I think they are gathering evidence for the appeal by the sounds of all this. But breaking rules while they are doing it.
I haven't watched any of the videos. I am usually put off by the length of them in a lot of cases. I prefer to read mainly.
Appeal plus basically trying to turn public opinion, plant seeds and perhaps profit/make money...?
I can identify. There was a time I never watched videos nor could imagine doing so, wasn't my thing but I've come to appreciate them, especially good ones that give me good coverage or an account of the important facts in a case weeding out the other stuff or finally with attorneys, like her, explaining things with respect to the law, etc. that I don't think one gets from reading in the same way.
I was just like you, I wanted all in print and to read it. And I certainly lack time to watch many videos or read all but now am so used to videos, that a good one again catching me up and explaining I appreciate.
One thing I do remain preferring "print" for is instructions. If I am fixing something, putting something together, etc., I want step by step in print, not in video lol. Although I've finally come to realize with that too, video can have its benefits depending on what it is.
Finally, print just can't get across sometimes what a video can. And there are just some really good ones to follow out there these days. An article can't replay a press conference for instances and discuss each part while playing it just for an example.
Anyhow, I'm just saying she explains why Alex AND his attorneys are in the wrong and can't do as they've been doing, etc. legally. And you asked about that so apparently you haven't read the reasons in print. It would answer a lot of your questions is all I'm saying.
Alex is SOMETHING ELSE isn't he.... And not a good something else... And his attorney... Still seem to think they can do anything and are above and immune to consequences even though he has HAD consequences and sits in a cell and has a conviction...
