I was replying to Tresir, the name should be evidence of that, surely?
As far as your implication, GrandmaBear, that RA changed his story...
where is the audio copy of his first interview with DNR Dulin? It doesn't
exist so far, because Dulin belongs to the 'dog ate my evidence' school
of Indiana policing, as Dulin asserts he can't find the audio recording,
although, hey, it's OK, cause Dulin asserts he records all his other
interviews, so let's just be nodding donkeys and accept every thing LE
says in this... Indiana is surely a magical place, where they should just
abolish the courts, because surely no bloody LE would ever be untruthful!
EDIT: P.S. non-fired bullet scratches = nonsense science, as to the
audio comparisons, well, all that can be said (+ with the recording static)
is that that's in the ear of the beholder... sounds to me like that's a younger
man than RA's age. (Also, phone video isn't visually a clear resolution, e.g.
the hair can't be made out).
Of course it is clear who you are replying to but no one here can reference to which post you are responding to of hers or anyone's, it helps to be able to reference both in the same post and I'm not the first person that has said it. It works at least you re tagging the person now but the reply option is better. Just trying to help.
I am no fan of Dulin and if there is ONE thing in this case that is NOT helpful it is this loss of a recording and letting a rent a cop do this work apparently without any training on how to even fill out data fields on forms. You are not going to get an argument on me about Dulin at all so there is some agreement there. We didn't even know his name here until not all that long ago, I heard it in a Webster video and then we knew. I don't know if I believe Dulin even bothered to record him so again no argument there. I DO WONDER though how RA approached LE, it was on the tip line wasn't it? And what did he say that when vetting tips Dulin got sent instead of some real officer/detective... I also wonder if Dulin and RA knew each other and so forth. So while I agree on him, we don't know it all.
You didn't respond to providing the transcript of RA's interview? Since they are talking of it on Reddit with knowledge, then it must be leaked or someone has it no? Pretty sure I've never seen it NOR his confessions for that matter. Ya see he confessed too ya know. And that's what I mean, I am sure you can come up with an excuse or reason for that too but it has to be done for way too many things...
I disagree entirely on the bullet evidence and it also wraps in with the girls mentioning a gun and Allen placing himself there and then his bullet fits/matches. Something else you have to find answers for, too many things If he is being framed, that's a joke because that bullet was found years ago and no access to Allen's gun or knowledge of it was had until recent times.
And again Allen confessed. Something like five times.
No offfense at alll but your remarks about the video and voice I don't even think worth responding to as I think your take on it definitely is in the eye of the beholder. That sounds nothing like some young man and it looks nothing like a young man either. It looks exactly the age range he is and the voice is out of all I have heard over all of these years the first time I have ever felt an almost dead on match.
When the new sketch came out almost NO ONE could make BG that young sketch and all were like WTH???
We don't have to agree and I don't. The case is not perfect but it is there. Dulin is unfortunate to say the least and I don't like either that the tip itself was missing for years. Yeah I don't disagree on that stuff but what it leads me to is WHY would Dulin do all of that, cause all of that. Am I truly to believe he was that much of a Dufus Dulin or he knew Allen or something or was simply drunk on the job? Last name field you put in street name... OR did Allen provide mixed details like that? I am Ricky Whitehurst (or whatever street name was) and I live on Allen Street...Or Dulin couldn't read or his own notes or put down enough detail but did he not have his recording then for reference...? So YES, I can agree on Dulin. In some fairness though this is a small department, and a very small for staffed jail, etc. And they had never seen a crime of this nature and magnitude before. I can think of one in my area that made NATIONAL news and TV shows and when it all happened yes, there was a DNR guy who scrambled to help as ALL did to the are that could from small counties and also a wooded MORE so rural area than this one. It isn't unusual but the part about his being sent to vet and handle tips afterwards I wonder more about. BUT they get a lot of crazy tips too so maybe he was to just vet and then call attention to detectives of ones that should get more attention. Who nows. I am sure it was a total scramble in the early days to find a system especially with other agencies assisting.
Here's the thing though, first I think we can be pretty certain RA never denied on his second interview to coming forward back when. And that he was there. So that's fact. Didn't deny talking to Dulin, etc. You nor anyone can take him AWAY that day or parking where he did. That's FACT, corroborated by he himself Then wowza he also magically owns a Sig. I will tell you I live in the midwest where all nearly all own guns and I've seen it my entire life all decades since a child til now and I have never known a soul that owned a Sig. And then wozza the bullet matches and CANNOT be excluded but can be included with high probabilty. I could go on.
Here is the other thing, the probable cause would be enough in my opinion with JUST all of that. Also, take heart, Old D, new D or future D or whoever the heck ends up representing Allen at trial can subpoena Dulin and go at all these things. But so can prosecution go at his lie if he did change his time frame in second interview with things to show it s false too, etc., etc.
I'm not surprised you went to Dulin, I thought of him when I wrote my last post to you and figured you would. Kind of expected it lol.
You centered on that and time statement. The time statement in the second interview was provided by the alleged PERP and the guy who was THERE. That automatically in any case makes me not trust it. Did he provide a work record, bring in the boss or anything? Bank record showing him (not wife) or use of HIS credit card grabbing a case of beer at such a time? I'm sure not. And let me tell you you darned well can access those thins in such a time frame as this case yet. In the last couple of years I had to get YEARS of bank records and credit card statements. And was able to.
Oh but let me guess, he left his car parked there and had someone pick him up and went to their house and took a nap so NOPE no evidecne BUT I am going to bet prosecution looked at all they could find from that day.
And of course defense isn't going to mention one thing that is negative towards client and prosecution does not LEAK.
Anyhow you went straight to what did not surprise me but never responded to other parts. Transcript or recording of Allen? Who "leaked" this on Reddit?
And more.
And if you see the way the rest of us reply like in this one and all, anyone reading can see the full post of yours above and then my reply to it here to see what you responded to, etc. And what was being talked of. Makes it easier is all. Just trying to help.
And to each their own. I think it makes for a lively and interesting discussion so none of this is with any animosity at all. My opinion can be changed if something ever gives me reason but not a thing out there so far has done so and in fact the desperate actions of the defense and some other things just cement my opinion more. At this point anyhow.
en.wikipedia.org
www.crimewatchers.net
