Well, I know that's what he said- that he asked her how long he'd been gone and that she said 25 minutes but what did she say about when she woke up? I remember her telling detectives about the phone call but I don't remember precisely her version of the dialogue.
Bear in mind, too, that the father was convinced that he'd seen an illicit photo on Jennifer's phone and when the detective (essentially) told him that was impossible he said well, he must have "envisioned" it. My point is that we're relying on their memory of the conversation and so we can't take either to the bank, we can only go with what makes sense. (And since my way is the ony way that makes sense, I think we should just go with that, lol!)
I know about the photo remark yes.
I watched something hours ago and it was the entire part where people get where she said what Stephan did was not evil. She did say that more or less. There are just too many things with her for me. Too many things like here (not you) that have to be explained. I had seen the interview already but maybe I never finished it because I do have some opened ones iet I saw most of but never finished out. I actually had put on a new one, hours ago when I couldn't sleep, from The Behavior Panel who I know you don't watch, but if I recall you will watch Dr. G. They were using clips from her harder interview with LE where she is sitting on the couch. I have seen that but maybe I did not finish the last bit, if not, it is still open for me to do so. I have a bit with one more of more minor interviews with The Docket still open too. Of friends, etc.
Anyhow, my point is, how much has to be explained away with her right now and to date? I mean you keep giving reasons for this or that on many things. Numbers of them.
This part of this couch interview and more of it around that time in it is pretty damning. She also talks as if she knew something, had to have a rule which she eventually broke about them not ever having sleepover and when pressed on that, or why you even would need one, should not even be a question, imo she fails there big time. I think shek knew something had happened at some point and she let it go, absorbed it, whatever... There's too much with her, I'm sorry.
As far as Stephan's dad, yeah, it's what he says but she also has done this kind of thing with LE more than once. Gives a time. On seeing her get dressed and many things. And far later has to explain and even admit she lied or never knew on a multitude of things is the problem.
I don't know re the murder but I tell you nothing would surprise me at this point, but I am convinced she knew re the SA and she calls that not evil basically, I was actually going to put what I watched earlier on and give a time stamp. He is only evil if he killed her. THe SA I guess does not matter... Is how she comes across. Totally.
And so it is not just about Stephan's dad or what the fact is there because she kept doing this kind of thing.
And when that detective boxed her in as to why she needed a rule (she later broke) she pretty much shows the truth imo. Something had happened imo and she knew of it. It is jmo and I know you are not going to agree.
I have seen so many parents charged on less than this. Less than sending their kid to bed with an adult male. And more.
I have lost almost all sympathy for her. And watching the Behavior Panel too, whether one likes them or not, pointed out a few things that are obvious as well. Everything is about how it affects her. Everything. None of it is about her daughter or what she went through or suffered, and even when alive, about Jenn's sleep, about everything. THey talked lack of empathy and more and how people like that relate to what is best for them, etc.
It was interesting but even if not into that, the parts of that interview....
These detectives are doing an outstanding job and they have all this. I am reaching a point where she disgusts me.
No matter what the deal was when he took her car to North Port and her claiming whatever supposedly to his dad, this was far from her first time of claiming something like this and naming a time.
I have to tell ya one other thing I have to wonder is what does Stephan have on her... Fraud, something else? Because whether it is the murder, the SA or just something else in life, she seems to have some concern of not turning on him...
When this exchange of a few things, probably most interest part of the interview, like when the detective asked her why she would need a RULE for them not sleeping together, who needs that and why, man it became something and the BP said too, and oh why she would get an attorney or insist on one for someone having assaulted her daughter, the detective asked!, and this is when all the not evil stuff came up and so on, I mean that is impossible to ignore.... I don't need them either to show me, I have been seeing it all for myself... It is just confirming what I have been seeing...
IMO there was a rule for one thing because something had happened she knew about...
I asked before and know you are decided but will say I don't get that at all, and have been since even before we knew how much. I'm not and my tide is changing.
There are so MANY things for her to explain and even when she does, they are things no parent would do or acquiesce to.
Anyhow, my week is going to be something else with a big thing going on and hopefully as of next week, it is something off my plate for good.
As always, I enjoy this discussion big time, and wish I had more time to pinpoint the things I am talking of.
I will also say this, she is not off the hook imo. It just is not paramount to them right now but they have boxed a lot in and documented it...Again imo.
