keefe was standing and asks if his injuries are consistent with being hit by a vehicle at 24 mph. He says no.
  • 9:35 a.m. During sidebar, the judge is consulting a thick book at the bench. It seems she might be discussing a point of law with the attorneys.
 

Updated: 9:37 AM EDT Jun 24, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 10:10 a.m. Sheridan says he was not aware of photos of a bite mark caused by the Alberts' dog, Chloe. Says he didn't know about the plastic pieces found in O'Keefe's clothing, nor that O'Keefe's DNA was found on taillight.
  • 10:04 a.m. Lally asks if it's normal to see animal attack injuries on one side of the body. Sheridan says he recalls a couple of cases where the injuries were limited to one part of the body.
  • 10:02 a.m. Sheridan agrees that O'Keefe had no injuries to his left arm and left leg. Sheridan says he agrees with the finding of the medical examiner and the neuropathologist who testified for the prosecution.
  • 10 a.m. Little concludes direct examination. Prosecutor Adam Lally begins cross examination of Sheridan.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,080
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom