Pics of RA's car at approx 1.43.00 onwards. You can see why it was seen as purple by one witness. Very interesting too the bit about RA confession on April 3rd beginning at 1.47.00.
So he met with his legal team and they gave him his paperwork which he took back to his cell and read and he then called his wife and mother confessing to them and then broke his iPad and ate the paperwork. This all being on camera.
Yeah, I love watching Tom where none of the sensational at all goes on. He is so totally boned up on knowledge of the case, so organized I wish he could help me in life lol, and sees without blinders.
I didn't get to watch much of it and hope to. I happened onto it as it was nearing the end and linked it here for others.
His shows tend to be long which makes it hard to always watch them for me, but I try to never miss one and go back and do so. I feel the need to find some sane in this case or be around some at times lol than all the other that goes on and the many that go for it and add to it.
Yes he'ss talked of the timing of the confessions before and like I keep saying, the TIMING of everything that has went on in this case and that defense has done tells a story imo and yes, RA's timing too as to what spurred confessions. I think way back upwards in the thread I mentioned this and that what he read showed them they had something he had not known of imo and he felt LE had him/has him dead to rights. I actually had forgotten about this for a bit with all the other that's went on but yes, that's been shared before I think and Tom has certainly said it before.
I think it's a bit laughable that defense and their followers and I believe the FM infer guards forced him to call and confess when in actuality, RA's own attorneys gave him paperwork to read and THAT is when he CONFESSED.
Now that you mention it and it is fresh to again, I am also pretty sure I said as I do for other reasons as well, that there's more evidence than we know, just as I've said when everyone assumes all defense filings contain it all and don't omit anything that would not favor their client. I've also said there is something that worries them and plays into wanting that warrant dismissed and needing the huge distraction of the FM and then the leak and even perhaps getting Gull off the case. I think the case is likelly unwinnable for Allen with the evidence so then the only way to win is to explode the case for good or at least buy a ton of time causing a ton of issues. Lots to think on with that and the timing of ALL and each thing defense has done. I don't come in much but I will keep saying TIMING ad nauseum.
I'd love to get Tom to do a timeline for what I see, he is sooooo organized and thorough. Lol.
So they continue to make little sense on another note. They are back on their boomerang. Whining about speedy trial never even filed for in ISC filings, then showing nothing after but needs for delays and no speedy trial filing which was no surprise imo. Just a week or so ago they delayed again claiming a lot of new evidence and discovery and needed time no way could they get through in time but now they have (or have they?) and are ready or can be for a speedy trial? Good Lord
So did RA insist on this? Or more likely is this defense attys themselves again and if so, have they explained to RA that his own attys who he saw say they can't be prepared enough for a deadline that wasn't even trial and go through all evidence just provided but they can be for speedy trial and he should feel assured of that? I certainly wouldn't be feeling assured of anything when saying one week they can't be prepared for a more minor thing but now can be for full on trial. I'd be really worried if in his shoes.
Of course it could simply be they had to or lose the chance to play this card, no idea, I will have to go watch the takes on it. By some channel not on the crazy train. Some good ones have even boarded it although a couple have come more down to earth lately so hopefully I can find one. Maybe Tom went into that? He isn't an attorney but he sure sees a lot pretty clearly.. I figure since it was just filed though he may not have. Actually amazingly most channels and news that have been out there have went pretty silent on this case in the last month or so. Interesting.
It's funny but even though somewhere I still have outrage and disgust at the behavior here and I feel lack of ethics and serious lack of intelligence and professionalism (sorry to any who disagree but it is what I feel I've seen displayed), I realized last night and this morning, now I am beginning to just find these attorneys tiresome, I am actually a bit bored by it all, and I find that interesting and didn't expect it. I'lll probably watch Tom if I get time or play it while I take care of other things, I ALWAYS find his shows worthwhile but this news doesn't even strike me. It's like ho hum, big deal.
That in turn as I realize it just now makes me wonder can they do this to the public too or could they to a jury if they go on long enough with various things at trial, or stunts and so on? To where a jury just gets to where they quit listening to them....? Because that's kind of how I'm feeling. I'm not even curious about finding out more if there is more and just kind of "so what" about it.
I will say though and I'd never assume this in any case and can't be sure in this one that I'd hedge a bet in THIS one that the prosecution is prepared if speedy trial comes about. I think they've methodically been doing their job all along while having to deal with the intentional defense distractions and leaks and problems. If this does result in a speedy trial, I'd put my odds on who handles it better being the P.
However, I also think D may have a few more on board than they let on. I mean all one has to do is look at the assistance that came with the ISC and from the PD coalition and more... Nothing would surprise me. And a "surprise" would probably bore me and seem pretty expected by this point anyhow, and sorry to say, predictable when it comes to them as to if there will be one and what it might be... I'd say lol, but don't even have that much interest. Just kind of blase about it all right now.
I will watch Tom regardless as it is always worth it and I want to see the things that refresh some of what I had forgotten about with all the other off track kind of stuff lately largely having nothing to do with the case and the facts.
Just kind of a first morning off catch up and thoughts. I actually got 8 hours of sort of sleep, not all uninterrupted but that's rare. I always want such on a day off and need it but it never happens. Last couple were kind of half awake but made myself stay in bed and kind of half asleep drifting on and off. Soto kept playing in my mind. That case from the start almost really gets to me/ Audrii's just as bad or worse (there is no worse in cases but...), however hers has quieted for the moment so it is thankfully where a person can try to put aside/compartmentalize those details and not think about them until one has to again and have BOTH doing that which was the case for a bit. There is an arrest, she was recovered dead, nothing is going to change that. Soto, there is an arrest and charges BUT not for her murder yet and mom Is questionable so it is with questions yet and very awful. I also watched an interview of the parents of the 15 year old missing autistic boy the other night and want to share on that but I often end up not able to hit all threads so maybe I'll just give my recap and no detail on all in the current crimes thread. Bigsby is in trial and more. Some cases no one discusses anyhow sadly.
So that's it for here. I don't worry about reading all or following it but do drop in on occasion and read the ones I land on. And will always try to drop what I feel likely a good show or new info on a case and Tom is always worth it imo. He is not a "crime" podcaster as with some who try too hard to cover ever single case, that's what Grizzly is doing. Tom is mostly just Delph and totally Delphi knowledgeable. He pretty much does ONE case. I've seen him have another show or two on rare occasion but it isn't his life, he isn't in it for $$ ot to become the biggest crime channel and is just the best imo with this case. Fact and document oriented and gets the docs and facts and organizes them and knows th em.
Enough by me anyhow. Good morning and see yas.
en.wikipedia.org
www.crimewatchers.net
