Well, eye-witness accounts need to correlate with other info and I think in both cases, they do.
In Kyron's case, I don't know enough about those particular eye-witness accounts to evaluate them. I don't even know the source of that info. I mean, I understand that it comes from the biological mother but that's second-hand.
I have to say, I'm very surprised and actually, disappointed that you don't question the info surrounding that case. It's certainly not what I'm used to seeing from you.
As for France, I have no idea what you're talking about, lol!
Newer/new case. Little 2 year old went missing in France.
As for Kyron, I think you know I am far from the only one who feels that way about the stepmother, the majority does but believe me I don't just go with the majority. I have bucked other's opinion and been the only one in some cases to believe what I decide is my opinion. There's been a few cases where I believed a missing person went missing of their own volition and it was right.
As I said today in the LISK case not long ago and have said in other threads over time, as years pass with cases and such, I don't always remember what brought me to my opinion or every detail as I stuff in so many, but I know how I do it and that I don't do it out of the gate ever UNLESS on rare occasion it is just so obvious and even then I wait to see quite often.
I try to start at zero if one thinks of a thermometer. Negative degrees are guilt, positive ones innocent or something like that.
OR maybe like three strikes and you are out with me. Meaning coincidences, having to explain too many things or just things that outright point to the person and no one else, etc. LIES. Etc. One thing well okay. Two things and the needle moves from zero... Three things and that's weighted towards guilt. And in some cases more piles on. A solid alibi it will go back towards not guilty. And so forth.
What you don't understand maybe is that doesn't mean it would be enough for me to convict them as a juror or that it is evidence even that could be used or be enough on its own. It's my opinion.
I think our differences are with some cases that you are doing what a juror is supposed to and should do. I get that but this is discussion and opinion and not a jury trial.
I also think you find excuses for too much where I do the opposite. When I started following cases online and discussing, I would sometimes come up with thoughts of what could have happened that really excused too much and even would go ab it outside the box and I came to realize I had to make things fit to find innocence in some of them or like many often thought a child could have been abducted by a stranger just to leave open the possibility and think of all. Ahother thing I almost never do as many do these days is instantly jump to trafficking.
If there are too many coincidences or things to be explained away I have come to not believe in too many coincidences. The odds are up there with winning the Powerball. Where were you? At work. The next day. Well someone saw you at the mall. Oh, I forgot about that, I was at the mall. Then what did you buy there? A shirt. The next day, we found video it was bleach. Oh yeah, now I remember. Simple made up example but... I could go on.
I'd also add that my meter can go the other direction after moving in one direction.
That one case where another woman took the woman's newborn and everyone online suspected her fiance, I never went there or jumped on that ship.
With Kyron and I think another one was where the girlfriend was younger than dad and her name was Missy, maybe was the babysitter first drawing a blank you and I are the exact opposite on that one as well. Bevers? I have stuffed way too many cases in through the years. But again it is an opinion, I'm not a juror. And yes, most of the reaqsons wouldn't be enough for sure to convict or so LE and prosecutors worry and is likely why they haven't been charged but it doesn't mean it isn't the way the road goes and arrows point or logic does.
And I basically never go to 100 percent but have said I am 99.9 in some cases with my opinion but I will change it if then see reason to or other evidence, etc. It rarely happens. I'm not the judge and I'm not the jury and if I was, I'd look at it the way they are supposed to. Honestly I don't want to be either. I'm simply discussing and forming an opinion and sharing it.
I see little in Kyron's case that indicates anyone but the stepmother and plenty that does.
For me, add to it that it is so rare it is someone other than someone close to them. Does it happen? Of course. Parents are always looked at and innocent ones generally happy to cooperate and they tell the truth as their goal is to be cleared and get their child found. and for LE to get on it as soon as possible.
Polygraphs like other subjects could be debated for eons but she failed them.
There are all these little things as well. Just too much that she can't explain away. I mean I guess we can believe some other person walked Kryon out of the school with no one noticing and he went willingly and easly but not a single soul saw them where he was seen with her. And more.
We do agree that CAMERAS would have made a huge difference in that case.
Not arguing or trying to offend just explaining some of why I think we differ and that again, I am not a juror convicting the person. It is an opinion. First key thing is NEVER lie. And they do. Tell the truth as best you know it because changing your story is key. More than once? Oh boy.
Sorry to go on. I needed to get my mind off some other things and haven't been able to or focus so I went to town with this one. Not at you of course. Was overdue for a LONG one and some will be happy it wasn't a food post lol