Was your bullet/casing there? You go to Wegman's with a gun and eject a round after probably threatening?
Where else were you that day? Do we know anything more about his day and other's accounts/
NOTHING that has been done even by the defense removes RA. I am not opposed to there MAY have been another involved but I do not lean towards it.
Also does Wegman's or your city have cameras? Like Libby did?
Like I said NONE of us know all, INCLUDING me but to fall for defense selective b.s. in every case where they play it to the public and the blizzards, without ever hearing what prosecution has is really assuming.
Nothing has taken away the basic facts here, not a thing the defense has done but has some so off seeing it, it is something else. He placed himself there. NOTHING has removed him even if Os joined him. Which they did not. There is sooooo MUCH we don't know. But even with what we do, they have not accomplished that with all their efforts. He CONFESSED. REPEATEDLY. Hey I'm all for releasing some of this stuff to stop the ridiculous b.s. Not at the risk of the case against the killer of these TWO YOUNG GIRLS though.
I took think our system needs to change. Defense should NOT be ABLE to circumvent a gag order and intentionally do PR and b.s. blitz in the guise of just filing or being clueless and messing up and so on.
It needs to be tried, no doubt. And I hope it is when scheduled. WAtch and see though. My guess at this point is that that won't happen.
Of COURSE with crowd funding, they don't have much excuse any longer although next it will be their expert's schedule or some other bogus claim. I HOPE it goes off when scheduled to end this all. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but I think the prosecution is ready.
I'll also be fair and say I am not 100 percent tickled with either side. More LE failures on the one side than prosecution but I think all know my opinion of the defense.
And I will reiterate there is something RA was really scared of and they are too or more than one thing.
Again, could be wrong.
I CANNOT imagine the heartache and b.s. this creates for either girls' family right now and for some time now.
I don't even wait for the BIG bullet or thing that I think may be there, I want to hear his wife on the stand just for starters.... He won't get up. I'll bet on that right now.
Anyhow....
I could say a hundred other things in different directions as we all could.
But as far as your Wegman's thing, maybe you did do it... And because of reasons other than they simply found a dead body next to your car.
Make up your mind. WAs RA part of it and another was there or not? Or it was someone else all together and he is innocent? You've backed off the RL thing have you let that go? No offense but you don't have one thing you settle on other than when stuck on RL and I am still open to a few things but not all over the spectrum. RA was there. RA did this or was part of this.
When did he recant by the way? WHEN did RA recant his confessions?
I must have missed that.
If you want to see this information for yourself, look it up. I've posted a lot of stuff that later I'm asked for proof. I'm tired of going back to find stuff. I'm assuming a lot of it is in CourtTV videos nobodies bothered to watch. I watched the Nancy Grace video and she wasn't even aware that RLs alibi had been proven to be a lie. Her video was meant to show that RA did it.
Explain the phone hits of RLs phone around where the bodies were found at 10pm the night before. If you want to say they didn't have the technology to accurately prove he was near the bodies, prove it. We'll have to wait til the trial to find out for sure, because none of us can prove anything about that ourselves.
I'm not closed minded. I've said before he may have been involved, but he obviously wasn't the only one.
After listening to his temporary lawyer assert so confidently that he truly believes he wasn't capable of doing this it means a lot. It came across to me that he was telling the truth. It causes me to think he may not have been involved at all. He's not his lawyer, he's not compelled to assert innocence no matter what.
Once again,
SOMEONE please tell me who's fingerprints and DNA are at the scene? If you can't, tell me why doesn't it matter to the case.
Also, I can't supply a link because I read, and mostly post things, but I recall that the bullet didn't have fingerprints on it. If there were, they weren't RAs. RAs fingerprints and DNA are nowhere to be found on the crime scene.
The bullet being ejected from his gun isn't as damning as a fired bullet by any stretch of the imagination. It's the same gun that the local PD carry. The defense will put on their own witness.
The prosecution checked with a professor who is an expert on religions like Odinism. The prosecution didn't tell the defense. The defense found out and asked the prosecution for his name. The prosecution "Lost" or "Forgot" his name. The defense found out who it was and interviewed him. He told the defense the exact opposite of what the prosecution claimed he said and why they didn't follow up. That guy is now going to be a defense witness. The prosecution has not denied the defenses claims on that, to my knowledge.
Three different kinds of cars were identified as being there. None were a Ford Focus, or black. He admitted he was there and where he parked. Why would he do that if he killed these kids. Yes, the girls saw him and he admits it. It seems to me that a murderer would deny it was him they saw. The fact that he backed in means little to me. I back into my space a lot. It doesn't matter though. NYS requires plates on the front and back.
Just because he was the only guy there wearing those clothes, doesn't mean that it was him as bridge guy. I read a lot of comments under some of the videos about this case where some locals believe he didn't do it either. (I was surprised at how many believe this.) A couple have said that you probably couldn't find a house without those exact type of clothes in Delphi.
If someone has half a brain and was going to kill someone, they wouldn't walk out in the open. Instead, I believe, they would stay in the shadows. So not seeing anybody else there doesn't mean anything.
A few people who knew RL called the cops and said that it had to be him when the news about where they were found was announced. Two people, very close, to RL identified him as bridge guy. In an interview, RL was asked to repeat "Down the hill." When he did he raised his pitch on the word "hill". Why? That's not how it was said. The video has been posted here.
The judge is obviously trying to sabotage the defenses case. If convicted RA will probably get a retrial and if found not guilty they won't look for the real killers.
It certainly appears that the mystery DNA and fingerprints aren't being investigated by the local police.
This case has stunk from the beginning and it just gets worse all the time. Did he do it alone? I'm
POSITIVE he didn't. Was he involved? I need to know more. Finding the owner of the DNA and fingerprints at the scene will tell us a lot more.
As I've said I want
THE GUY(s) responsible for this convicted. Not someone based on circumstantial evidence when there's DNA and fingerprints at the scene.
In the video I posted by the FBI agent six months before RA was arrested, he says nobody wet was seen leaving the area after the murders were supposed to have taken place. I believe his point was that RL could simply have walked up the hill to his house. That also call into question the existence of Muddy/Bloody guy.
Also, one of the branches placed on one of the bodies had been freshly cut. I have no idea how thick the branch was, but if it required a saw (which it sounds like it did.) Explain how that was cut at the scene. Did RA have a saw with him?
I find it distressing that so many people are willing to convict him without solid evidence. The gun evidence isn't solid. The bullet wasn't found by the time the crime scene had been cleared. Then two days later they re-secured the crime scene and miraculously found the bullet. (That information is in one of the videos posted here.) I don't know the timing of that. If the crime scene was re-secured after the seizure of RAs gun, that would be
REALLY hinky to me.
This is why I doubt he was involved or at the very least acted alone.
He has no past behavior typical of killers. AFAIK, he never killed animals as a kid or had other psychopathic traits. Oh, and there is no proof that the cat hair found matches the cat hair found at the scene. All we know is they collected cat hair because cat hair was found at the scene.
In every other case I've followed the prosecution is forthcoming with information because they have to share all of it with the defense anyway. LISK told us that his wife's DNA and his DNA was found on the bodies. They told us how they tracked him down using cell phone data.
We knew about the coverup in the Ahmaud Arbery case prior to trial. We knew about the video (That had been released by a lawyer's suggestion.) That ended up convicting them.
We knew a lot about Mark Redwine long before his arrest.
We knew a lot about Harmony Montegomery's dad long before the trial.
We know a lot about people who haven't been tried yet, or charges dropped because of evidentiary problems.
We know very little about this case. My belief is that there isn't a lot to report.
en.wikipedia.org
www.crimewatchers.net
