PAUL & MAGGIE MURDAUGH: South Carolina vs. Alex Murdaugh for Double Homicide of wife & son *GUILTY*

1623728103817.png
This case is being kept pretty quiet, no major details released to speak of (other than it does say there were two different guns used), but no info regarding who found them, who called 911, very little else.

Of interest, the grandfather died just a few days after these murders and it sounds as if he was ill from various articles so probably not unexpected. I think of the typical motives, did grandpa have a big estate? How big in the overall family of grandpa's on down? They sound like a pretty well known family and a powerful one in their state, more on that in the article.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
I took it to mean he thinks Alex knows more than he is telling. That could mean he did it but it could also mean he knows or suspects who did, but cannot tell in case of blackmail or threats to other family members.
He would rat them out in an instant, if that was the case. The not looking for the killer and more concerned with the lawsuit speaks volumes.
 
Here's a Bloomberg podcast that explains possible appellate issues from a legal perspective. The first 21 minutes are directly regarding this case.

It helped explain in laymen terms which I appreciated. Hope it helps others too.
 
The case that keeps on giving.

From your link -

" Both said they believe all of the financial crimes Newman allowed in as evidence should not have been heard by the jury.

“Once they got that character information in that he’s a thief, he’s a liar, then it dictated this jury had to think he was a despicable human being and not to be believed. So it was about character, it wasn’t about motive. So as a result, our options were limited,” Harpootlian said. “Look, they won this case the day the judge bought into letting them put every piece of, you know, stealing from kids who lost their mother, from somebody with pancreatic cancer, somebody that’s a paraplegic. I mean, all of that two and a half weeks, by the time they got done with it, it didn’t matter about final argument. It didn’t matter about what we put up. He was, they would never ever, ever acquit him after that.”

Harpootlian said they debated about whether Murdaugh should take the stand in his own defense.


“He always wanted to take the stand,” Harpootlian said. “But once that information was in, I mean, if he had to take the stand to explain the kennel video, the lie, if you will, all of his credibility had been stripped away by the financial misdeeds.”

Newman sentenced Murdaugh to two consecutive life sentences for the murders.

Newman asked Murdaugh if he had anything he wanted to say before the sentencing.

“As I tell you again, I respect this court. But I am innocent. I would never under any circumstances hurt my wife Maggie and I would never under any circumstances hurt my son Paul-Paul,” Murdaugh said.


“And it might not have been you. It might have been the monster you become when you take 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 opioid pills. Maybe you become another person,” Newman replied, noting Murdaugh’s decadeslong addiction to painkillers.

Prosecutors asked for a life sentence to hold Murdaugh responsible for what they say are decades of lying, stealing and using his family’s considerable clout in their tiny county to his advantage.

The sentence carries no chance of parole."

(That's strange that prosecutors asked for a life sentence due to the lying and stealing and using his clout rather than the murder of his wife and child. It's like that was more important.)
 
Last edited:
Well he made the mistake about showing all the jury. And he made the decision about the financial info, which is grounds for appeal now so I am not so sure.
Every attorney for a client found guilty will be grasping straws to find a reason to file an appeal...as they should. They have nothing to lose by trying. Most of the time it fails, but they tried. Once in a great while it works. Most go through their appeals quite fast and then have nothing else left. Not very many attorneys are going to pass up the chance to make more money, too.
 
Here's a Bloomberg podcast that explains possible appellate issues from a legal perspective. The first 21 minutes are directly regarding this case.

It helped explain in laymen terms which I appreciated. Hope it helps others too.
Interesting. Especially the bit about right to silence and the fact he tried to contact prosecutors but they did not get back to him. Also the verdict coming back so quickly was explained simply, as well as the financial aspect.
 
Every attorney for a client found guilty will be grasping straws to find a reason to file an appeal...as they should. They have nothing to lose by trying. Most of the time it fails, but they tried. Once in a great while it works. Most go through their appeals quite fast and then have nothing else left. Not very many attorneys are going to pass up the chance to make more money, too.
The financial aspect being included in the trial is probably the biggest "straw" to be grasped. That showed how he lied and cheated clients so it set the scene for him to have to testify. In the UK, prior crimes are not allowed as evidence, as it is so prejudicial. Even the defendants criminal record is not allowed as evidence and no way would they be brought to court in shackles either so there are a lot of differences. As the judge decided to admit this prior evidence, then I can see it as good grounds for appeal.
 

A trial date in the family's wrongful death lawsuit against the Murdaughs, a once prominent and influential legal dynasty, is set for Aug. 14 — about four years after Beach's family filed the case against the Murdaugh family in 2019.
 

A trial date in the family's wrongful death lawsuit against the Murdaughs, a once prominent and influential legal dynasty, is set for Aug. 14 — about four years after Beach's family filed the case against the Murdaugh family in 2019.
I thought that any responsibility for the accident ended when Paul was murdered. I also thought Buster had settled this lawsuit a couple of months ago. Complicated case.

From the link -

"Prosecutors said the Beach lawsuit was a catalyst in Alex's decision to murder his wife and younger son as it threatened to expose his other numerous financial crimes. The disgraced attorney is accused of embezzling millions from his family's personal injury law firm and its clients.

A general view of Archers Creek Bridge in Beaufort, South Carolina. Paul Murdaugh was charged with the death of 19-year-old Mallory Beach after crashing his family's boat in 2019.

A general view of Archers Creek Bridge in Beaufort, South Carolina. Paul Murdaugh was charged with the death of 19-year-old Mallory Beach after crashing his family's boat in 2019. (Mark Sims for Fox News Digital)
The Beach family attorney filed a motion to force Alex to disclose his books and prove his dire financial straits. Three days before the murders, a hearing was scheduled to determine whether Alex would be compelled to share the sensitive information. Tinsley says he still does not have access to all of Alex's financial records, including the Murdaugh family's trust.

ALEX MURDAUGH'S SLAIN SON, PAUL, ALLEGEDLY STRANGLED EX-GIRLFRIEND

"There was a sense of relief that there was some measure of justice," Tinsley said of the Murdaugh trial and verdict, but "the fact that… things that happened in the civil case are even associated with" Alex's motive in the double murder is "not a pleasant feeling" for the Beach family.

A photo of the Murdaugh family taken days before Paul and Maggie Murdaugh were shot to death. From left, Buster, Paul, Maggie and Alex Murdaugh.

A photo of the Murdaugh family taken days before Paul and Maggie Murdaugh were shot to death. From left, Buster, Paul, Maggie and Alex Murdaugh. (Defense exhibit)

"They've taken a lot of comfort in the fact that there's been good that's happened as a result," he added.

The Beaches reached a settlement with Maggie's estate and Buster, Alex's sole surviving son, in January. The two remaining defendants in the case are Alex and Parker's Kitchen, a convenience store where Paul, who was then underage, is believed to have purchased alcohol for the excursion."
 
Last edited:
And the financial crimes prosecution is going ahead. They want their pound of flesh too.


It seems they want him prosecuted for these crimes and a sentence of life without parole, just in case he wins his murder appeal. The Satterfields have had their payout but still want him prosecuted.

From the link -

"South Carolina prosecutors will tie Alex Murdaugh "up in a pretzel" during his future financial crimes trial, according to Eric Bland, an attorney representing the family of deceased Murdaugh housekeeper Gloria Satterfield.

After a Colleton County jury found Murdaugh guilty of the June 2021 killing his wife and son, the former lawyer still faces trial for his 99 alleged financial crimes from 19 separate indictments, some of which he already admitted to on the witness stand during his murder trial.

"The question is is [Murdaugh] going to make the government go through the hurdles of doing it, or is he going to plead guilty?" Bland asked in an interview with Fox News Digital.

"I don't think he's going to plead guilty, because it'll put him in a position of now having only two more financial crimes to be convicted of, where he would end up getting life without parole, which would be a backstop if the murder conviction was ever reversed or remanded for a new trial. So, I think they're going to tie him up in a pretzel."

" Satterfield's sons will "absolutely" testify in a future trial against Murdaugh, their attorney said.

MURDAUGH FIRST RESPONDER REVEALS NEW CRIME SCENE DETAILS AFTER GUILTY VERDICT

The Satterfields recovered a multimillion-dollar settlement from their mother's death that was rightfully theirs after Murdaugh allegedly stole it. They even got an apology from the disgraced attorney, but they still want to "hold Alex accountable" for his other crimes, Bland said. "
 
Last edited:
HOORAY!!!!! I watched the "Netflix" 3 part documentary. He's a terrible person for alot of reasons. Paul was NOT a good person at all. He got away with murder. Maggie was a bully. The death of their housekeeper could have been her. IMO most likely. Not Paul. She really raised him. But he didn't get her values. He lived by the Murdaugh's.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,081
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom