PAUL & MAGGIE MURDAUGH: South Carolina vs. Alex Murdaugh for Double Homicide of wife & son *GUILTY*

1623728103817.png
This case is being kept pretty quiet, no major details released to speak of (other than it does say there were two different guns used), but no info regarding who found them, who called 911, very little else.

Of interest, the grandfather died just a few days after these murders and it sounds as if he was ill from various articles so probably not unexpected. I think of the typical motives, did grandpa have a big estate? How big in the overall family of grandpa's on down? They sound like a pretty well known family and a powerful one in their state, more on that in the article.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, thanks Tresir. State won their case on evidence not submitted until 20th Jan 2023. Trial began 5 days later.
Talk about sandbagging. Well played. And just wow.

If they had it for the first trial it may not have been a mistrial. It's a good thing they didn't stop trying to find it.
 
This is a good article, it has some to do with the trial and some to do with what's next.



AA18cbZ0.img
 

From the article -

In the Sunday segment, Bland explained how Randolph Murdaugh, Alex's brother, showed up to the scene where Smith's body was found and offered to represent Stephen's mother, Sandy.

"He supposedly showed up on the accident scene, and according to Sandy Smith, she received a telephone call from him where he offered to represent her, and she was very confused as to why she would need representation," Bland said.

"SLED [South Carolina Law Enforcement Division] now has been investigating it for a solid two years and nothing has been released; but now you heard on Friday the public is turning its attention back to that, what we consider to be a murder," Bland said.
 
Last edited:
May I ask and I hope y'all don't mind ...

Due to time constraints I can't follow case murdaugh like a proper crimewatcher ... but here, at very end ... I'm catching verdict result and trial highlights in "news" referencing a "smoking gun" snap chat video ... so ... and I beg your pardon and indulgence here ... News suggesting defense didn't know of this specific snap chat evidence b/4 trial?

When did prosecution get "smoking gun" snap chat (son's phone) video evidence admitted?
Was it after discovery and during trial - last minute?
Did defense miss this in discovery?
Was there argument over the submission of the snap chat evidence?
)
thanks muchly!
I, fortunately (unfortunately) did watch this entire trial. The State could not have introduced any evidence without providing it to the defense in the discovery motions.

The snapchat video was found after a subpoena was sent to Snap Inc because Paul's friends had seen it the evening of June 7th, 2021 and reported it to SLED and once received passed along to the defense.

The 'kennel' video was not found on Paul's iPhone until it was forensically unlocked in April 2022 and the defense was also made aware of this evidence prior to trial.

Got questions? Ask away.
 
I, fortunately (unfortunately) did watch this entire trial. The State could not have introduced any evidence without providing it to the defense in the discovery motions.

The snapchat video was found after a subpoena was sent to Snap Inc because Paul's friends had seen it the evening of June 7th, 2021 and reported it to SLED and once received passed along to the defense.

The 'kennel' video was not found on Paul's iPhone until it was forensically unlocked in April 2022 and the defense was also made aware of this evidence prior to trial.

Got questions? Ask away.
thanks so much!

So, defense was (or should have been) aware/prepared re: the defendant's voice on the kennel video as key evidence defendant was at the kennel when victims were killed ... ???
 
thanks so much!

So, defense was (or should have been) aware/prepared re: the defendant's voice on the kennel video as key evidence defendant was at the kennel when victims were killed ... ???
I don't think the kennel video was the Snapchat video. I think there are two videos but I am not certain which is which.

One is timed 7.56 pm and was sent to Paul's friends and the other is the 8.44 pm 'kennel' video, which was never sent to anyone.
 
Last edited:

Breaking Silence, Murdaugh Brother Says ‘Not Knowing Is the Worst Thing’​

After Alex Murdaugh’s trial ended in a conviction for the murders of his wife and son, his older brother Randy is still trying to understand what happened that night.

 

Breaking Silence, Murdaugh Brother Says ‘Not Knowing Is the Worst Thing’​

After Alex Murdaugh’s trial ended in a conviction for the murders of his wife and son, his older brother Randy is still trying to understand what happened that night.

So by his own logic of not believing anything his brother has said about that night, wouldn't that mean since he said he had nothing to do with it, you should automatically think it would mean he did? I get not being able to get your head there, but he's all but admitting that he believes his brother did it with his statement.

“He knows more than what he’s saying,” Randy said. “He’s not telling the truth, in my opinion, about everything there.”
 

it is my opinion that Harpoorlian should not have spoken on the Statehouse Floor about the trial & his 15 minutes of fame - unprofessional both as an attorney & Senator.​

Harpootlian addresses SC Senate colleages, critics after Murdaugh trial​


... took the floor of the state Senate Tuesday afternoon.

thanked his colleagues in the Senate for the emails they sent inquiring about his wellbeing during what he called a “maelstrom of a trial.”

“Now, I disagree with Judge [Clifton] Newman on some of the rulings he made. He ruled and we objected; it’s in the record,” he said. “The Supreme Court, Court of Appeals have a chance to look at that, and maybe even federal court. But that’s not based on bias. He just had a view of the law different from what I had.”

Harpootlian also addressed criticism he received from people who sent messages that called him a “piece of scum” or expressed hope that he would die of “rectal cancer.” “Not all of them wished rectal cancer on me, but most were fairly critical,” he said.

“While they’re very familiar with the Second Amendment, they apparently haven’t read the Fourth, the Fifth, the Sixth and the Eighth Amendments that [guarantee our freedoms] of ourselves and our property,” he said. “You don’t have to convince me you’re innocent for me to represent you. That’s not the issue. The issue is, can the state prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? Once you decide that position, you are free to do what is in your client’s best interest.”

He also had three words for people he said slept outside for nights to get a seat in the gallery during the trial: “Get some help.”

 

it is my opinion that Harpoorlian should not have spoken on the Statehouse Floor about the trial & his 15 minutes of fame - unprofessional both as an attorney & Senator.​

Harpootlian addresses SC Senate colleages, critics after Murdaugh trial​


... took the floor of the state Senate Tuesday afternoon.

thanked his colleagues in the Senate for the emails they sent inquiring about his wellbeing during what he called a “maelstrom of a trial.”

“Now, I disagree with Judge [Clifton] Newman on some of the rulings he made. He ruled and we objected; it’s in the record,” he said. “The Supreme Court, Court of Appeals have a chance to look at that, and maybe even federal court. But that’s not based on bias. He just had a view of the law different from what I had.”

Harpootlian also addressed criticism he received from people who sent messages that called him a “piece of scum” or expressed hope that he would die of “rectal cancer.” “Not all of them wished rectal cancer on me, but most were fairly critical,” he said.

“While they’re very familiar with the Second Amendment, they apparently haven’t read the Fourth, the Fifth, the Sixth and the Eighth Amendments that [guarantee our freedoms] of ourselves and our property,” he said. “You don’t have to convince me you’re innocent for me to represent you. That’s not the issue. The issue is, can the state prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? Once you decide that position, you are free to do what is in your client’s best interest.”

He also had three words for people he said slept outside for nights to get a seat in the gallery during the trial: “Get some help.”

this from the same man pictured below during the trial .. no photoshop involved

dceda7d4-59fd-462c-98d5-e10f1b712974.JPG
 

it is my opinion that Harpoorlian should not have spoken on the Statehouse Floor about the trial & his 15 minutes of fame - unprofessional both as an attorney & Senator.​

Harpootlian addresses SC Senate colleages, critics after Murdaugh trial​


... took the floor of the state Senate Tuesday afternoon.

thanked his colleagues in the Senate for the emails they sent inquiring about his wellbeing during what he called a “maelstrom of a trial.”

“Now, I disagree with Judge [Clifton] Newman on some of the rulings he made. He ruled and we objected; it’s in the record,” he said. “The Supreme Court, Court of Appeals have a chance to look at that, and maybe even federal court. But that’s not based on bias. He just had a view of the law different from what I had.”

Harpootlian also addressed criticism he received from people who sent messages that called him a “piece of scum” or expressed hope that he would die of “rectal cancer.” “Not all of them wished rectal cancer on me, but most were fairly critical,” he said.

“While they’re very familiar with the Second Amendment, they apparently haven’t read the Fourth, the Fifth, the Sixth and the Eighth Amendments that [guarantee our freedoms] of ourselves and our property,” he said. “You don’t have to convince me you’re innocent for me to represent you. That’s not the issue. The issue is, can the state prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? Once you decide that position, you are free to do what is in your client’s best interest.”

He also had three words for people he said slept outside for nights to get a seat in the gallery during the trial: “Get some help.”

So he's admitting that his client is guilty with this statement???

“While they’re very familiar with the Second Amendment, they apparently haven’t read the Fourth, the Fifth, the Sixth and the Eighth Amendments that [guarantee our freedoms] of ourselves and our property,” he said. “You don’t have to convince me you’re innocent for me to represent you. That’s not the issue. The issue is, can the state prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? Once you decide that position, you are free to do what is in your client’s best interest.”
 

it is my opinion that Harpoorlian should not have spoken on the Statehouse Floor about the trial & his 15 minutes of fame - unprofessional both as an attorney & Senator.​

Harpootlian addresses SC Senate colleages, critics after Murdaugh trial​


... took the floor of the state Senate Tuesday afternoon.

thanked his colleagues in the Senate for the emails they sent inquiring about his wellbeing during what he called a “maelstrom of a trial.”

“Now, I disagree with Judge [Clifton] Newman on some of the rulings he made. He ruled and we objected; it’s in the record,” he said. “The Supreme Court, Court of Appeals have a chance to look at that, and maybe even federal court. But that’s not based on bias. He just had a view of the law different from what I had.”

Harpootlian also addressed criticism he received from people who sent messages that called him a “piece of scum” or expressed hope that he would die of “rectal cancer.” “Not all of them wished rectal cancer on me, but most were fairly critical,” he said.

“While they’re very familiar with the Second Amendment, they apparently haven’t read the Fourth, the Fifth, the Sixth and the Eighth Amendments that [guarantee our freedoms] of ourselves and our property,” he said. “You don’t have to convince me you’re innocent for me to represent you. That’s not the issue. The issue is, can the state prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? Once you decide that position, you are free to do what is in your client’s best interest.”

He also had three words for people he said slept outside for nights to get a seat in the gallery during the trial: “Get some help.”


You're 100% right. The dude is skeevey. I hope his constituents vote him out next election.
 
So by his own logic of not believing anything his brother has said about that night, wouldn't that mean since he said he had nothing to do with it, you should automatically think it would mean he did? I get not being able to get your head there, but he's all but admitting that he believes his brother did it with his statement.

“He knows more than what he’s saying,” Randy said. “He’s not telling the truth, in my opinion, about everything there.”
I took it to mean he thinks Alex knows more than he is telling. That could mean he did it but it could also mean he knows or suspects who did, but cannot tell in case of blackmail or threats to other family members.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,087
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom