LIBBY GERMAN & ABBY WILLIAMS: Indiana vs. Richard Allen for 2017 murder of two Delphi girls *GUILTY*

On February 14, 2017, the bodies of Abigail Williams and Liberty German were discovered near the Monon High Bridge Trail, which is part of the Delphi Historic Trails in Delphi, Indiana, United States, after the young girls had disappeared from the same trail the previous day. The murders have received significant media coverage because a photo and audio recording of an individual believed to be the girls' murderer was found on German's smartphone. Despite the audio and video recordings of the suspect that have been circulated and the more than 26,000 tips that police have received, no arrest in the case has been made.[1][2][3]

1581272168478.png

Police have not publicly stated nor released details of how the girls were murdered.[6] As early as February 15, 2017, Indiana State Police began circulating a still image of an individual reportedly seen on the Monon High Bridge Trail near where the two friends were slain; the grainy photograph appearing to capture a Caucasian male, with hands in pockets, walking on the rail bridge, head down, toward the girls.[4] A few days later, the person in the photograph was named the prime suspect in the double-homicide.[5]

On February 22, law enforcement released an audio recording where the voice of the assailant,[7] though in some degree muffled, is heard to say, "Down the hill." It was at this news conference that officials credited the source of the audio and imagery to German's smartphone, and, further, regarded her as a hero for having had the uncanny foresight and fortitude to record the exchange in secret. Police indicated that additional evidence from the phone had been secured, but that they did not release it so as not to "compromise any future trial." By this time, the reward offered in the case was set at $41,000.[5]


1581272119747.png


 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is an addition to the narrative in the link I posted in post 9118 from day 17. So i will add it below.


POOL REPORTER’S TRANSCRIPTION OF A COURT EXHIBIT.​

The following is a direct transcription of an exhibit shown to the media today after court adjourned. It is a psych evaluation of Richard Allen prepared by Dr. John Martin on June 20, 2023.

“This morning the patient was interviewed in an interview cell. He had been wearing a uniform when he was taken to the cell but chose to take it off and was in a tee shirt and boxers. Several contusions on his face that had been self-induced are no longer as prominent. Eye contact was poor. he spoke very softly but also very briefly. He kept asking for Dr. Wala. He was coherent and spoke without loose associations or flight of ideas. He was oriented to person, place, time of day and situation. He has a constricted (ed. note, difficult to read this word.) affect. He said that he had suicidal ideations. He did not want to talk too much. What he did talk about was his concern for his wife. He said that he wanted to apologize to the families of his victims. He is eating his meals. He is keeping himself clean. A renew of the logs shows that he is getting an adequate amount of sleep and is eating most of his meals. He has been meeting with Dr. Wala for therapy sessions and is due to see her in a few minutes. He was not consistent in taking his oral medications and so it was discontinued. He will continue on Prozac. I am discontinuing the Haldol Decanoate today. In general he is much improved and does not appear to be psychotic at the present time. He claims to be suicidal. He is continued on suicide watch. He will be interviewed again in two weeks.” -End of transcription.

2:37 P.M. REMAINING REBUTTAL WITNESSES TESTIFY.​

At 1:16 p.m., Judge Gull returns to the court room. The jury enters shortly after.

Defense attorney Brad Rozzi begins cross-examination of Dr. John Martin, a license psychiatrist. Rozzi tells the jury that Dr. Martin does not have a traditional bachelor’s degree from and American university. Rozzi says Martin was terminated from a position in Florida. He says Martin was involved with lawsuits with a person that was in solitary confinement.

Prosecutor Stacey Diener calls for a sidebar and Judge Gull tells Rozzi to “move on.”

Martin tells the jury he went to Westville because there was a 200 to 250 case backlog. Rozzi describes SMI, or severe mental illness. Diener objects. Martin says solitary can cause or exaggerate mental illness.

Martin tells the jury that Allen could “possibly” move in and out of psychosis. He says that some of the meetings happened with Allen by speaking through his cell door. He says he did not watch camcorder or in-cell videos of Allen.

Martin said that on April 13, 2023, Allen was “very psychotic.” He said he agreed that Allen suffered from major depressive disorder and that him believing the was unfairly incarcerated could make the depression worse.

Martin tells the jury that he agrees that he reported being concerned when Allen met with his lawyers. He says Allen told Dr. Wala that he thought one of his lawyers was a good cop and the other was a bad cop.

Martin says he has treated a pre-trial detainee in prison that had no criminal history before. Rozzi shows Martin his previous deposition and Martin agrees that he earlier said he had not treated a pre-trial detainee in a prison before.

Martin agrees that Allen’s situation was unique to him.

He tells the jury about working on a computer off-site at times, Diener objects to this testimony.

Martin describes an occasion where he administered medication to an inmate from Michigan City in Westville.

He says he did not ask Allen if he had lawyers when he met with him in Nov. of 2022. Martin says that meeting was an interview and not a formal psychiatric visit. He says in a report from that same month that Allen had used alcohol socially.

Martin tells the jury that it would be more confusing for someone in solitary if they had not done something wrong.

Rozzi asks to play the video from June 20, 2023 in which Allen said he wanted to apologize to the families.

Diener asks to review. The video is played. The reporter in the court room cannot see the screen and reports that Kathy Allen looks away.

Gull calls for a sidebar in the middle of the video playing. Diener begins again.

Martin says his conversation with Allen on that day was an interview and that he was oriented. (Ed. note “in control of his faculties.”) He says Allen’s statement about apologizing to the families was spontaneous. Martin says he does not remember if the interaction was recorded.

Martin tells the jury that he does not know why Allen’s actions on June 20, 2023 seem different than what he had recorded but that he does not question his own records. He says he believes that Allen had returned to baseline by May 2, 2023.

He says he continued haldol after Allen was no longer in psychosis because he did not want it to ‘re-occur.’ he says he never again had to have an emergency meeting for Allen after the first meeting in April of 2023.

At 2:10 p.m. Rozzi begins again. Martin tells the jury there was not anything to communicate that Allen couldn’t have communicated spontaneously on June 6, 2023.

At 2:13 p.m. the jury asked questions:

  1. Did the oral haldol continue after June 20, 2023? Martin answers yes.
  2. What time did you meet with Allen on June 20, 2023? Martin says early in the morning.
  3. Based on the video, could this presentation be consistent with faking? Martin says no.
  4. Is it possible for Allen to slip in and out of psychosis in a 24-hour period? Martin says yes
At 2:15 p.m. the state says it has no other rebuttal witnesses. Gull tells the jury “you have now heard all arguments in this case.”

The jury exits the court room at 2:16 p.m. Defense attorney Andrew Baldwin revisits jury instructions wanting to add a statement of confessions. The state objects. The defense withdraws the request.

Baldwin again brings up an offer of proof involving a man named Elvis Fields, who is connected to the defense’s Odinism defense. The state says this does not matter because the defense has rested.

Baldwin says he wants Fields addressed because he did not respond to a subpoena. Judge Gull says she already ruled he would not testify.

Court is in recess at 2:27 p.m.

12:43 P.M.: RICHARD ALLEN’S PSYCHOSIS​

At 10:25 a.m., court went back into session and both sides approached the bench — the jury had not returned to the courtroom.

At 10:52 a.m., court went back into session and the prosecution said their witness was ready to testify.

The jury was seated at 11 a.m.

Diener called their witness, Breann Wilber to the stand.

Diener asked Wilber if she had a Snapchat photo of the Freedom Bridge taken on Feb. 13, 2017.

Wilber said she did. The photo was introduced as state’s exhibit #318.

Defense attorney Andrew Baldwin asked when Wilber gave Diener the bridge photo.

Wilber said she didn’t know exactly when she supplied the photo, but it was before her testimony earlier in the trial.

The photo, taken in a sequence with others, indicates Wilber arrived at the bridge at 12:25 p.m., according to News 8’s Kyla Russell.

Wilber said she walked from Freedom Bridge to the Monon High Bridge but did not see “Bridge Guy” or Abby and Libby on her walk.

Baldwin said Wilber had a good memory and asked her about remembering details of Feb. 13, 2017.

Diener interjected and said Wilber was interviewed shortly after the murders.

A short time later, Wilber was allowed to step down.

Next to testify is Brian Harshman, the Westville correctional officer who listened to Allen’s phone calls from jail.

He confirmed that Richard Allen has been in a one-man cell at Westville, Wabash, and Cass County.

Harshman said that Allen has a chair in his cell in Cass County and that the cell is bigger than the one at Westville was.

He told the court that there is less human interaction in Cass County than in Westville and that Allen has no “neighbors.”

Harshman also said that Richard Allen threatened the staff at Cass County.

Dr. John Martin, a licensed psychiatrist with 40+ years of experience in corrections, was next to testify.

Martin said he started working at Westville as third-party contractor in Feb. 2022 and began seeing Allen that November.

“He was stable. He had a history of depression but did not seem depressed,” Martin told the court.

Three weeks later, the doctor said, Allen seemed “fine” again. When they met on Nov. 24, 2023, sixteen days after their first session, Allen signed a consent form for Prozac.

He told the court he would prescribe Allen medication and knew Allen was on Prozac before arriving at Westville. He said he also had a record of when Allen took his medication because staff members would initial a certain log if he was successful.

Martin said he would type up notes on his computer after meeting with Allen and that the computer system was secure — no one else had access.

At this point, the state introduced two exhibits, including records of medications ordered for Richard Allen and medication logs signed by staff.

Martin said Allen was kept in “what could be referred to as solitary confinement; others say ‘one man cell.’”

He added that solitary confinement has a “punitive reason,” while a one-man cell does not.

“Mr. Allen had not done anything wrong, and yet he was being treated as though he had, or at least that’s what he could have felt,” Martin told the court.

He said that the prison had a responsibility to keep him safe and there were “many meetings” to ‘make life more comfortable” for Allen.

Martin said he knew Allen had suicide companions and had expressed suicidal interests. He also knew that Allen was sometimes moved to be seen by himself or Dr. Wala.

He testified that he saw Allen again in April 2023 after he got a “phone call that prompted him to visit Allen unplanned.”

Martin said he saw Allen lying naked on a cell mattress with feces smeared on his body.

He told prison staff he needed to see Allen and “they practically dragged him” to a shower cell and gave him a gown, Martin recalled.

Martin said it was at this point he decided Allen was “psychotic” and that in order to treat Allen’s psychosis, he had to put him on an antipsychotic medication.

Martin said he wanted to put Allen on Haldol (Haloperidol), an antipsychotic drug commonly used to treat schizophrenia, but Allen’s mental state was such that he could not consent to treatment.

In order to give him Haldol injections without consent, Martin called Dr. Hayes, a regional psychologist with his contractor, asked for an emergency meeting with 3 psychologists.

Martin said all three psychologists agreed Richard Allen was psychotic and he proceeded with the first treatment on April 14, 2023.

He testified that he gave Allen 5 milligrams of short-acting Haldol and that the maximum dose is 100 mg.

Martin said he administered such a small dose because he wanted to make sure Allen didn’t have a reaction.

After that, Allen was injected with a 15 mg dose of long-acting Haldol one every four weeks, with the first dose administered on April 18, 2023.

Martin said he saw Allen one week later and that Allen was “still psychotic” but there was “some improvement.”

He described the “improvement” as there being no evidence of smearing feces and that Allen would recognize him but he did not know the date.

Martin told the court that Allen knew he was in prison and asked for his wife and Taco Bell. There was also improvement in Allen’s coherence, eating and sleeping.

He said that he believed April 13 was the height of Allen’s psychosis.

Martin said he saw Allen several times in May, and each time, Allen was “coherent” and there was “no evidence” of psychosis By the end of the month, Allen was eating meals and had spoken to his wife.

On June 20, Allen had gone seven weeks without showing signs of psychosis and Martin decided to stop the Haldol injections.

Martin said Allen told him that day, “I would like to apologize to the families of my victims.”

He told the court Allen was “not psychotic” at the time of the statement.

The state finished its questions at 12:25 p.m. and the court adjourned for lunch until 1:15 p.m.
 
Last edited:
LOL RA didnt trust his lawyers.

From the above post.

"He says Allen told Dr. Wala that he thought one of his lawyers was a good cop and the other was a bad cop."

Also details regarding Haldol from Wiki.


Haloperidol, sold under the brand name Haldol among others, is a typical antipsychotic medication.[9] Haloperidol is used in the treatment of schizophrenia, tics in Tourette syndrome, mania in bipolar disorder, delirium, agitation, acute psychosis, and hallucinations from alcohol withdrawal.[9][10][11] It may be used by mouth or injection into a muscle or a vein.[9] Haloperidol typically works within 30 to 60 minutes.[9] A long-acting formulation may be used as an injection every four weeks for people with schizophrenia or related illnesses, who either forget or refuse to take the medication by mouth.[9]
 
Last edited:
Day 18 - closing arguments 2.5 hours maximum each. Nothing updated so far. I will come back to check and copy paste the remarks in a few hours.

Mcleland's is in. Just under an hour - see below link. The court reporting before the closing arguments are shown at the bottom.

The D were only about an hour too. Will add that when it shows up in the link. Prosecution rebuttal after lunch.




Home / News / Crime Watch 8 / Delphi Murders

Delphi Murders trial: Day 18 live blog​


At 1:15 p.m. jury instructions began.

Judge Gull says the alternate jurors will be in the deliberation room, be engaged but will not participate. She says their decision must be beyond a reasonable doubt. She says the burden is on the state to prove that.

Gull says it is “not beyond all possible doubt.” She says that defendants are not convicted on suspicion. She tells the jury their decision must be unanimous.

She tells them if they are left with two interpretations, they must choose one that sides with innocence. She says they can take into account any bias the witness may have. She said they should believe the witness until they cannot with a good reason.

Gull says nothing she said during the trial should be considered evidence. She says there are no transcripts of the witnesses. She says there is nothing that was not admitted.

Gull tells the jury that during deliberation they must consult with reason. She says bailiffs will be outside the deliberation room. She tells them they cannot leave unless the full group is present. She says there is no mention of sentencing in the paperwork.

Gull says a foreperson will be chosen and will sign the verdict. Gull says the bailiffs took an oath that they will not communicate.

At 1:24 p.m. the jury leaves with instructions.

Judge Gull now lays out expectations for those outside the deliberation room. She says the attorneys need to be within 5 minutes of the court room. She says if the jury needs to see evidence, all attorneys will be invited.

Gull says that Allen will be brought in if the jury requests.

She says the jury will pick a foreperson. She says the jury will not deliberate on Sundays.

She says the jury will deliberate from nine a.m. to four p.m. daily, unless at 4 p.m. they choose to stay and deliberate longer. She says the jury will not deliberate on Sundays.

Court is off the record at 1:27 p.m. on November 7, 2024.


Defence rebuttal.

Court is back in session at 1:07 p.m.

McLeland begins his rebuttal to the defense’s closing argument.

He says it’s been a long 3 or 4 weeks, that now it is time to hand the case over to the jurors. He tells them “you’re in the driver’s seat.” “I’m not up here to tell you how to feel.”

McLeland says the defense did not back up their claims, that the prosecution has witnesses on the trail that day and that they simply reaffirm that Allen was there.

He tells the jury that witnesses after the murders on the high bridge do not matter.

McLeland points at Allen and says he used a gun to scare them. He says Libby had a “blood outline” of a tear on her face.

He tells the jury that Oberg’s testing was verified, that it links Allen to the crimes.

News 8’s Kyla Russell says Allen is extremely engaged and looking at Baldwin with disbelief.

McLeland says “words matter, why don’t Allen’s words matter?”

He says there are two victims in the case, Abby and Libby. He says “they are Allen’s victims. But they aren’t just victims, they are heroes.”

McLeland says “Libby said someday she is going to help police solve crimes, that’s exactly what she did.”

McLeland ends his rebuttal.


At 10:24 a.m. court is back in session and defense attorney Brad Rozzi begins his closing argument.

Rozzi tells the jury they’ve been there for almost a month and have seen 17 days of evidence. “The defense trusts that what you’ve heard over the last several weeks.”

Rozzi says there are four main themes:

  1. Broken timeline.
  2. Bumbled ballistics.
  3. False confessions.
  4. Digital forensics.
Rozzi tells the jury that the state has presented a theme of “what they don’t want you to hear, is what we had to tell you.” He says, “we had to do their job.”

Rozzi expands on that by saying that the state refused to have height analysis done on Bridge Guy. He says hours of video interviews from 2017 were lost. Rozzi tells the jury the state had to look at a detail about the Ford Focus after doing a BMV search in the middle of the trial after a juror asked about it. He said the juror asked if it was the only 2016 black Ford Focus registered in 2017.

Rozzi begins to describe witness testimony, saying that Brad Heath said he saw an unusual man that day. He said the Betsy Blair testimony didn’t tell the whole story.

Rozzi says “I have to take a breath before I talk about here,” when referring to Sarah Carbaugh.

He says Carbaugh conflated “muddy” with “bloody.” He tells the jury they may discount a witness, calling it “credible dubiosity.” He says the jury that they can discredit Carbaugh.

Rozzi says the prosecution did not tell them about David McCain, Shelby Hicks or Cheyenne Mill because it “doesn’t fit their narrative.”

Rozzi tells the jury the prosecution didn’t include Allen’s timeline regarding how he got to the bridge. Allen nods his head in agreement in the court room.

Rozzi suggests to the jury that they should use two pieces of evidence to exercise common sense; the two interviews from Oct. 13 and 26, 2022.

Rozzi says that Brad Weber’s gun could not be excluded as the one that cycled the cartridge found at the scene.

Rozzi says Weber had sticks in his garage and the state did not mention that. He brings up Weber’s account changed from Feb. 13.

Rozzi talks about phone calls on April 3, 2023 that the state didn’t bring up at all.

Rozzi says the state did not offer up information on the FBI leaving the investigation. He says the sticks laid on the girls’ bodies were not collected.

Rozzi brings up the Westville videos of Allen. He says Allen was in solitary and without human interaction. He says the state only wants you to hear a few words.

Rozzi says the ‘magic bullet’ is the majority of the state’s case. He says the state just wants the jury to believe Oberg and ignore the state not bringing up photos. “Use your common sense,” he says.

Rozzi mentions Libby’s phone being plugged into an accessory was not brought up by the state. He shows the jury a phone timeline. “You should question their credibility,” Rozzi says, referring to the prosecution. He says the state was desperate to make an arrest.

Rozzi tells the jury that the Brad Weber van detail was only recently added this year. He says it took seven years for the hair and DNA testing to occur. Rozzi says that Allen’s Google searches have no proof that Allen actually made the searches. The searches are only registered to his email, he says.

Rozzi says the Google search information was forensic examiner Chris Cecil offering the jury “fast food.”

Rozzi tells the jury that the man who performed the autopsies on the girls, Dr. Roland Kohr, said in a deposition that there may have been more than one murder weapon, but now says it could be a box cutter. He says Kohr said this after meeting with the prosecution three time.

Rozzi tells the jury that they should consider that Carbaugh didn’t see anything.

He says the state has only a few key moments in their timeline:

  1. Feb 13. at 2:13 p.m., the Bridge Guy video.
  2. Feb 13 at 3:56 p.m., Carbaugh sees man walking on 300N.
Rozzi calls Carbaugh’s testimony “worthless.”

He says Abby would have lived for 5-10 minute and could have screamed, but nobody heard any screaming.

Rozzi says the state ignored that there could have been more than one killer. He says he also ignored that someone could have accessed the bridge from the south side.

He says the state suggests the crime was ‘labor intensive’ and committed by a 5’5″ man, without a trace, in a short period of time.

Rozzi says “it is just implausible.”

Rozzi tells the jury Allen went to law enforcement after the murders in 2017 and was also cooperative in 2022.

He says Allen still cooperated after he knew he was a suspect.

Rozzi says “even through the face of lies, Allen stood strong.” He says Allen lived in the community and didn’t have a reason to leave because he didn’t do it.

Rozzi brings up the forensic examination Oberg did of the cartridge found at the scene. He says Oberg’s testing did not show “sufficient agreement” between the cartridge that was found and the cartridge that was tested.

He says the photos from the cartridge testing should be the main thing the jury is stressed by, because there isn’t agreement.

Rozzi says Oberg told them “you should just believe me.” He says the state did not have the cartridge re-examined because Oberg’s work was “so horrid.”

He tells the jury that Allen’s situation in this case is “unprecedented,” referring to Allen being in solitary confinement.

He says Allen was treated like a convicted murderer. Allen nods in agreement in the court room.

Rozzi tells the jury that Allen was “immediately placed on suicide watch, everyone would have a breakdown under those circumstances.”

He says Allen was in solitary confinement for 13 months. He asks “how much can one human endure?”

Rozzi says it was insulting that the state did not want the jury to see video of Allen in Westville. He says Allen was not faking it and even Dr. Wala and Dr. Martin said they weren’t sure he was faking it.

He says the Indiana Department of Correction’s medical standard was to keep Allen alive.

Rozzi tells the jury, “you should be insulted.”


Rozzi says Allen was having false memories during some of the confessions. He says the state lied about Libby’s phone. Rozzi says someone was using the phone between 5:45 p.m. and 10:32 p.m. on Feb. 13. He said someone plugged something into it during that time.

He says “there’s no explanation because the phone is right.”

Rozzi tells the jury there is no trace evidence that connects Allen to the crime scene. He said that Dr. Polly Westcott, a neuropsychologist, said that Dr. Wala’s notes read more like a story, despite Allen being psychotic and not coherent.

He says the state was desperate to make the sound in the Bridge Guy video the sound of a handgun racking.

Rozzi tells the jury there is a question as to if the girls’ bodies were at the scene during the evening of Feb. 13, 2017.

He says the Smith and Wesson cartridge found in the memory box is a very common brand.

Rozzi says Allen found God because he was in a cell alone with only a bible but that’s not why he confessed.

Rozzi tells the jury that there are five components for the jury to keep in mind:

  1. Nobody identified Allen as Bridge Guy.
  2. No digital data connects Allen to the crime.
  3. No clothing connects Allen.
  4. No DNA connects Allen.
  5. No trace material connects Allen.
Rozzi acknowledges the girls’ families. He says this has been a long journey.

Rozzi says “at the end of the day the state’s timeline has crumbled, the magic bullet is nothing more than a tragic bullet.”

Rozzi shows the jury a photo a rack, a medieval torture device. He shows a photo of a thumbscrew. He says these tools are not far from what Allen experienced in solitary confinement.

Rozzi says these tools are still used, they’ve just evolved.

Rozzi shows four photos of Allen in prison. In the photos he is covered in feces and being dragged while wearing a spit hood.

News 8’s Kyla Russell says while the photos are shown, Allen looks away. His wife Kathy is crying.

Rozzi says “rendering a verdict of guilt could be endorsing this behavior.”

Rozzi asks the jury to set Allen free.

He is finished at 12 p.m. after speaking for an hour ß 17 minutes.

12:10 P.M. THE DEFENSE HAS COMPLETED ITS CLOSING ARGUMENT, PROSECUTION TO GIVE REBUTTAL AFTER LUNCH BREAK.​

10:55 A.M. PROSECUTION BEGINS ITS CLOSING ARGUMENT.​

At 9:17 a.m. prosecutor Nick McLeland begins closing arguments.

He tells the jury “February 13th is a day Delphi will never forget.” He says the state has proven that Allen is Bridge Guy. He tells the jury “the State has done just that.”

McLeland talks about that day. Where Libby was the last time she talked to Becky Patty, Libby’s grandmother. He is showing the jury a Power Point with Libby and Abby’s Snapchat photo from Kelsi German’s car. He recounts the search Libby’s father made and how he called Becky Patty.

McLeland tells the jury about the search and that Brad Weber, the neighbors, let them look around his property. He says they did not look through the house at that time, however.

McLeland goes through the testimony of several people on the bridge and in the area that saw Bridge Guy, from Betsy Blair who saw the girls, to Sara Carbaugh who said she saw Bridge Guy “muddy and bloody.”

He says “that doesn’t happen around here,” referring to the murders. He describes the bodies being found and shows photos of the girls’ clothes in Deer Creek. He describes the crime scene being secured.

McLeland begins to talk about firearms and how officers in Carroll County carry 9mm handguns and not .40 cal. He says “remember that for later.”

He shows the crime scene and says “this is what they saw.” He says a phone was collected from under Abby’s shoe which was under her body. He says they collected a cartridge and shows it at the scene.

McLeland shows the jury a photo of Libby’s phone. He shows the Bridge Guy video from Feb. 13, 2017 at 2:13 p.m. He says “the video shows the moment they were forced down the hill by the guy in the video, Bridge Guy.”

“He forced them down the hill with a gun,” McLeland tells the jury.

He says Libby said in the video, “that be a gun.”

He shows the jury an enhanced version of the Bridge Guy video.

McLeland says law enforcement interviewed people on the bridge that day. He shows a photo a witness took of Freedom Bridge. He recounts Bre Wilber saying she saw a man on the trails “walking with a purpose.” He shows the jury Besty Blair’s Fitbit information. He talks about Sara Carbaugh seeing a man ‘muddy and bloody’ on 300N.

McLeland talks about Chris Cecil’s forensic examination of Libby’s phone, how he got health data from it. He says that data confirms when the girls were at the bridge. He says GPS shows where movement was at 2:32 p.m. and that there was no more movement after that.

He goes over the timeline with witnesses, when they arrived, where they went. He says Breann Wilber arrived at Freedom Bridge at 12:25 p.m. that day and walked to the high bridge. She took a photo at 1:26 p.m. at the bridge. He says she ran into Bridge Guy while walking back to Freedom Bridge.

McLeland tells the jury about Betsy Blair passing a camera at the Hoosier Harvestore, heading to the high bridge. He says Kelsi German’s car was also seen on that camera, passing it after she dropped the girls off. He says Blair saw a man on the bridge and passed Libby and Abby as they arrived on the bridge.

He says the Bridge Guy video was taken at 2:13 p.m. He tells the jury Libby’s phone stopped moving at 2:32 p.m. He says that Sara Carbaugh passed the Hoosier Harvestore camera at 3:56 p.m. and said she saw Bridge Guy and he was “muddy and bloody.”

McLeland says “if we can determine who Bridge Guy is, we can determine who killed Abby Williams and Liberty German.

McLeland moves ahead to 2022. He describes Kathy Shank finding the lead sheet regarding Richard Allen. He describes Shank taking the tip to Tony Liggett, a detective working on the investigation. He describes conservation officer Dan Dulin downloading a photo of Allen from the BMV.

McLeland says that it was determined that Allen’s car was the only 2016 black Ford Focus registered in Carroll County in 2017. He says former sheriff Steve Mullin went to the Hoosier Harvestore and got footage from the camera there of Allen’s Ford Focus at 1:17 p.m.

He says that on Oct. 13, 2022 Mullin called Allen in for an interview, he says Allen confirmed that we was wearing the same clothes Bridge Guy was wearing.

McLeland tells the jury that Allen said he saw three girls, but in the interview he changed the time he was there. He said Allen became angrier as the interview went on. He shows the jury photos of Allen’s Ford Focus in the garage during the search of Allen’s home.

He says they found the blue Carhartt jacket in Allen’s home. McLeland says “surprise surprise.”

McLeland says they found the Sig Sauer .40 caliber handgun and cartridges that were the same brand and caliber as the cartridge found at the crime scene. McLeland calls it a “Bridge Guy starter kit.”

He says they found a memories box and that box contained a .40 caliber cartridge. He says investigators found many electronic devices, but not the phone Allen used in 2017.

McLeland tells the jury that Allen searched “should I die now,” after looking at Delphi news in April 2022.

He tells the jury that Melissa Oberg found the cartridge at the scene cycled through Allen’s handgun and her work was verified. He says Allen confirmed in an Oct. 26, 2022 interview that he never load his gun or clothes out to anyone. He said Allen confirmed he did not loan anyone ammunition.

McLeland says “there is no explanation for how his bullet ended up there.” He says Allen’s wife Kathy was brought in for questioning and during the interview Allen manipulated her.

McLeland says Allen was arrested because he is Bridge Guy.

McLeland talks about calls Allen made in prison to his mother and wife. He describes a call Allen had with his mom where he says he has found faith. He plays a call with Allen’s wife where Allen says “I killed Abby and Libby,” his wife says “no you didn’t, dear, they are screwing with you there and I am trying to get to the bottom of it.”

He shows the confession letter Allen wrote to the warden. He shows the report from Dr. Wala on April 5, 2023 where Allen said his intentions were “sexual in nature.”

News 8’s Kyla Russell reports Allen is shaking his head during this.

McLeland tells the jury that Wala said that Allen’s behavior changed after his attorneys visited and that the shift in his behavior was intentional and that he was not psychotic.

McLeland reads multiple confessions made by Allen in prison, including one Allen made about using a box cutter to kill the girls.

McLeland says Allen told his mother in May of 2023 that “I wouldn’t sit here and tell you I did it, if I didn’t.”

He talks about another confession that Allen made in January 2024 after he had been moved out of the Westfield Correctional Unit.

McLeland describes Brian Harshman, the officer who read Wala’s reports and listened to Allen’s phone calls. He describes Harshman discovering the detail about the white van Allen said he saw while committing the crimes. He says Harshman verified the owner of that van in 2017.

He tells the jury that the owner of that van, Brad Weber did drive it that day. He points to Allen and says “something only the killer would know.” Allen raises his eyebrows.

McLeland says Harshman knew it was the same voice as Bridge Guy in all the calls he’s listened to from Allen.

McLeland shows the jury all the charges, which include charges for felony murder for killing Libby and Abby

He tells the jury, “now the pieces come together.”

McLeland says Bridge Guy “stole the youth and life” from Libby and Abby. he shows the Snapchat photo from Kelsi German’s car again. He says something in Libby caused her to begin recording on her phone. He tells the jury that there was a pause in the health data on Libby’s phone before Allen killed the girls.

He says “grabbing for her throat, struggling to stay alive, she begins to cry.”

He says Allen lived in the community for five years but didn’t know he left a cartridge at the scene.

McLeland reviews three points:

  1. Bridge Guy
  2. Bullet
  3. Confessions
“I believe the evidence is firmly convincing that Richard Allen is Bridge Guy and he killed Abby and Libby, McLeland told the jury.

After 58 minutes, McLeland is finished at 10:23 a.m.



10:34 A.M. COURT BEGINS, JUDGE GULL TALKS TO THE JURY.​

Before court begins, News 8’s Kyla Russell reports that defense attorney Andrew Baldwin writes “Rick” on a coffee cup and gives it to Allen. Normally Allen gets a coffee from the courthouse but today Baldwin has purchased one from a local shop.

At 8:47 a.m. Allen enters the room. Russell reports that he has a regular, large sized bible today and not the typical Gideon style bible he’s had in the past. He is heard saying he loves the coffee. He shows defense attorney Jennifer Auger a verse in his bible.

Prosecutor Stacey Diener is seen hugging the German and Williams family members. Abby’s mother is crying and being comforted by family.

At 9:04 a.m. Judge Gull enters the court room. The jury enters at 9:07. Court is in session.

Gull says the jury again had supervised contact with their electronic devices. She explains some of the case specific jury instructions:

  1. The jury must follow all law while deliberating.
  2. The jury must consider all facts.
Gull reads all the counts against Allen. He shakes his head as Gull reads charges that say he killed “AW,” and “LG.” She explains the concept of beyond reasonable doubt and the definition of murder.

Gull explains that if the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Allen killed the girls, they must find him guilty and vice versa.

Gull explains “intentionally” and what it means.



9 A.M. COURT IN SESSION FOR THURSDAY​

 
Last edited:
There is an addition to the narrative in the link I posted in post 9118 from day 17. So i will add it below.


POOL REPORTER’S TRANSCRIPTION OF A COURT EXHIBIT.​

The following is a direct transcription of an exhibit shown to the media today after court adjourned. It is a psych evaluation of Richard Allen prepared by Dr. John Martin on June 20, 2023.

“This morning the patient was interviewed in an interview cell. He had been wearing a uniform when he was taken to the cell but chose to take it off and was in a tee shirt and boxers. Several contusions on his face that had been self-induced are no longer as prominent. Eye contact was poor. he spoke very softly but also very briefly. He kept asking for Dr. Wala. He was coherent and spoke without loose associations or flight of ideas. He was oriented to person, place, time of day and situation. He has a constricted (ed. note, difficult to read this word.) affect. He said that he had suicidal ideations. He did not want to talk too much. What he did talk about was his concern for his wife. He said that he wanted to apologize to the families of his victims. He is eating his meals. He is keeping himself clean. A renew of the logs shows that he is getting an adequate amount of sleep and is eating most of his meals. He has been meeting with Dr. Wala for therapy sessions and is due to see her in a few minutes. He was not consistent in taking his oral medications and so it was discontinued. He will continue on Prozac. I am discontinuing the Haldol Decanoate today. In general he is much improved and does not appear to be psychotic at the present time. He claims to be suicidal. He is continued on suicide watch. He will be interviewed again in two weeks.” -End of transcription.

2:37 P.M. REMAINING REBUTTAL WITNESSES TESTIFY.​

At 1:16 p.m., Judge Gull returns to the court room. The jury enters shortly after.

Defense attorney Brad Rozzi begins cross-examination of Dr. John Martin, a license psychiatrist. Rozzi tells the jury that Dr. Martin does not have a traditional bachelor’s degree from and American university. Rozzi says Martin was terminated from a position in Florida. He says Martin was involved with lawsuits with a person that was in solitary confinement.

Prosecutor Stacey Diener calls for a sidebar and Judge Gull tells Rozzi to “move on.”

Martin tells the jury he went to Westville because there was a 200 to 250 case backlog. Rozzi describes SMI, or severe mental illness. Diener objects. Martin says solitary can cause or exaggerate mental illness.

Martin tells the jury that Allen could “possibly” move in and out of psychosis. He says that some of the meetings happened with Allen by speaking through his cell door. He says he did not watch camcorder or in-cell videos of Allen.

Martin said that on April 13, 2023, Allen was “very psychotic.” He said he agreed that Allen suffered from major depressive disorder and that him believing the was unfairly incarcerated could make the depression worse.

Martin tells the jury that he agrees that he reported being concerned when Allen met with his lawyers. He says Allen told Dr. Wala that he thought one of his lawyers was a good cop and the other was a bad cop.

Martin says he has treated a pre-trial detainee in prison that had no criminal history before. Rozzi shows Martin his previous deposition and Martin agrees that he earlier said he had not treated a pre-trial detainee in a prison before.

Martin agrees that Allen’s situation was unique to him.

He tells the jury about working on a computer off-site at times, Diener objects to this testimony.

Martin describes an occasion where he administered medication to an inmate from Michigan City in Westville.

He says he did not ask Allen if he had lawyers when he met with him in Nov. of 2022. Martin says that meeting was an interview and not a formal psychiatric visit. He says in a report from that same month that Allen had used alcohol socially.

Martin tells the jury that it would be more confusing for someone in solitary if they had not done something wrong.

Rozzi asks to play the video from June 20, 2023 in which Allen said he wanted to apologize to the families.

Diener asks to review. The video is played. The reporter in the court room cannot see the screen and reports that Kathy Allen looks away.

Gull calls for a sidebar in the middle of the video playing. Diener begins again.

Martin says his conversation with Allen on that day was an interview and that he was oriented. (Ed. note “in control of his faculties.”) He says Allen’s statement about apologizing to the families was spontaneous. Martin says he does not remember if the interaction was recorded.

Martin tells the jury that he does not know why Allen’s actions on June 20, 2023 seem different than what he had recorded but that he does not question his own records. He says he believes that Allen had returned to baseline by May 2, 2023.

He says he continued haldol after Allen was no longer in psychosis because he did not want it to ‘re-occur.’ he says he never again had to have an emergency meeting for Allen after the first meeting in April of 2023.

At 2:10 p.m. Rozzi begins again. Martin tells the jury there was not anything to communicate that Allen couldn’t have communicated spontaneously on June 6, 2023.

At 2:13 p.m. the jury asked questions:

  1. Did the oral haldol continue after June 20, 2023? Martin answers yes.
  2. What time did you meet with Allen on June 20, 2023? Martin says early in the morning.
  3. Based on the video, could this presentation be consistent with faking? Martin says no.
  4. Is it possible for Allen to slip in and out of psychosis in a 24-hour period? Martin says yes
At 2:15 p.m. the state says it has no other rebuttal witnesses. Gull tells the jury “you have now heard all arguments in this case.”

The jury exits the court room at 2:16 p.m. Defense attorney Andrew Baldwin revisits jury instructions wanting to add a statement of confessions. The state objects. The defense withdraws the request.

Baldwin again brings up an offer of proof involving a man named Elvis Fields, who is connected to the defense’s Odinism defense. The state says this does not matter because the defense has rested.

Baldwin says he wants Fields addressed because he did not respond to a subpoena. Judge Gull says she already ruled he would not testify.

Court is in recess at 2:27 p.m.

12:43 P.M.: RICHARD ALLEN’S PSYCHOSIS​

At 10:25 a.m., court went back into session and both sides approached the bench — the jury had not returned to the courtroom.

At 10:52 a.m., court went back into session and the prosecution said their witness was ready to testify.

The jury was seated at 11 a.m.

Diener called their witness, Breann Wilber to the stand.

Diener asked Wilber if she had a Snapchat photo of the Freedom Bridge taken on Feb. 13, 2017.

Wilber said she did. The photo was introduced as state’s exhibit #318.

Defense attorney Andrew Baldwin asked when Wilber gave Diener the bridge photo.

Wilber said she didn’t know exactly when she supplied the photo, but it was before her testimony earlier in the trial.

The photo, taken in a sequence with others, indicates Wilber arrived at the bridge at 12:25 p.m., according to News 8’s Kyla Russell.

Wilber said she walked from Freedom Bridge to the Monon High Bridge but did not see “Bridge Guy” or Abby and Libby on her walk.

Baldwin said Wilber had a good memory and asked her about remembering details of Feb. 13, 2017.

Diener interjected and said Wilber was interviewed shortly after the murders.

A short time later, Wilber was allowed to step down.

Next to testify is Brian Harshman, the Westville correctional officer who listened to Allen’s phone calls from jail.

He confirmed that Richard Allen has been in a one-man cell at Westville, Wabash, and Cass County.

Harshman said that Allen has a chair in his cell in Cass County and that the cell is bigger than the one at Westville was.

He told the court that there is less human interaction in Cass County than in Westville and that Allen has no “neighbors.”

Harshman also said that Richard Allen threatened the staff at Cass County.

Dr. John Martin, a licensed psychiatrist with 40+ years of experience in corrections, was next to testify.

Martin said he started working at Westville as third-party contractor in Feb. 2022 and began seeing Allen that November.

“He was stable. He had a history of depression but did not seem depressed,” Martin told the court.

Three weeks later, the doctor said, Allen seemed “fine” again. When they met on Nov. 24, 2023, sixteen days after their first session, Allen signed a consent form for Prozac.

He told the court he would prescribe Allen medication and knew Allen was on Prozac before arriving at Westville. He said he also had a record of when Allen took his medication because staff members would initial a certain log if he was successful.

Martin said he would type up notes on his computer after meeting with Allen and that the computer system was secure — no one else had access.

At this point, the state introduced two exhibits, including records of medications ordered for Richard Allen and medication logs signed by staff.

Martin said Allen was kept in “what could be referred to as solitary confinement; others say ‘one man cell.’”

He added that solitary confinement has a “punitive reason,” while a one-man cell does not.

“Mr. Allen had not done anything wrong, and yet he was being treated as though he had, or at least that’s what he could have felt,” Martin told the court.

He said that the prison had a responsibility to keep him safe and there were “many meetings” to ‘make life more comfortable” for Allen.

Martin said he knew Allen had suicide companions and had expressed suicidal interests. He also knew that Allen was sometimes moved to be seen by himself or Dr. Wala.

He testified that he saw Allen again in April 2023 after he got a “phone call that prompted him to visit Allen unplanned.”

Martin said he saw Allen lying naked on a cell mattress with feces smeared on his body.

He told prison staff he needed to see Allen and “they practically dragged him” to a shower cell and gave him a gown, Martin recalled.

Martin said it was at this point he decided Allen was “psychotic” and that in order to treat Allen’s psychosis, he had to put him on an antipsychotic medication.

Martin said he wanted to put Allen on Haldol (Haloperidol), an antipsychotic drug commonly used to treat schizophrenia, but Allen’s mental state was such that he could not consent to treatment.

In order to give him Haldol injections without consent, Martin called Dr. Hayes, a regional psychologist with his contractor, asked for an emergency meeting with 3 psychologists.

Martin said all three psychologists agreed Richard Allen was psychotic and he proceeded with the first treatment on April 14, 2023.

He testified that he gave Allen 5 milligrams of short-acting Haldol and that the maximum dose is 100 mg.

Martin said he administered such a small dose because he wanted to make sure Allen didn’t have a reaction.

After that, Allen was injected with a 15 mg dose of long-acting Haldol one every four weeks, with the first dose administered on April 18, 2023.

Martin said he saw Allen one week later and that Allen was “still psychotic” but there was “some improvement.”

He described the “improvement” as there being no evidence of smearing feces and that Allen would recognize him but he did not know the date.

Martin told the court that Allen knew he was in prison and asked for his wife and Taco Bell. There was also improvement in Allen’s coherence, eating and sleeping.

He said that he believed April 13 was the height of Allen’s psychosis.

Martin said he saw Allen several times in May, and each time, Allen was “coherent” and there was “no evidence” of psychosis By the end of the month, Allen was eating meals and had spoken to his wife.

On June 20, Allen had gone seven weeks without showing signs of psychosis and Martin decided to stop the Haldol injections.

Martin said Allen told him that day, “I would like to apologize to the families of my victims.”

He told the court Allen was “not psychotic” at the time of the statement.

The state finished its questions at 12:25 p.m. and the court adjourned for lunch until 1:15 p.m.
I actually saw it yesterday as the original link was updated. I will give them that for doing such that way. Keeps the first information and then adds the newer.
 
LOL RA didnt trust his lawyers.

From the above post.

"He says Allen told Dr. Wala that he thought one of his lawyers was a good cop and the other was a bad cop."

Also details regarding Haldol from Wiki.


Haloperidol, sold under the brand name Haldol among others, is a typical antipsychotic medication.[9] Haloperidol is used in the treatment of schizophrenia, tics in Tourette syndrome, mania in bipolar disorder, delirium, agitation, acute psychosis, and hallucinations from alcohol withdrawal.[9][10][11] It may be used by mouth or injection into a muscle or a vein.[9] Haloperidol typically works within 30 to 60 minutes.[9] A long-acting formulation may be used as an injection every four weeks for people with schizophrenia or related illnesses, who either forget or refuse to take the medication by mouth.[9]
Lol yeah with the good cop, bad cop thing. There's been a lot in the last few days of interest I wanted to remember to comment on and that was one of them. Just was working, and taking in each day's info and staying caught up was getting overwhelming. Since I try to watch the more detailed ones that run hours, like Tom, etc. makes it even harder.

Who do we think is bad cop and who is good cop. My guess is Rozzi is bad cop and Baldwin good cop but only because of the fake display of concern and affection put on by the latter... I'd say he's more bad cop for real though, as in doesn't play ethically imo... JMO of course...

And actually RA saying such does not show faith imo in either of them, it is like he thinks they are playing a routine game more know in relation to actual "cops"...

I'm glad you caught this and pointed it out because I was going to and forgot. You see, I am pretty caught up lol. For the moment anyhow.
 
You know late last night and then this morning, I thought I'm glad they've rested and am ready for this to end. What reporters both traditional and non have had to do to even try to cover this, us to even try to find out all we can about each day, and then of course that led to the families and how ready they are and the years they have been and lesser important, ALL OF US for answers and an end to it and justice...

I've said how in a weird way there will be a void when it does and they will have that too, a change in phase, and the satisfaction will hit (I am assuming he will be found guilty) and much needed justice but this has been a focus for far too many years also and the loss will hit again hard imo.

However, it is well past time it ends and I am glad they've rested and the finishing is coming and hopefully justice. I feel justice will be seen.

I never ever want to see another judge do this to the people that attend. The public out here is one thing, the people who bother to attend AND BEHAVE is another thing entirely. I'm sure the family knows as do we all there will be years upon years of appeals. Which SUCKS for them but it will at least be different and not quite the same as this entire process has been since the day of his arrest and the years of not knowing prior or having an arrest.

We will be hearing (well actually I guess we won't BE) the family's victim impact statements at some point and they will be wrenching and just bringing this back for a moment to the fact this is not about the girls where the entire thing as it always is has been about the defendant who becomes the "real" victim in almost every case... All about them.

I think the families will have a lot to say when they finally can but MAY be wrong. I have more I could say on that but for now will leave it, as to what they've put up with throughout this case on top of the coldest, cruelest horrendous deaths AND display of such by the D for one in the leak of two young loved ones. The handling of the case and more.

I lean very positive on juries and this one seems a good one so far as we can tell and I think all they need is here. As I've said throughout strip away the b.s. or the back and forths and come down to what you CAN look at that IS THERE and they will return the right verdicts on all counts imo.

If for some reason that I can't imagine they don't come back that way, this is going to be retried, COUNT ON IT. And the family will be going through this process again as will all. Unless a deal is struck and he doesn't deserve one imo but depending on outcome, such may happen I suppose.

Jmo and just thoughts of the families.

And get ready for lies in one side's closings imo. Closings are NOT fact any more than opening statements. And the D has a been inserting false facts and statements into their questions all along already.

I think the jury is smart enough though to have picked up on a lot of this and it can easily backfire on them.

With that, I am starting to sidetrack and so shall stop here.
 
Lol yeah with the good cop, bad cop thing. There's been a lot in the last few days of interest I wanted to remember to comment on and that was one of them. Just was working, and taking in each day's info and staying caught up was getting overwhelming. Since I try to watch the more detailed ones that run hours, like Tom, etc. makes it even harder.

Who do we think is bad cop and who is good cop. My guess is Rozzi is bad cop and Baldwin good cop but only because of the fake display of concern and affection put on by the latter... I'd say he's more bad cop for real though, as in doesn't play ethically imo... JMO of course...

And actually RA saying such does not show faith imo in either of them, it is like he thinks they are playing a routine game more know in relation to actual "cops"...

I'm glad you caught this and pointed it out because I was going to and forgot. You see, I am pretty caught up lol. For the moment anyhow.
I think Rozzi is bad cop because Baldwin was crying in court when they played the cell videos.

Just posted part of the D closing. They are only trying to frame Brad Weber FFS.

See my post 9143 above.

This is what Mcleland said and this will nail RA.

"McLeland describes Brian Harshman, the officer who read Wala’s reports and listened to Allen’s phone calls. He describes Harshman discovering the detail about the white van Allen said he saw while committing the crimes. He says Harshman verified the owner of that van in 2017.

He tells the jury that the owner of that van, Brad Weber did drive it that day. He points to Allen and says “something only the killer would know.” Allen raises his eyebrows. "

This is what will nail him. Can you imagine what Harshman must have thought when he heard that little nugget from RA himself?
 
Last edited:
I think Rozzi is bad cop because Baldwin was crying in court when they played the cell videos.O
I tend to agree for many reasons. RA at least would see B as good cop imo. The one willing to do whatever it takes and leak for him even to cover his confessions, but it isn't the way I look at it. I see B as bad, leave out the "cop" part... Not ethical, etc. But a perp wouldn't have that issue. I see them both as bad but if I am fair it is B who stinks in all of this... His office, his buddy, his sh*t unsecured and his stink.

And I tend to forget but isn't it true these two attys never worked together routinely but both were appointed...?

Since it's finally a day off, I SHOULD always get laundry in first as I hang dry a ton of it, but haven't, but I've listened to Tom's from last night, cleared my kitchen table which might not sound like much but is, of tons of lists and notes re my property and a few other things for some time now that piled up. Sorted other things important and kept them.

But anyhow Tom's chats are always worth listening to as he reminds of things as do the viewers... One was that the D never made a bone about where he was until he confessed, or filed anything. I am going to ask him at some point to do the timeline I always wish I could have to see when this came and that came because it all has been clear to me throughout but to recall it and ever get time is another story. He is a spreadsheet kind of person, I am not. He also is overwhelmed from the days of trial and talks of even putting things said in trial from his notes into a spreadsheet when this is done to compare, etc.

Anyhow, however, RA meant it, usually neither good cop NOR bad cop is a good thing to the individual it is being played to. I feel he, as I've said many times, was left to no counsel for months on end, and that he had no reason to trust either but that probably WIFE said to trust at some point...

I think they've all been played and the two D attorneys have tried to make up for their failures to save their own butts.

Again a timeline of throughout imo would show this but then the constant blizzards came...

I am making perfect sense to myself, not sure if I am to anyone else lol.
 
Haven't watched yet, waiting to get my buzzer system checked out, and more but Lauren often does a lunch live I've realized recently as I guess he has people who hold her place in line. How this sh*t works I don't know as far as getting back in.

Hearing the first few seconds and she is saying D did an excellent job could go either way, etc... Yet recently her opinion was he is guilty.

But keep in mind they do a lot of work but also get a LOT of money..

 
Okay while sharing, I still hearing. She says guilty but is thinking jury torn but she is trying to "analyze" and predict, some were inspired by Rozzi's speechb but then she has never been a fave and hyping kind of both sides sure gets more views, etc....

Both sides have done an excellent job, yada, yada, yada. And doesn't that keep all interested and happy....
 
And of course her and her husband can civilly disagree, and she doesn't think all jurors would agree with her thought of guilt right now. It's one thing that bothers me about the channel, seems to always kidn of be that way and it keeps all interested doesn't it OR watching to see what side wins out, etc....

SOrry sound kept playing as I was posting.
 
What a load of bull. He put the faeces on himself !!!!

"Rozzi shows the jury a photo a rack, a medieval torture device. He shows a photo of a thumbscrew. He says these tools are not far from what Allen experienced in solitary confinement.

Rozzi says these tools are still used, they’ve just evolved.

Rozzi shows four photos of Allen in prison. In the photos he is covered in feces and being dragged while wearing a spit hood.

News 8’s Kyla Russell says while the photos are shown, Allen looks away. His wife Kathy is crying.

Rozzi says “rendering a verdict of guilt could be endorsing this behavior.”

Rozzi asks the jury to set Allen free."

What a bunch of balderdash. Poor RA - he is the victim, not the girls. Makes me mad.

I hope McLeland makes sure he rebuts this trash.
 
Not one part of me would trust her read on a jury is another thing I'd add. I wouldn't trust anyone's read on a jury. I saw it once. Not in our murder but something more minor but a jury trial and I watched all, saw all jurors was in the courtroom and the guy that tI would have SWORN was going to vote guilty in watching him, eye contact, etc. went the totally opposite way. And was thinking no such thing. Just ONE example of many.

Anyhoiwi take Lauren, her tears and her read as you like.
 
It went to the jury at 1.40pm. They are appointing a foreman.

Mcleland rebuttal hasn't been posted yet - will post when it appears.

ETA Here it is. I posted it in the post with the link upthread too, but it is worth posting it again here.


Court is back in session at 1:07 p.m.

McLeland begins his rebuttal to the defense’s closing argument.

"He says it’s been a long 3 or 4 weeks, that now it is time to hand the case over to the jurors. He tells them “you’re in the driver’s seat.” “I’m not up here to tell you how to feel.”

McLeland says the defense did not back up their claims, that the prosecution has witnesses on the trail that day and that they simply reaffirm that Allen was there.

He tells the jury that witnesses after the murders on the high bridge do not matter.

McLeland points at Allen and says he used a gun to scare them. He says Libby had a “blood outline” of a tear on her face.

He tells the jury that Oberg’s testing was verified, that it links Allen to the crimes.

News 8’s Kyla Russell says Allen is extremely engaged and looking at Baldwin with disbelief.

McLeland says “words matter, why don’t Allen’s words matter?”

He says there are two victims in the case, Abby and Libby. He says “they are Allen’s victims. But they aren’t just victims, they are heroes.”

McLeland says “Libby said someday she is going to help police solve crimes, that’s exactly what she did.”

McLeland ends his rebuttal."

Oh my. I think we will have a verdict before the weekend.
 
Last edited:
What a load of bull. He put the faeces on himself !!!!

"Rozzi shows the jury a photo a rack, a medieval torture device. He shows a photo of a thumbscrew. He says these tools are not far from what Allen experienced in solitary confinement.

Rozzi says these tools are still used, they’ve just evolved.

Rozzi shows four photos of Allen in prison. In the photos he is covered in feces and being dragged while wearing a spit hood.

News 8’s Kyla Russell says while the photos are shown, Allen looks away. His wife Kathy is crying.

Rozzi says “rendering a verdict of guilt could be endorsing this behavior.”

Rozzi asks the jury to set Allen free."

What a bunch of balderdash. Poor RA - he is the victim, not the girls. Makes me mad.

I hope McLeland makes sure he rebuts this trash.
Well despite it all, Lauren still says Guitly but says his closing was getting to some jurors. Whatever. I'm sorry but it seems to always be played both ways with them.

Nothing erases the facts.

Keep in mind this is their fame, tte D, it is their big moment and yet no one or not enough cover their absolute failures.

Keep in mind ALSO the media ND leaks and most are giving a slant ONE WAY after shutting up forever...
 
It went to the jury at 1.40pm. They are appointing a foreman.

Mcleland rebuttal hasn't been posted yet - will post when it appears.

ETA Here it is. I posted it in the post with the link upthread too, but it is worth posting it again here.


Court is back in session at 1:07 p.m.

McLeland begins his rebuttal to the defense’s closing argument.

"He says it’s been a long 3 or 4 weeks, that now it is time to hand the case over to the jurors. He tells them “you’re in the driver’s seat.” “I’m not up here to tell you how to feel.”

McLeland says the defense did not back up their claims, that the prosecution has witnesses on the trail that day and that they simply reaffirm that Allen was there.

He tells the jury that witnesses after the murders on the high bridge do not matter.

McLeland points at Allen and says he used a gun to scare them. He says Libby had a “blood outline” of a tear on her face.

He tells the jury that Oberg’s testing was verified, that it links Allen to the crimes.

News 8’s Kyla Russell says Allen is extremely engaged and looking at Baldwin with disbelief.

McLeland says “words matter, why don’t Allen’s words matter?”

He says there are two victims in the case, Abby and Libby. He says “they are Allen’s victims. But they aren’t just victims, they are heroes.”

McLeland says “Libby said someday she is going to help police solve crimes, that’s exactly what she did.”


McLeland ends his rebuttal."

Oh my. I think we will have a verdict before the weekend.
Hmm. Biggest stand out to me is why is RA looking at Baldwin in disbelief? I have to really remind myself hti is news coverage.

The other thing I have to say is this case is backwards and normally when a case is over we kind of fai to follow it as here come another BUT I am waiting for testimony and records to be released and we SHOULD go back over this one no matter this it turns out as we have not been able to hear or follow a thing word for word. Event hen it won't be "recorded" as Libby did, he had a great point there. Among others. I think the first rush to get this stuff out as people are waiting is not going to be as good as later coverage.

It was like Lauren at the break/lunch time, had to rush to be one with it out while hoping ot have her seat secured in the courtroom.

Gull'\s rules on this sh*t have been the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen but then there is Bob Mottta with a reserved seat by the defense.

RA is really just their, I am drawing a blank for the word for it? Not lackey... Someone used to do their agenda... Puppet. That's not quite right either BUt someone will get it, there is a word...
Anyhow, jmo.

It's all there. And there is so much that could have been shared and said through these weeks of more thourough coverage if anyone had the time to do so. Sooo many things I wanted to share but not how life goes and it was made that way for reporters too, NOT that they'd have EVER more fully covered even if they had such.

Here's where I come down though. The jury has heard all and seen all and been there. Now there IS a lot of reading between the lines to be done but even without that, it will dial down to what it should by a responsible jury. Clear away the blizards and debris...

It WAS an out there helluva try and not a perfect investigation but it is THERE.

And as I have said ad nauseum for far longer than before trial, that voice is going to be a major thing if they have the right to listen and compare and like some other things, I dont' get why that was not put up by the P in like a side by side voice comparison... That ALONE is a clinch. Then there eis all the other.
 
It went to the jury at 1.40pm. They are appointing a foreman.

Mcleland rebuttal hasn't been posted yet - will post when it appears.

ETA Here it is. I posted it in the post with the link upthread too, but it is worth posting it again here.


Court is back in session at 1:07 p.m.

McLeland begins his rebuttal to the defense’s closing argument.

"He says it’s been a long 3 or 4 weeks, that now it is time to hand the case over to the jurors. He tells them “you’re in the driver’s seat.” “I’m not up here to tell you how to feel.”

McLeland says the defense did not back up their claims, that the prosecution has witnesses on the trail that day and that they simply reaffirm that Allen was there.

He tells the jury that witnesses after the murders on the high bridge do not matter.

McLeland points at Allen and says he used a gun to scare them. He says Libby had a “blood outline” of a tear on her face.

He tells the jury that Oberg’s testing was verified, that it links Allen to the crimes.

News 8’s Kyla Russell says Allen is extremely engaged and looking at Baldwin with disbelief.

McLeland says “words matter, why don’t Allen’s words matter?”

He says there are two victims in the case, Abby and Libby. He says “they are Allen’s victims. But they aren’t just victims, they are heroes.”

McLeland says “Libby said someday she is going to help police solve crimes, that’s exactly what she did.”


McLeland ends his rebuttal."

Oh my. I think we will have a verdict before the weekend.
It's possible. They have been handed it early on Thursday. That was one of my things, was as far as when the jury would get it... They have a good amount of time today and all day tomorrow and have been able to discuss and be through a lot of it day by day if they chose to with all 15 present...
 
Hmm. Biggest stand out to me is why is RA looking at Baldwin in disbelief? I have to really remind myself hti is news coverage.

The other thing I have to say is this case is backwards and normally when a case is over we kind of fai to follow it as here come another BUT I am waiting for testimony and records to be released and we SHOULD go back over this one no matter this it turns out as we have not been able to hear or follow a thing word for word. Event hen it won't be "recorded" as Libby did, he had a great point there. Among others. I think the first rush to get this stuff out as people are waiting is not going to be as good as later coverage.

It was like Lauren at the break/lunch time, had to rush to be one with it out while hoping ot have her seat secured in the courtroom.

Gull'\s rules on this sh*t have been the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen but then there is Bob Mottta with a reserved seat by the defense.

RA is really just their, I am drawing a blank for the word for it? Not lackey... Someone used to do their agenda... Puppet. That's not quite right either BUt someone will get it, there is a word...
Anyhow, jmo.

It's all there. And there is so much that could have been shared and said through these weeks of more thourough coverage if anyone had the time to do so. Sooo many things I wanted to share but not how life goes and it was made that way for reporters too, NOT that they'd have EVER more fully covered even if they had such.

Here's where I come down though. The jury has heard all and seen all and been there. Now there IS a lot of reading between the lines to be done but even without that, it will dial down to what it should by a responsible jury. Clear away the blizards and debris...

It WAS an out there helluva try and not a perfect investigation but it is THERE.

And as I have said ad nauseum for far longer than before trial, that voice is going to be a major thing if they have the right to listen and compare and like some other things, I dont' get why that was not put up by the P in like a side by side voice comparison... That ALONE is a clinch. Then there eis all the other.
Their patsy ?

I am disgusted with how they have insinuated mistreatment at the correctional centre. There is just no evidence of that and he was there for his own protection. As we stated the other day, LISK is in solitary too - it is normal that they have to protect these accused murderers. If they were not protected, they would be dead and could not then have a fair trial.

They had no defence, no alibi, he lied about the time he was there, he knew about the white van, Libby recorded him, his bullet was there. There is no defence for those facts.
 
I think Rozzi is bad cop because Baldwin was crying in court when they played the cell videos.

Just posted part of the D closing. They are only trying to frame Brad Weber FFS.

See my post 9143 above.

This is what Mcleland said and this will nail RA.

"McLeland describes Brian Harshman, the officer who read Wala’s reports and listened to Allen’s phone calls. He describes Harshman discovering the detail about the white van Allen said he saw while committing the crimes. He says Harshman verified the owner of that van in 2017.

He tells the jury that the owner of that van, Brad Weber did drive it that day. He points to Allen and says “something only the killer would know.” Allen raises his eyebrows. "

This is what will nail him. Can you imagine what Harshman must have thought when he heard that little nugget from RA himself?
Oh he is nailed if the jury is intelligent. No doubt.

Harshman also says that IS the voice of RA and I've known that for a LONG TIME. Long damedn time. Been saying for forever in here, a year, two? I hard ONE dead on comparison, I was not Harshman listening to hundreds upon hundreds of phone calls as he did and he KNOWS it TOO.

Imo, RA knows it, KA knows it, daughter knows it and mother knows it... It is stinking DEAD ON exact.

And then there is ALL the other. Including the van and so much more.

B & R were about going DOWN for lousy attys and had to turn it around. I sure know the type.

I am waiting for years from now when RA and/or his family turn on them as failing him...

I'm talking a few different things than you are but really, it's just the upset over the final sh*t and the bullsh*t.

There is sooo much and so much SN*WING but he is BG. They are ONE AND THE SAME.
 
Their patsy ?

I am disgusted with how they have insinuated mistreatment at the correctional centre. There is just no evidence of that and he was there for his own protection. As we stated the other day, LISK is in solitary too - it is normal that they have to protect these accused murderers. If they were not protected, they would be dead and could not then have a fair trial.

They had no defence, no alibi, he lied about the time he was there, he knew about the white van, Libby recorded him, his bullet was there. There is no defence for those facts.
NO, but get that term. That is more someone that tries to blame someone else. The D is using him to help their carerrs and cover their mistake or maintain after filing to be decent counsel, but also trying to launch from him and be known, famous, etc.

I wouldn't buyh a singlle tear of B\s like i'd but the tears on Libby. Disgusts me even hearing such as if it is even the same. They don't care about this man or his faimly, bull effeing sh*t.

It's been a ride but I have real faith in the jury. Almost anyone attending and reporting real has decided hei is guilty after hearing things WE HAVE NOT HEARD. I can reocgnize a too late blizzxard and suspect he jury can too...

THERE are SOOO many things there's been no time to share....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,423
Members
964
Latest member
ztw1990
Back
Top Bottom