CO SUZANNE MORPHEW: Missing from Chaffee County, CO - 10 May 2020 - Age 49 *Found Deceased*

A Chaffee County woman is missing after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned, sparking a search involving more than 100 emergency personnel.

The Chaffee County Communications Center received a report on Sunday at 5:46 p.m. regarding a missing woman in the area of County Road 225 and West Highway 50.


Anybody who has information on Morphew’s whereabouts is asked to call the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office at 719-539-2596 or Chaffee County Crime Stoppers at 719-539-2599.


1589412136362.png


edited by staff to add media link
 
Last edited:
To prevent false convictions. The prosecution needs to have irrefutable evidence of guilt. A confession is a starting point. I have seen with a confession, Before trial. The person could not have done it. And unfortunately long after being in prison. By DNA usually.
Missouri sounds majorly corrupt based on what she is saying. In most cases, they don't charge without enough solid evidence. In our case, it totally HINGED on the results of the expert autopsy, not the main one, the skull one sent out we waited months on end for. Had the results not confirmed what they expected, he wouldn't have been charged, or at least not with murder.

I gotta tell ya even I think this world has gone to sh*t but it isn't in wrongful convictions it is in NOT charging these days or being too SOFT and that murder doesn't deserve life or even many years.

Even so, most are not framing people for murder even with the disgust I have in many and the system, I still don't believe most are like that and it takes a group generally to do such and pull it off. I'm not a conspiracy person and that's what it would take to do as talked of. I don't deny it CAN happen but to the point anyone thinks this is common and these days? Nah. It's a real reach.

Now like in Vanessa Guillen's case, I'd say yes there was a culture, power and conspiracy so to speak. But that's where they are PROTECTING their own, caring less about the victim and not investigating in the way they should. I'd say THAT is far more common.
 
Children may not know but every adult that is not challenged in some way knows what their rights are. Do they ever expect to be in such a situation? If innocent I'd say not. If guilty I'd hope they had a brain cell and could realize that could happen.

I intensely disliked the teacher on Peanuts by the way. Snoopy rocked. As did Woodstock. The rest of the crew is pretty messed up and their parents should come home and supervise their children.

We have had years now of crime shows every where one turns. I am talking FICTIONAL shows. Law and Order and we could all name tons more.

I disagree. Most people do not know how the process, system and court works and even what the standard filing is of various documents, unless the follow these kind of true crime things/sites BUT all know their basic rights or most all do. The crime shows fiction even show such. The MOST watched shows many of them.

What I notice more is the court process or filings. Many will think an affidavit is automatically fact. It is NOT. We have seen recently where some think a defense filing to the supreme court is fact and a ruling by the supreme court. Duh. Not to make fun but come on.

Who but the most simplest blocked from any kind of life do not know you have a right to an attorney? Or have to be read your rights? That anything you say can be used against you in a court of law? I learned that in grade school. Maybe it is the fault of the schools. Now there's another subject... But let's blame them now. And I've seen it in many as how from back in the day Perry Mason, Columbo, etc. to the now even more prolific law and order type shows. EVERYONE knows this short of the most sheltered or ignorant person. They may not know the criminal court process etc but they know this.

So no, I don't believe most don't know this. And since we are in the Morphew thread I will tie that in. Do you think Barry at his age did not know he did not have to talk to LE or could lawyer up? Really? Long before charges? Of course he knew. What 99.9 percent are doing is thinking they are smarter and can get out of it, sway the direction, etc.

It is my belief to this day that Barry never for a moment thought some housewife from nowhere Colorado would turn into big news. He never thought he wouldn't be believed or be able to point it in another direction right off and with his alibi and all. He never believed detectives from podunkville would do an investigation and he wasn't far wrong from the screw ups that first night. You know after all he is smarter than the average bear. cop, investigator, mountain lion, elk or anyone or anything. Or as Linda calls him Bear-Bear or is it Barr-Barr...

As far as other countries, most also don't do DP and won't extradite to here if the person is facing the DP. They are softer yet on crime. Unless you talk third world countries that still stone people and worse. That doesn't mean anything to me in citing the other countries. The soft bit is not soley on us OMG have you looked at sentences in other countries or how limited they are in their investigators being allowed tools to solve anything or charge?

Sorry @Tresir but yours is one of them. A year or two ago I was watching some British true crime series on like cold cases or like a forensic file, 48 hours or some such. Several. And I became absolutely disgusted that not only are they as bad as we have gotten but may have been so first with no life sentences for murder, light sentences, and no true sentencing (full real time served) and more. I'd listen to these horrific cases which I knew nothing about and at the end would be the sentence and I'd be like WHAT??
We got rid of our DP decades ago and yes we can be soft on crime - the woman who helped with a false alibi for the murdering school caretaker of the two young girls who only got a few years and a new identity for example.
 
We got rid of our DP decades ago and yes we can be soft on crime - the woman who helped with a false alibi for the murdering school caretaker of the two young girls who only got a few years and a new identity for example.
I can't even remember all of them or the name of the show but I watched show after show for months and I'd be so mad at the perp and the very bad crimes they protrayed through the show generally all murder of course, and NEVER would the perp get a life sentence it seemed. I don't even mean the DP. I honestly thought a few years back it was just us, as I was learning, not sentencing harshly for murder but that one opened my eyes. It has been getting soft in all of the "first world" countries for a long time right under all of our noses, our people in charge just kind of slip these things in and one day each of us notices or one at a time when it is too late and we say when the heck did this b.s. start? OR letting ones that were sentenced appropriately years ago OUT.

The one you mention sounds like a real gem of a woman. I watched many, can't even tell ya all of them. It was some show of yours I could watch old ones of, etc (not that old) on YouTube similar like I said to our shows like that on true crimes/cases. A weekly one I would assume.

You follow our crime but I have only followed a handful of crimes in other countries largely because they don't make news or news does not come out on them. Linda of It's a Crime does follow some of her own Canadian one but largely follows ours as more info is released on them although not always, than in many countries.

Anyhow, not knocking your country as you know, but saying we are far from the only one who has changed/been pulling this sh*t on a soft on crime thing underneath the noses of all of us who would never have agreed if we had known and do NOT agree.
 

POSTED BY: TERRY WEST DECEMBER 22, 2023

11th Judicial District Attorney Linda Stanley has responded to a list of allegations that could lead to her losing her law license.

In the 42-page court filing revealed by 9News, Stanley admits that she launched an investigation into former district court judge Ramsey Lama and his family because he ruled against her in the high-profile murder case involving Barry Morphew, who had been charged in the murder of his wife Suzanne Morphew. Stanley cites an online petition from change.org filled with conspiracy theories as her basis for the investigation.

In October, the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel alleged Stanley conducted a domestic violence investigation into Judge Lama following the unfavorable rulings. The DA allegedly reached out to several prosecutors, “encouraging them to investigate whether Judge Lama ever abused his ex-wife.”

The Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office reportedly refused to investigate since Stanley “had no good source for the investigation.” Stanley eventually enlisted her own investigator to interview Judge Lama’s ex-wife. The complaint alleges, “Stanley used her position and office’s resources in a manner intended to prevent others, including Judge Lama, from effectively performing their roles in the criminal justice system.”

In a different murder case her office was prosecuting, Stanley did a TV interview with KRDO in Colorado Springs. After receiving backlash for making what many people felt were inappropriate comments about the pending case which involved the death of a baby, her filing claims she never thought the interview would be aired. Even though she was speaking to a camera while wearing a microphone.

Stanley told the Supreme Court this week she thought the interview was “off the record.”
 

POSTED BY: TERRY WEST DECEMBER 22, 2023

11th Judicial District Attorney Linda Stanley has responded to a list of allegations that could lead to her losing her law license.

In the 42-page court filing revealed by 9News, Stanley admits that she launched an investigation into former district court judge Ramsey Lama and his family because he ruled against her in the high-profile murder case involving Barry Morphew, who had been charged in the murder of his wife Suzanne Morphew. Stanley cites an online petition from change.org filled with conspiracy theories as her basis for the investigation.

In October, the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel alleged Stanley conducted a domestic violence investigation into Judge Lama following the unfavorable rulings. The DA allegedly reached out to several prosecutors, “encouraging them to investigate whether Judge Lama ever abused his ex-wife.”

The Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office reportedly refused to investigate since Stanley “had no good source for the investigation.” Stanley eventually enlisted her own investigator to interview Judge Lama’s ex-wife. The complaint alleges, “Stanley used her position and office’s resources in a manner intended to prevent others, including Judge Lama, from effectively performing their roles in the criminal justice system.”

In a different murder case her office was prosecuting, Stanley did a TV interview with KRDO in Colorado Springs. After receiving backlash for making what many people felt were inappropriate comments about the pending case which involved the death of a baby, her filing claims she never thought the interview would be aired. Even though she was speaking to a camera while wearing a microphone.

Stanley told the Supreme Court this week she thought the interview was “off the record.”
I'm not going to defend her as had she not made a few of the choices she did, there wouldn't be much basis to this but I do think most are not that bad but she did give some ammo. I DO KNOW however there is an entirely different side to this and some of the ones after her and that county are also NOT ones that would come up smelling like roses. The judge, the sheriff and a whole lot more and some I have my own opinion on aside from her.

In fact I'm disgusted with just about every investigation and crime and trial I've seen in Colorado AND with their secrecy and laws. Stauch would be the only one that I don't have a lot to say about.

This one and the sh*t going on is DEFINITELY politics and infighting and justice then goes out the window.

I have no problem if Suzanne's body and anything else found leads to Barry and charges that it be charged in THAT county, HOWEVER, I have no reason to think they're any better. We can see though.

I've seen very questionable things in more than one area and trial in Colorado. Just as I've seen Barry's defense firm before and their ways. And not in the same location at all.

The Stanley thing is a witch hunt but some things like not keeping up her licensing and going on shows were not wise. These things though are generally piddly sh*t and results in nothing for most attorneys. The only other thing I'll say is she wants Barry prosecuted and knows he did this and worked to keep her promise of charging the case. And make no mistake about it, that judge is questionable.

None of these opinions are based on the opinion of mine that Barry is guilty. The would stand independent of that as my opinion.
 

BY JORDAN ON JANUARY 12, 2024

(Update: The Office of Attorney Regulation ordered a 10-day hearing June 10 – 21 over the matters brought in the complaint against District Attorney Linda Stanley)

As the Tribune went to press on Tuesday, 11th Judicial District Attorney Linda Stanley faced the hearing Judge for the Office of Attorney Regulation (OAR), a branch of the Colorado Supreme Court, for a series of allegations that could end in her disbarment as an attorney. According to Tribune sources, Stanley was offered a one-year disbarment by the Office of Attorney Regulation, but she refused it and has since used taxpayer dollars to fund her legal defense.

Stanley was accused by the OAR of intimidating a Judge of the 11th Judicial District by starting an unfounded investigation after her team had been punished for violating evidence discovery rules in the high-profile Suzanne Morphew murder prosecution. In addition, she was accused of legal defamation of a defendant by giving an interview to a news station. In that interview, she made defamatory statements about the defendant that forced every Judge in the 11th Judicial District to recuse themselves from the case because they had seen the television interview. The remarks by Stanley were in violation of the code of ethics for attorneys that presume that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. The case had to be moved to the 4th Judicial District, which is based out of El Paso County.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

More at link. ~Summer
 

BY JORDAN ON JANUARY 12, 2024

(Update: The Office of Attorney Regulation ordered a 10-day hearing June 10 – 21 over the matters brought in the complaint against District Attorney Linda Stanley)

As the Tribune went to press on Tuesday, 11th Judicial District Attorney Linda Stanley faced the hearing Judge for the Office of Attorney Regulation (OAR), a branch of the Colorado Supreme Court, for a series of allegations that could end in her disbarment as an attorney. According to Tribune sources, Stanley was offered a one-year disbarment by the Office of Attorney Regulation, but she refused it and has since used taxpayer dollars to fund her legal defense.

Stanley was accused by the OAR of intimidating a Judge of the 11th Judicial District by starting an unfounded investigation after her team had been punished for violating evidence discovery rules in the high-profile Suzanne Morphew murder prosecution. In addition, she was accused of legal defamation of a defendant by giving an interview to a news station. In that interview, she made defamatory statements about the defendant that forced every Judge in the 11th Judicial District to recuse themselves from the case because they had seen the television interview. The remarks by Stanley were in violation of the code of ethics for attorneys that presume that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. The case had to be moved to the 4th Judicial District, which is based out of El Paso County.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

More at link. ~Summer
June??? No rush clearly.

I don't know. This one requires some back knowledge and reading between the lines some. And even if one has or does that, for me, I'm still not sure. There was a LOT of politics and good ol' boy kind of stuff going on in this lil county before she was elected and when she was, she ousted one of them.

She didn't help herself though with not keeping up on her licensing or talking on news or podcasts and so on BUT one has to compare that to some who DO in some high profile cases and they aren't in trouble for it.

I don't know. I do know there are powers that be that want to stay in power and a "club".


If charges are brought again in this one I am all for it being in the county she was found in but I don't know that they are any better but the judge who handled this in Barry's county sure he heck need to be gone. And for reasons not to do with Stanley. MUCH of what he did and did NOT UNDERSTAND (or did he....) was inappropriate and unfair. While they have a little power club there, they are also small and nothing but they are the big kahunas in their opinion in their county and have to exercise their power and care less about justice. There are so many things in this you won't see in the news that ARE fact.

I'd call this case my most hotly and intensely followed and top one but of course it cooled off. I followed it majorly. Before Daybell, before Stauch, before many ones of the last few years.

Imo the judge is bad news as is many in the club in the county.

And don't get me started on Iris Eytan from Denvuh CO.
 

by: Morgan Whitley
Posted: Jan 18, 2024 / 09:49 AM MST
Updated: Jan 18, 2024 / 05:10 PM MST

DENVER (KDVR) — An attorney for the Federal Bureau of Investigation has issued a motion to dismiss a case against two agents filed by Barry Morphew in 2023.

Morphew filed a complaint against the district attorney and several other prosecutors in 2023, after claiming allegations of misconduct that led to his arrest in the case of his missing wife, Suzanne Morphew.

According to a motion of dismissal document obtained by FOX31, Morphew sued FBI Special Agents Jonathan Grusing and Kenneth Harris. Morphew is seeking damages from the agents’ personal assets through the U.S. Supreme Court case Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents.


In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts could award financial damages in cases where a person’s constitutional rights were violated by the FBI.

Morphew is allegedly invoking the Bivens case as a reason to seek damages. However, the FBI agents’ attorney cited the 2007 Wilkie v. Robbins case and said “…the right to maintain a claim for damages against a federal official under Bivens ‘is not an automatic entitlement . . . and in most instances [the Supreme Court has] found a Bivens remedy unjustified.”

The document claims that Grusing and Harris are immune from personal liability because “Morphew fails to plead nonconclusory facts showing that they violated any clearly established constitutional right.”

For these reasons, the agents’ attorney is asking the court to dismiss the case against them.
 

by: Morgan Whitley
Posted: Jan 18, 2024 / 09:49 AM MST
Updated: Jan 18, 2024 / 05:10 PM MST

DENVER (KDVR) — An attorney for the Federal Bureau of Investigation has issued a motion to dismiss a case against two agents filed by Barry Morphew in 2023.

Morphew filed a complaint against the district attorney and several other prosecutors in 2023, after claiming allegations of misconduct that led to his arrest in the case of his missing wife, Suzanne Morphew.

According to a motion of dismissal document obtained by FOX31, Morphew sued FBI Special Agents Jonathan Grusing and Kenneth Harris. Morphew is seeking damages from the agents’ personal assets through the U.S. Supreme Court case Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents.

In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts could award financial damages in cases where a person’s constitutional rights were violated by the FBI.

Morphew is allegedly invoking the Bivens case as a reason to seek damages. However, the FBI agents’ attorney cited the 2007 Wilkie v. Robbins case and said “…the right to maintain a claim for damages against a federal official under Bivens ‘is not an automatic entitlement . . . and in most instances [the Supreme Court has] found a Bivens remedy unjustified.”

The document claims that Grusing and Harris are immune from personal liability because “Morphew fails to plead nonconclusory facts showing that they violated any clearly established constitutional right.”

For these reasons, the agents’ attorney is asking the court to dismiss the case against them.
Barry and his attorney are just special. Very. Sue the FBI. Profit off your wife's death. More. Just so special.

DISMISS IT!

Show that Iris screwed up and dismiss it.

Sounds like Bivens rarely flies.

VERY disgusted with the likes of Barry and his attorney and I'm sorry but also with HIS children. Might as well call them that because it's true. Lawsuit money might keep them in the lifestyle they expect.

Like in most cases,there is a VICTIM here. Her name is Suzanne. Suzanne Moorman. I think I'll drop the Morphew name as well in favor of the family that truly cared about her. Her own.
 

by Ellen Dumm
posted on February 15, 2024

It was a spectacular fall day in the mountain community of Salida, CO, as the Clerk and Recorder’s Office staff kept busy in the basement of the courthouse, processing mail ballots for the 2020 general election with Joseph Biden and Donald Trump at the top of the ticket.

Processing the ballots is a rigorous, detailed regiment that feels a little like balancing your checkbook to the penny every few minutes all day long. County clerks hire citizen election judges to partner with their staffs to run elections in the rush of the final few days.

Every voted ballot returned to the county has an electronic trail that can be traced back to the voter (but not how they voted) and if it was returned by mail, deposited into a drop box, or voted in person at a vote center.

On October 22, 2020, a large number of ballots arrived, promising that the basement crew would be working into evening hours. And suddenly, the beehive of activity abruptly halted. County Clerk Lori Mitchell checked a list of voters with signature verification issues and a name jumped out: Suzanne Morphew. She asked everyone in the basement to stop work.

Suzanne Morphew had not been seen for more than five months; she was reported missing on Mother’s Day 2020 when she allegedly went for a mountain bike ride and never returned. In the ensuing weeks, the entire county had been searching for clues as to her whereabouts. Suzanne Morphew’s photo was on a large banner at the local Walmart, handmade “missing” handouts were all over town, national stories popped up, online true-crime detective groups formed, podcasts were devoted to Suzanne’s mystery.

Yet Mitchell was staring at evidence that Suzanne’s ballot had been returned via mail. Every voter is required to sign their ballot to be matched against signatures on file. The signature line on this envelope had been left eerily blank. However, to the right of that blank line was a witness signature of Barry Morphew, Suzanne’s husband.

Mitchell quickly called the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office, the District Attorney’s Office and the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office. Reassured that she was following protocol to legally isolate the ballot, the ballot processing continued. A deputy soon arrived to collect the evidence and asked several questions. Mitchell was able to print a report from the election system that answered exactly from where and when it had arrived at the courthouse. This ballot had been mailed from the Morphews’ home west of Salida.

When unopened voted ballots arrive in sealed boxes at the processing center, they are fed through a sorting machine in small batches so they can be located easily in case there is an issue to resolve. Ballots are separated from the envelope containing personal information, so the right to a private vote is preserved.

The machine takes an image of every signature that is electronically sent to bipartisan election judge teams to compare the signature to others on file. If either judge flags the signature, it goes on a problem list to be resolved. A letter is sent to each voter who has been flagged so they have the opportunity to resolve the issue and their vote can be counted. No reply ever came back from the letter to Suzanne Morphew.

On October, 22, 2020, Suzanne Morphew had not yet been declared dead. If she had, her name would have been removed from the statewide voter list that is matched regularly to death certificates. Colorado also matches a multi-state database for registered voters who die in other states and local obituaries to maintain accurate election records. Signature verification is yet another method to ensure the intended voter actually cast the ballot.

When Barry Morphew was confronted by investigators, he admitted voting the ballot because he “knew” Suzanne would have wanted to vote for Donald Trump and he wanted Trump to have the “extra vote.” He said he no idea it was illegal to cast a vote for a spouse. The district attorney’s office charged Barry Morphew with one count of forgery and one count of a mail ballot offense. He pleaded guilty to a forgery charge and was given a deferred judgment with supervised probation that ended last summer.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

More at link. ~Summer
 

Author: Wilson Beese (9NEWS), Amanda Kesting
Published: 8:16 PM MST February 16, 2024
Updated: 9:53 PM MST February 16, 2024

SALIDA, Colo. — The lead prosecutor in the case against Barry Morphew, who was accused of killing his wife Suzanne, has been accused of retaliation against the judge presiding over the now-dropped case.

The Attorney Regulation Counsel on Thursday filed a complaint against Mark Hurlbert, a deputy district attorney for the 11th Judicial District Attorney's Office. The complaint, which was filed with the state Supreme Court, accuses Hurlbert of joining an effort by DA Linda Stanley to discredit Judge Ramsey Lama. It also accuses Hurlbert of not disclosing evidence and expert testimony to the defense in the time frame that is required.

The accusations revolve around the high-profile case involving Barry Morphew, who was charged with murder in the death of his wife Suzanne Morphew in 2020. The charges were dropped just days before the trial was set to begin.

The complaint includes text messages between Hurlbert and Stanley where they discuss investigating Lama after a series of rulings against the prosecution.

In one of the messages, the complaint says Hurlbert texted the prosecution team, "Do all of you have some time to talk tonight? Judge is messing with us again."

It says Hurlbert confirmed or agreed with the prosecution's decision to enlist its own investigator to interview the former wife of Lama, in an effort to uncover information about Lama that would be cause for recusal or disqualification in the case.

e17d4c7d-4ed2-4533-9203-19d772c78659_1920x1080.jpg


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More at link. ~Summer
 

by Ellen Dumm
posted on February 15, 2024

It was a spectacular fall day in the mountain community of Salida, CO, as the Clerk and Recorder’s Office staff kept busy in the basement of the courthouse, processing mail ballots for the 2020 general election with Joseph Biden and Donald Trump at the top of the ticket.

Processing the ballots is a rigorous, detailed regiment that feels a little like balancing your checkbook to the penny every few minutes all day long. County clerks hire citizen election judges to partner with their staffs to run elections in the rush of the final few days.

Every voted ballot returned to the county has an electronic trail that can be traced back to the voter (but not how they voted) and if it was returned by mail, deposited into a drop box, or voted in person at a vote center.

On October 22, 2020, a large number of ballots arrived, promising that the basement crew would be working into evening hours. And suddenly, the beehive of activity abruptly halted. County Clerk Lori Mitchell checked a list of voters with signature verification issues and a name jumped out: Suzanne Morphew. She asked everyone in the basement to stop work.

Suzanne Morphew had not been seen for more than five months; she was reported missing on Mother’s Day 2020 when she allegedly went for a mountain bike ride and never returned. In the ensuing weeks, the entire county had been searching for clues as to her whereabouts. Suzanne Morphew’s photo was on a large banner at the local Walmart, handmade “missing” handouts were all over town, national stories popped up, online true-crime detective groups formed, podcasts were devoted to Suzanne’s mystery.

Yet Mitchell was staring at evidence that Suzanne’s ballot had been returned via mail. Every voter is required to sign their ballot to be matched against signatures on file. The signature line on this envelope had been left eerily blank. However, to the right of that blank line was a witness signature of Barry Morphew, Suzanne’s husband.

Mitchell quickly called the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office, the District Attorney’s Office and the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office. Reassured that she was following protocol to legally isolate the ballot, the ballot processing continued. A deputy soon arrived to collect the evidence and asked several questions. Mitchell was able to print a report from the election system that answered exactly from where and when it had arrived at the courthouse. This ballot had been mailed from the Morphews’ home west of Salida.

When unopened voted ballots arrive in sealed boxes at the processing center, they are fed through a sorting machine in small batches so they can be located easily in case there is an issue to resolve. Ballots are separated from the envelope containing personal information, so the right to a private vote is preserved.

The machine takes an image of every signature that is electronically sent to bipartisan election judge teams to compare the signature to others on file. If either judge flags the signature, it goes on a problem list to be resolved. A letter is sent to each voter who has been flagged so they have the opportunity to resolve the issue and their vote can be counted. No reply ever came back from the letter to Suzanne Morphew.

On October, 22, 2020, Suzanne Morphew had not yet been declared dead. If she had, her name would have been removed from the statewide voter list that is matched regularly to death certificates. Colorado also matches a multi-state database for registered voters who die in other states and local obituaries to maintain accurate election records. Signature verification is yet another method to ensure the intended voter actually cast the ballot.

When Barry Morphew was confronted by investigators, he admitted voting the ballot because he “knew” Suzanne would have wanted to vote for Donald Trump and he wanted Trump to have the “extra vote.” He said he no idea it was illegal to cast a vote for a spouse. The district attorney’s office charged Barry Morphew with one count of forgery and one count of a mail ballot offense. He pleaded guilty to a forgery charge and was given a deferred judgment with supervised probation that ended last summer.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

More at link. ~Summer

That guy is no mastermind. Have we heard anything about what they found out about the body and/or it was found?
 
That guy is no mastermind. Have we heard anything about what they found out about the body and/or it was found?
I think Stanley is trying anything she can ATM as she is feeling the heat herself. The Coroner's report is another county - El Paso - and I don't think we have heard anything yet.
 
Well I was going to bed but just before i did I ran into this. Oh Boy.

@Tresir and anyone else interested, this is what YT does versus other sources. Not even Court TV and L & C do the FOIA requests and keep on them. They will likely now that they know there is such follow with news. MAYBE.

I am not always a Plunder fan, I"ve had moments, not so man recently but a few years back. I know EXACTLY who is being talked of and this is but a dip into the barrel of the real b.s. that has went on in this case. THIS IS BODYCAM with the judge. NEVER expected.

I haven't even watched it all yet, likely will and go to work with no sleep whatsoever. THERE is SO much that has went on in this case that will never be found in the news BUT that can be backed up WITH DOCUMENTATION by some YTERS. NOT claims. FACT. And I could point to a few other ones and videoes over this same stuff that now we have some bodycam about.

I've said it before and will again there is political sh*t and more going on in Chafee County and that's the tip of the iceberg and NOTHING in this case and it won't be seen on news.

Again, FOIA request.

Which a lot of GOOD YTERS do and pay for. Don't know what is wrong with news channels who seem to bother doing no such thing but will run with it likely once they have a body cam to back it UP. That they could have gotten themselves.

 

By Jennifer McRae
Updated on: April 24, 2024 / 4:58 PM MDT / CBS Colorado

The autopsy has been completed on the remains of missing Colorado mom Suzanne Morphew, nearly four years after she was first reported missing. Morphew's remains were located last fall during a search on Sept. 22, 2023, in the area of Moffat in Saguache County.

Morphew was last seen on Mother's Day nearly four years ago, May 10, 2020. Her disappearance made national headlines and the investigation was featured on the CBS News show "48 Hours."

Suzanne Morphew left behind two teenage daughters and a husband, Barry Morphew, who was not only the prime suspect in her disappearance, he was also charged with her murder.

Investigators were searching in the area of Moffat in Saguache County on an investigation not related to the Morphew disappearance when her remains were discovered.

Suzanne disappeared after leaving her home for a bike ride on Mother's Day 2020 and what happened next remains a mystery. Her bicycle was found down a steep ravine off Chaffee County Road 225 from Highway 50. Deputies said that the bicycle did not look like it was involved in a crash and there was not any blood at the scene. After she went missing, Barry Morphew told CBS News Colorado that he believed she was abducted before he was subsequently arrested for her murder in 2021.

A judge dismissed the case against Barry Morphew in April 2022. At the time, the 11th Judicial District Attorney, Linda Stanley, filed the motion to "dismiss without prejudice" which means that prosecutors could file charges against Barry Morphew at a later date.

The attorney for Barry Morphew released a statement on behalf of his family following the discovery of his wife's remains, that read in part, "From what we know, Barry is as innocent as he was from Day 1. DA Stanley and law enforcement got it wrong. We hope the authorities will quickly admit their wrongful persecution of Barry, an innocent man, to treat the Morphews like the victims they are, and charge the person(s) responsible for Suzanne's killing."

No arrests have been made since her remains have been located. The public is asked to continue to report any information about this case by calling (719) 312-7530.

According to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, the report from the Chaffee County Medical Examiner is expected to be released next week.
 

By Jennifer McRae
Updated on: April 24, 2024 / 4:58 PM MDT / CBS Colorado

The autopsy has been completed on the remains of missing Colorado mom Suzanne Morphew, nearly four years after she was first reported missing. Morphew's remains were located last fall during a search on Sept. 22, 2023, in the area of Moffat in Saguache County.

Morphew was last seen on Mother's Day nearly four years ago, May 10, 2020. Her disappearance made national headlines and the investigation was featured on the CBS News show "48 Hours."

Suzanne Morphew left behind two teenage daughters and a husband, Barry Morphew, who was not only the prime suspect in her disappearance, he was also charged with her murder.

Investigators were searching in the area of Moffat in Saguache County on an investigation not related to the Morphew disappearance when her remains were discovered.

Suzanne disappeared after leaving her home for a bike ride on Mother's Day 2020 and what happened next remains a mystery. Her bicycle was found down a steep ravine off Chaffee County Road 225 from Highway 50. Deputies said that the bicycle did not look like it was involved in a crash and there was not any blood at the scene. After she went missing, Barry Morphew told CBS News Colorado that he believed she was abducted before he was subsequently arrested for her murder in 2021.

A judge dismissed the case against Barry Morphew in April 2022. At the time, the 11th Judicial District Attorney, Linda Stanley, filed the motion to "dismiss without prejudice" which means that prosecutors could file charges against Barry Morphew at a later date.

The attorney for Barry Morphew released a statement on behalf of his family following the discovery of his wife's remains, that read in part, "From what we know, Barry is as innocent as he was from Day 1. DA Stanley and law enforcement got it wrong. We hope the authorities will quickly admit their wrongful persecution of Barry, an innocent man, to treat the Morphews like the victims they are, and charge the person(s) responsible for Suzanne's killing."

No arrests have been made since her remains have been located. The public is asked to continue to report any information about this case by calling (719) 312-7530.

According to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, the report from the Chaffee County Medical Examiner is expected to be released next week.
I'm anxious to learn the results.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,017
Messages
242,670
Members
974
Latest member
elimortonslywir
Back
Top Bottom