Who is the LONG ISLAND SERIAL KILLER? *ARREST JULY 2023*

long island.jpg


Who is the Long Island serial killer? This is a general discussion thread about this terrifying case.


MEMBER'S ONLY DISCUSSION/DOCUMENTS:
https://www.crimewatchers.net/threa...other-sensitive-information.3498/#post-226869
 
Last edited:
I didn't go into depth but googled their marriage date and the first things I was getting were the recent statement by Macedonia, her attorney so I kept looking and found that CNN and one or two others before this recent stuff said they were married in April of '96. Now don't get me wrong, I didn't go read them but they at least weren't from yesterday or recently from Macedonia. I knew she was pregnant the same year as the Vergata claim and so even though I didn't know the marriage date or year, I recall they got married and had V or somewhat there abouts give or take a year s to marriage and having baby. First I knew for sure they were not married throughout her pregnancy. We know V's age but not month as I recall it.

I did know Vergata was around Valentine's Day in the year she was pregnant. I don't know that we've ever known V's birth month?

Anyhow, '96 fits it all but I do have to say when you said '93 you are more up on all of the years and victims and keeping such straight then I am and it sounded familiar too.

So another thing to think on is that CB had divorced once and was in the "family home" with another woman before Asa and HER hair was also found on a victim now... Not saying that's not possible at all but a bit odd. I mean his hair isn't found nearly as much as three different females, one in a totally different year and time frame added up are found on the victims... I'ts a subject for another day but it is strange to me. Not that such could not happen but that more of his too weren't there than theirs... Were they all long haired? None cleaned? All visited the torture basement chamber? I mean he isn't short haired, he has that big front wave, etc...

I just find it peculiar since he was the one with the most contact from getting them, taking them home, torturing them, doing whatever to them and then their bodies and then transporting and disposing of them... Victoria and Asa were one thing as to hairs but now another female some years before. If no one cleaned then why haven't his mother's hairs been found on them?

It's weird to me. Maybe I will go somewhat into it now although I should be in bed as always. It isn't that it is weird their hairs may have been found but it when less of his by far were and three different hairs found of the little we know of for such evidence were more than his and ONE is now not even a member of the family household and was before Asa... Could he have been certain he cleaned all of himself or thought he did per his found plan with notes and guidelines of what to do or not do and the intentionally placed a hair from a female where he knew it would stick for good, etc... ? Not necessarily to frame them but to now have three different people and profiles, etc. LE might find when they found them...? He also coudln't know with some it would take forever for LE to find or that they wouldn' that's been found immediately...

I dotn't even have fully formed thoughts and haven't had time to really think on it but I find this odd.... Again it wouldn't be so odd if his hair was found more and even a ton of different hairs or several from wife, daughter, roommate over various years but again less of his and so on...

Way past where I need to be in bed and not thinking at best but something is wrong there especially with another woman's hair from before Asa on a victim...
it sure is strange but what he put in documents and what he actually did could be two different things and he was not so particular in keeping his victims just in the basement but upstairs in the main part of the house too as we saw with the witness account of Karen being all over the house. And that was with Asa there too. I bet he probably had the victims all over the house before he killed them as the family were not ever around according to LE, so he had the whole house to himself on most of these occasions, except for Vergata though, it seems.
 
Last edited:
No you said "you" answering me so I thought that you were talking to me. I said the second "who" in error but you knew what I meant by your answer.

I cannot see how she is being defamed if she posted this s**t. I think it would be classed as fair comment.

Gbear says she possibly liked some of the stuff or made comments or such perhaps but still it is disgusting. I believe he had this type of art at the house or in books that she, her mother and brother have become insensitived too, possibly through familiarity with such.

Sorry, I have a tendency to use the word "You" to mean anyone. I wasn't saying you specifically.
 
They were talking about Buster Murdaugh's defamation case. They said that all of his friends would be subpoenaed and have to make statements before Buster's statement would be taken. So if Buster's story doesn't match the things his friends tell about him, then he could be in hot water.

If Victoria Heuermann decided to sue for defamation, she'd have to go through the same thing. I'm sure that's something she'd avoid like the plague.
 
it sure is strange but what he put in documents and what he actually did could be two different things and he was not so particular in keeping his victims just in the basement but upstairs in the main part of the house too as we saw with the witness account of Karen being all over the house. And that was with Asa there too. I bet he probably had the victims all over the house before he killed them as the family were not ever around according to LE, so he had the whole house to himself on most of these occasions, except for Vergata though, it seems.
That's a good point about Vergata being all over the home, it still to me doesn't explain more of a lack of his hairs but the hairs of three different females though. Also his document talked of keeping the noise down and various things to not get caught or noticed and it makes me think he maybe had a close call and maybe Karen almost getting away or getting outside was one of those close calls. He talks of washing the victims cavities and various ways of cleaning evidence or keeping evidence down like with the "sheets". Not to get too graphic, but I wonder if there was a water source in the basement, meaning could he hook up a hose... If laundry was in the basement, he could...

If you get a chance, could you take a look IF not a lot of trouble of what the last date of any revision or saving of that document was? Was it after Vergata...? And did they mention any origin date, etc.?

So he is the one spending all the time on them and with them and cleaning them if the women are all innocent but still their hairs end up on various victims and fewer of his. Just ODD to me. I never really thought of this like this before last night... Do we know where the hairs were found in all cases, meaning on tape, on burlap, that they remained and existed and only a few...

The talk of washing cavities would seem to indicate he did or at least intended to per the document have sex with them, well rape them because that's not sex.

It's also a good point of yours that what he intended to do or planned to do may have ended up being different at times and the document again does seem to be a warning of past failures. Get some sleep, more play time, keep the noise down and so on, not sure I am recalling it all correctly but on that order.

You know I don't know WTH a defense attorney is going to do for CB. They went about this as far as we can tell, totally carefully and dotted the I/s and crossed the T/s. The evidence is voluminous and that's without us knowing all and we sure don't know all as some may think. Not by a long shot.

There's a few lately where I see no defense avenues. Madeline Soto is another. He is nailed every which way from Friday. At least in the SA related charges.

Yet they will likely continue all the way to trial, not sure why and just keep them as long as they can in county is all they can do imo and delay, delay, delay. Yet to be seen if they do that but I'd guess they will.

I guess they could try to turn it on V or Asa etc., his own family members but he was the one getting the burner phones and there's all that evidence...

I will guarantee this master planning document and graphic images don't tell us even all of what they found or the import, my bet anyhow... I honestly believe investigations re him and his victims may go on well past his lifetime and ours... I don't buy for a minute he quit in the years in between and since... He comes across as having way too much of a thirst for it to keep it in tamer words.

So if I have it right he is married to the first wife, they divorce and not long after we thought he was with Asa no? But in the meantime was living with another woman. Are we clear this was a gf type thing and not a sister or his mother? Not sure on that, seemed so. Then either simultaneously or shortly thereafter he had Asa pregnant and was living with Asa. First wife already knew of his penchant for prostitutes and had been through such... Asa knew too and "swung" with him.

You know I wish they'd verify or not the Vergata story because some of what we surmise is based off that being true and it may not be. We still don't know.

That's enough thoughts for my brain on another lack of much sleep night and another work day being faced. Lol.
 
They were talking about Buster Murdaugh's defamation case. They said that all of his friends would be subpoenaed and have to make statements before Buster's statement would be taken. So if Buster's story doesn't match the things his friends tell about him, then he could be in hot water.

If Victoria Heuermann decided to sue for defamation, she'd have to go through the same thing. I'm sure that's something she'd avoid like the plague.
You'd think wouldn't ya? Yet Buster went ahead. Gather he shopped around for awhile for a lawyer that would take it, probably because most were advising him it wouldn't be wise and proving the case wouldn't necessarily result in a big pay day for the atty or him or be easy. Not sure Victoria would be any brighter but then maybe its not smarts, it's that Buster just doesn't care and is going to make this show or at least start it. He will be deposed himself when it is a civil case and he should think twice.

Young and dumb raised by parents that didn't know sh*t both of them. Very different cases against their fathers, and different crimes.

I wonder what Victoria's friends have said about her, assuming LE has looked into all that, perhaps they haven't at this point. Yet. Hard to say.
 
They were talking about Buster Murdaugh's defamation case. They said that all of his friends would be subpoenaed and have to make statements before Buster's statement would be taken. So if Buster's story doesn't match the things his friends tell about him, then he could be in hot water.

If Victoria Heuermann decided to sue for defamation, she'd have to go through the same thing. I'm sure that's something she'd avoid like the plague.
Discovery would be eye opening, that's for sure.
 
That's a good point about Vergata being all over the home, it still to me doesn't explain more of a lack of his hairs but the hairs of three different females though. Also his document talked of keeping the noise down and various things to not get caught or noticed and it makes me think he maybe had a close call and maybe Karen almost getting away or getting outside was one of those close calls. He talks of washing the victims cavities and various ways of cleaning evidence or keeping evidence down like with the "sheets". Not to get too graphic, but I wonder if there was a water source in the basement, meaning could he hook up a hose... If laundry was in the basement, he could...

If you get a chance, could you take a look IF not a lot of trouble of what the last date of any revision or saving of that document was? Was it after Vergata...? And did they mention any origin date, etc.?

So he is the one spending all the time on them and with them and cleaning them if the women are all innocent but still their hairs end up on various victims and fewer of his. Just ODD to me. I never really thought of this like this before last night... Do we know where the hairs were found in all cases, meaning on tape, on burlap, that they remained and existed and only a few...

The talk of washing cavities would seem to indicate he did or at least intended to per the document have sex with them, well rape them because that's not sex.

It's also a good point of yours that what he intended to do or planned to do may have ended up being different at times and the document again does seem to be a warning of past failures. Get some sleep, more play time, keep the noise down and so on, not sure I am recalling it all correctly but on that order.

You know I don't know WTH a defense attorney is going to do for CB. They went about this as far as we can tell, totally carefully and dotted the I/s and crossed the T/s. The evidence is voluminous and that's without us knowing all and we sure don't know all as some may think. Not by a long shot.

There's a few lately where I see no defense avenues. Madeline Soto is another. He is nailed every which way from Friday. At least in the SA related charges.

Yet they will likely continue all the way to trial, not sure why and just keep them as long as they can in county is all they can do imo and delay, delay, delay. Yet to be seen if they do that but I'd guess they will.

I guess they could try to turn it on V or Asa etc., his own family members but he was the one getting the burner phones and there's all that evidence...

I will guarantee this master planning document and graphic images don't tell us even all of what they found or the import, my bet anyhow... I honestly believe investigations re him and his victims may go on well past his lifetime and ours... I don't buy for a minute he quit in the years in between and since... He comes across as having way too much of a thirst for it to keep it in tamer words.

So if I have it right he is married to the first wife, they divorce and not long after we thought he was with Asa no? But in the meantime was living with another woman. Are we clear this was a gf type thing and not a sister or his mother? Not sure on that, seemed so. Then either simultaneously or shortly thereafter he had Asa pregnant and was living with Asa. First wife already knew of his penchant for prostitutes and had been through such... Asa knew too and "swung" with him.

You know I wish they'd verify or not the Vergata story because some of what we surmise is based off that being true and it may not be. We still don't know.

That's enough thoughts for my brain on another lack of much sleep night and another work day being faced. Lol.
Regarding the document, I have a feeling it was dated 2000 but will check. It doesn't seem to me that he was doing everything in this document anyway, otherwise he would not have been caught - eg he was careless regarding sightings of his vehicle, kept it for years, was caught by his burner phones, used some of the victim's phones to call their friends and relatives and left hairs on the victims.

This article discusses the document and gives some details that answers your questions.


From the link-

Prosecutors say the document, which Mr. Heuermann created in 2000 and modified through 2002, was on a computer hard drive that investigators seized from his basement during an extensive search after his arrest last summer.​
The manual, assembled with an architect’s precision, suggests that Mr. Heuermann engaged in sadistic sexual acts with his victims before and after death.​
It arms prosecutors with a strong argument that Mr. Heuermann maintained a double life, waiting for his wife and their children to leave on vacation, and then possibly detaining, torturing and killing his victims in the basement of the family home in Massapequa Park, a middle-class neighborhood dense with well-kept houses.​
“This document is a killer. It’s better than a written or even videotaped confession because with those, any good lawyer on cross-examination can create issues of doubt,” said William Keahon, a Long Island defense lawyer and former chief of the homicide division in the Suffolk County district attorney’s office.​

“But how do you cross-examine a document he created himself on his computer?” he said.​
Michael Brown, Mr. Heuermann’s normally unflappable defense lawyer, has consistently found ways to parry a steady stream of damning details

Defense Strategy in Gilgo Murder Case: Blame a Corrupt Police Chief since his client’s arrest. But the news of the manual, released just before his client was indicted, left him scrambling for answers to reporters’ questions about a document in which his client calls the search for a victim a “hunt” and engaging with their bodies “play time.”​
In a phone interview, Mr. Brown questioned the document’s authorship and whether prosecutors might have taken it out of context, but said he needed more time to review it.​
Mr. Brown did call the two new charges, and the manual’s notes on mutilation and dismemberment, “inconsistent with the initial theory” put forth by prosecutors regarding the Gilgo Four. Unlike Ms. Taylor and Ms. Costilla, those four victims were all killed within several years of their discovery in 2010 and dumped close together, their bodies intact."​
 
Last edited:
On the document I have a feeling it was dated 2000 but will check. It doesn't seem to me that he was doing everything in this document anyway otherwise he would not have been caught - eg he was careless regarding sightings of his vehicle, kept it for years, was caught by his burner phones, used some of the victim's phones to call their friends and relatives and left hairs on the victims.

This article discusses the document and gives some details that answers your questions.


From the link-

Prosecutors say the document, which Mr. Heuermann created in 2000 and modified through 2002, was on a computer hard drive that investigators seized from his basement during an extensive search after his arrest last summer.​
The manual, assembled with an architect’s precision, suggests that Mr. Heuermann engaged in sadistic sexual acts with his victims before and after death.​
It arms prosecutors with a strong argument that Mr. Heuermann maintained a double life, waiting for his wife and their children to leave on vacation, and then possibly detaining, torturing and killing his victims in the basement of the family home in Massapequa Park, a middle-class neighborhood dense with well-kept houses.​
“This document is a killer. It’s better than a written or even videotaped confession because with those, any good lawyer on cross-examination can create issues of doubt,” said William Keahon, a Long Island defense lawyer and former chief of the homicide division in the Suffolk County district attorney’s office.​
[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--color-content-secondary,#363636)]
“But how do you cross-examine a document he created himself on his computer?” he said.​
Michael Brown, Mr. Heuermann’s normally unflappable defense lawyer, has consistently found ways to [COLOR=var(--color-signal-editorial,#326891)]parry a steady stream of damning details

Defense Strategy in Gilgo Murder Case: Blame a Corrupt Police Chief since his client’s arrest. But the news of the manual, released just before his client was indicted, left him scrambling for answers to reporters’ questions about a document in which his client calls the search for a victim a “hunt” and engaging with their bodies “play time.”​
In a phone interview, Mr. Brown questioned the document’s authorship and whether prosecutors might have taken it out of context, but said he needed more time to review it.​
Mr. Brown did call the two new charges, and the manual’s notes on mutilation and dismemberment, “inconsistent with the initial theory” put forth by prosecutors regarding the Gilgo Four. Unlike Ms. Taylor and Ms. Costilla, those four victims were all killed within several years of their discovery in 2010 and dumped close together, their bodies intact."​
The document may have been created due to screw ups and close calls, perhaps after the 90s victims but before the 2000s victims. I am the first to admit I mix up the names, the wheres, the way the body was found (whether parts or whole), who was who as to that and the years. I know a little about each and remember it and more on some but keeping all those other details straight I fail at.
I even tend to forget any of the murders were in the 2000s and I think because for so many years, many LE current and retired, etc. or talking heads tended to think there were two murderers and the murders years apart were not connected to the others. The 90s ones stick as to one set happened then but the 2000s I tend to forget, NOT that they happened but that such were in those years.

Did he quit in between because he did have some close call or one helluva fight by a victim or one that even got away he caught again and then wanting to get going again wrote this planning document? Or was he killing somewhere else and in a different manner thinking that would keep him safer as they would not get connected, like in SC for example or Vegas and so on or down by mom's...

THANK YOU for finding that info. So he didn't have it in the 90s and keep revising it it would seem. Unless this wasn't his first or only one ever.
 
They were talking about Buster Murdaugh's defamation case. They said that all of his friends would be subpoenaed and have to make statements before Buster's statement would be taken. So if Buster's story doesn't match the things his friends tell about him, then he could be in hot water.

If Victoria Heuermann decided to sue for defamation, she'd have to go through the same thing. I'm sure that's something she'd avoid like the plague.
Re BM and friends, I am sure they already have their stories straight - they have had plenty of time for sure. I thought we heard a long while ago that they had suspects in custody anyway - will have to check.

Same with VH IMO. Her, her mother and their lawyers will deny anything to do with it probably and they have had plenty of time to get backstories straight. Let her sue.
 
The document may have been created due to screw ups and close calls, perhaps after the 90s victims but before the 2000s victims. I am the first to admit I mix up the names, the wheres, the way the body was found (whether parts or whole), who was who as to that and the years. I know a little about each and remember it and more on some but keeping all those other details straight I fail at.
I even tend to forget any of the murders were in the 2000s and I think because for so many years, many LE current and retired, etc. or talking heads tended to think there were two murderers and the murders years apart were not connected to the others. The 90s ones stick as to one set happened then but the 2000s I tend to forget, NOT that they happened but that such were in those years.

Did he quit in between because he did have some close call or one helluva fight by a victim or one that even got away he caught again and then wanting to get going again wrote this planning document? Or was he killing somewhere else and in a different manner thinking that would keep him safer as they would not get connected, like in SC for example or Vegas and so on or down by mom's...

THANK YOU for finding that info. So he didn't have it in the 90s and keep revising it it would seem. Unless this wasn't his first or only one ever.
PC's were in their infancy in the early 90s and quite rare. I remember myself and my boss sharing a desktop PC for several years at work and I never had one at home till early 2000's IIRC. Probably similar in the US ?
 
PC's were in their infancy in the early 90s and quite rare. I remember myself and my boss sharing a desktop PC for several years at work and I never had one at home till early 2000's IIRC. Probably similar in the US ?
I went to tech school in I believe '87 or '88 and there was a class on PCs and they were new to me and Greek to me. I recall seeing something about a computer in an accounting class in a book in high school and it showed like four things, input, ________, processing (I think and then output lol on a chart. Sounded again Greek and like huh, how can some machine thnk? The class in tech we actually used them some but the teacher although very nice and knew the PC inside and out, was not someone that could teach imo and convey very well, still Greek to me but learned them somewhat and in that day it was all DOS, they weren't these easy to use click a mouse or use a touch pad interactive with pictures experience lol. Of COURSE anyone today can hope on one and use with ease just as a childl can with one or a phone, tablet, etc. We had to know commands and type them correctly and so on and there was no internet.

I had none at home.

I then took a job in '89 at a law firm and took a step backwards. Even though I knew how to use an IBM PC they had ancient (imo at that time lol) machines called Wang computers or word processor or somewhat. Dinosaurs imo but they were probably more up to date than almost any business in my small city as they HAD computers. They were used for word processing almost solely and for long legal documents or any legal document. The front or reception area of the office was still correcting typewriters and those employees mainly did short letters and such. Both were older than I well all in the office were and comfortable with typewriters only. A woman closer to my age (I was in my mid 20s, she may be 30) taught me the WANG and we worked together and were the only two that used them. I FELT I had stepped backwards. I had learned the PC and was up to date and here I am on behemoths called Wangs.

The attorneys in the office consisted of five and two were the founding partners and older, one was a woman maybe 40 if that, another a man maybe 40s and the last one fhe son of one of the founding partners and the youngest. HE was bent on keeping the office up to date and on getting PCs but had to fight the aged ones both on cost and being set in their ways, seeing no need and probably a fear of such. The older office employees wanted no part of such either.

I was there two years and he won out not too long in and not only did us two with the Wangs get PCs but every employee in the front office did as well. And the bookkeeper, etc.

Oh MY. Who they bought them from was to come with someone who trained us all in. What a joke. He came in and all us women were sitting in a room with him while he tried to show us what to do and how to work them and he was worthless. Someone would ask him a question and he had no idea. Since I learned them in school/tech, I knew and I found myself telling him how to do things and then showing the others how. They did not have him back and from then out I got all in the office adjusted and going front and back to troubles and questions until all new how to use them. I was the youngest and had no seniority and the older ones were threatened at first but I'm not a competitive type and this won me out with all of them eventually and I was solid and good friend with them all. I also taught the one who taught me the Wang. I then went on to create every legal form known to mankind for the office where one could automatically fill them for each case. I self taught with every knew program, etc. I'd say we were ahead of many as to being computerized.

I loved the job, loved the people, job was high stress with legal deadlines but I loved it. Absolutely a great first office job to start at because I learned what absolutely top notch ethical attorneys were like and I also learned and saw bad attorneys our firm dealt with.

The problem is one could hardly live on the wages. Very unfair and very out of touch. The same young attorney fought for 401s, higher wages, etc. but got nowhere with this stuff with the aged partners.

I had two kids and was divorced. I was young and wanted out of our small area and still to find a life and career. I took a job in a bigger city an hour away that offered me a LOT more money and bonuses with the intent of moving there. The place I was at was sad to see me go but coudln't match the wages and gave me a glowing letter of recommendation. Long story short, I never did move and the commute to that job for two years especially in the winter and with two kids I was an hour away from who were in day care was impossible, I couldn't do it and quit. THAT job had IBM PCs when I went in but did not have the legal forms and I also there started making them all for their office as well as doing case files and word processing. Two years there. Computerized already. BUT also still had typewriters. And none were greater on the PCs except knowing how to "type" on them basically. This was '91 to '93.

I then took a job with back in my home town/city and a cut in pay yet again. Our town was notoriously low pay in M-F office jobs, factory workers made more. I would stay at this job 20 years and much of it was because they didn't pay great but worked with me as to if I had to run pick up a sick kid, they forget a backpack, etc. This job was insurance related, an independent small firm. Again typewriters but they'd been kind of going through the same boat. The sole owner, older, was an Apple/Mac fan and wanted all computerized but understood none of it. He had bought one no one knew how to run including himself. Then there was an IBM just sitting there as well. No one ran any of them, so again I computerized the office and the Mac eventually went even though he wanted it all Mac, no way. I started working that job doing documents and reports on a typewriter and felt I'd stepped backwards yet again since schooling.

No internet but it was at this job internet came about. I had never had a computer at home either up til some time in this job when I bought a used one from one of the insurance guys in the office.

I could sidetrack further on all of these jobs and about computers and such too but point is yes every job from 89 I believe it was to 93, started at the last one in '93 and was there to 2013 had computers or got them, but NO internet.

I bought my home in 1994 and no computer. My oldest daughter graduated in 2000 and we'd had a computer for awhile by then and internet, not sure exactly when, so somewhere between '94 and 2000 we'd already had a computer for some years and I got her a cell phone at 16 and had had one myself for a bit and the computer came before cell phones for me.

And I'd say I lived in a very old non progressive kind of area for the most part, lol.

So consider that CB is in NYC, Manhattan no less and NYC is a world city basically and is going to be ahead of my area by far on services, tech and more and he was an architect. Yeah he'd have had computers during the '90s killings most likely, remember he was using Craig's List, I assume you know what that is or is it not know in the UK? People still use it but it's not AS much of a thing as it was then. And of course it wasn't just for escorts and such but selling of cars or services or anything. I've used it to buy and sell, most have.

If I thought harder, I could pinpoint the years, but I had a cell phone, a computer and internet (after the computer) sometime between '94 and 2000 and definitely did not get any of them in '94 or 2000 so it can be narrowed down to '95 to '99 when all of them came.... For ME. My jobs had them before that but this is when it all started coming about for most in the US, in my area and in school. I think my class in school was the first year they had a PC class, in tech school. But we'd be behind I'm sure somewhere like NYC. And internet was dial up and archaic and terrible and slow for years.

CB is my and emu's approximate age. @Cousin Dupree could weigh in on this, because even though not from NYC he is from NY as to when all came about in his jobs and when he got one, etc.

I'd say CB latched right on to computers and cell phones probably in the '90s, look at him with all the hard drives and burner phones. NYC would be ahead on tech imo and infrastructure even for it. Cell towers, internet faster than dial up, etc. I mean think about this, it houses the stock exchange, they may have been actually number one almost with all...

And we know computers were around even before I had the class in '88 or '89, but they were huge machines like Stephen Cray came up with a huge super computer and went on to, well that's another sidetrack of a story. I knew of computers in my last year or two of high school but only as an odd concept and that was at the start of the '80s. PCs came after that by late '80s when I had it in tech school and they had them.

I'd hazard a guess that CB and Asa had a computer or more than one since the time they met and he definitely had them at the office. He used Craig's list to find most women. Shannon Gilbert advertised on Craig's List did she not? That's internet and that's computer.

I forget the actual question or point but CB could have had a document or two or plan even prior to 2000, this could even be retyped. Back then when you changed computers or updated even if you had backed up and such programs changed so fast it was not easy to transfer everything and you SURE are not going to have some techie transfer a murder document for you in my opinion. He saved every hard drive he ever had imo because things that matter to them are on them. They're going to find and probably have, a wealth of sh*t. We know of much already. They don't detail every torture pic or video but they refer to such and more.

Anyhow, if that helps narrow when sh*t came about in the US, there ya go and I'd say we'd be behind metropolitan or big cities. I had a computer at home albeit a beast, and I had internet, some years before 2000. If I really thought about it I could narrow down the year to exact and the year I put on internet, etc... I'm going to say pre '98 with both and so I've now narrowed to between '95 and '98 with computer and internet. I perhaps put internet on the moment I bought the used computer...
 
Very common back then at home to share one. Lots of homes still share one.
My office transitioned in probably early 2000s to working out of our respective homes. By then out of like eight of us or so, only my boss and I remained shortly thereafter. All the office equipment came to my home. Computer, copy machine, printers, you name it, office supplies. I was left with the one boss who was absolutely NON TECH so he'd travel over with work, no idea how to email dictation, etc. Still had the old tower and desktop computer although we always stayed somewhat up to date, new one every few years or so. And I couldn't fathom getting rid of a desktop ever.

ABout the time I married my husband and we were living in his home and my office was then there, we had been at mine the previous years, I wanted a laptop because working from home, and internet had advanced some although we were far from having wifi there, I wanted to be able to sit in the kitchen at the counter if I wanted and work there if I didn't feel like being in the office there. I STILL kept the "old" tower and desktop. I to THIS day prefer the regular keyboard and I connect one to my lap tops wirelessly not physically but can use a laptop one, at first that was hard. I am long past keeping any desktop PC model. I couldn't imagine doing that at first.

I don't think a ton of people still have desktops myself. My MOM doesn't even. By the time we moved to our property, I had even ditched any for my job and we were purely laptop, not that my boss used such but that's all I did the bookkeeping and everything on. I couldn't imagine not having one at first but as I used a laptop, the other went by the wayside. I still like to add a bigger monitor or throw it to the TV screen, etc. and prefer a full sized keyboard but that's easy too, but I can pack up the computer with no extra keyboard and travel with it.

Are you talking of many families still sharing a desktop or a laptop, notebook, etc.? Not that it matters, just curious. Almost no one I know still has a desktop.
 
I went to tech school in I believe '87 or '88 and there was a class on PCs and they were new to me and Greek to me. I recall seeing something about a computer in an accounting class in a book in high school and it showed like four things, input, ________, processing (I think and then output lol on a chart. Sounded again Greek and like huh, how can some machine thnk? The class in tech we actually used them some but the teacher although very nice and knew the PC inside and out, was not someone that could teach imo and convey very well, still Greek to me but learned them somewhat and in that day it was all DOS, they weren't these easy to use click a mouse or use a touch pad interactive with pictures experience lol. Of COURSE anyone today can hope on one and use with ease just as a childl can with one or a phone, tablet, etc. We had to know commands and type them correctly and so on and there was no internet.

I had none at home.

I then took a job in '89 at a law firm and took a step backwards. Even though I knew how to use an IBM PC they had ancient (imo at that time lol) machines called Wang computers or word processor or somewhat. Dinosaurs imo but they were probably more up to date than almost any business in my small city as they HAD computers. They were used for word processing almost solely and for long legal documents or any legal document. The front or reception area of the office was still correcting typewriters and those employees mainly did short letters and such. Both were older than I well all in the office were and comfortable with typewriters only. A woman closer to my age (I was in my mid 20s, she may be 30) taught me the WANG and we worked together and were the only two that used them. I FELT I had stepped backwards. I had learned the PC and was up to date and here I am on behemoths called Wangs.

The attorneys in the office consisted of five and two were the founding partners and older, one was a woman maybe 40 if that, another a man maybe 40s and the last one fhe son of one of the founding partners and the youngest. HE was bent on keeping the office up to date and on getting PCs but had to fight the aged ones both on cost and being set in their ways, seeing no need and probably a fear of such. The older office employees wanted no part of such either.

I was there two years and he won out not too long in and not only did us two with the Wangs get PCs but every employee in the front office did as well. And the bookkeeper, etc.

Oh MY. Who they bought them from was to come with someone who trained us all in. What a joke. He came in and all us women were sitting in a room with him while he tried to show us what to do and how to work them and he was worthless. Someone would ask him a question and he had no idea. Since I learned them in school/tech, I knew and I found myself telling him how to do things and then showing the others how. They did not have him back and from then out I got all in the office adjusted and going front and back to troubles and questions until all new how to use them. I was the youngest and had no seniority and the older ones were threatened at first but I'm not a competitive type and this won me out with all of them eventually and I was solid and good friend with them all. I also taught the one who taught me the Wang. I then went on to create every legal form known to mankind for the office where one could automatically fill them for each case. I self taught with every knew program, etc. I'd say we were ahead of many as to being computerized.

I loved the job, loved the people, job was high stress with legal deadlines but I loved it. Absolutely a great first office job to start at because I learned what absolutely top notch ethical attorneys were like and I also learned and saw bad attorneys our firm dealt with.

The problem is one could hardly live on the wages. Very unfair and very out of touch. The same young attorney fought for 401s, higher wages, etc. but got nowhere with this stuff with the aged partners.

I had two kids and was divorced. I was young and wanted out of our small area and still to find a life and career. I took a job in a bigger city an hour away that offered me a LOT more money and bonuses with the intent of moving there. The place I was at was sad to see me go but coudln't match the wages and gave me a glowing letter of recommendation. Long story short, I never did move and the commute to that job for two years especially in the winter and with two kids I was an hour away from who were in day care was impossible, I couldn't do it and quit. THAT job had IBM PCs when I went in but did not have the legal forms and I also there started making them all for their office as well as doing case files and word processing. Two years there. Computerized already. BUT also still had typewriters. And none were greater on the PCs except knowing how to "type" on them basically. This was '91 to '93.

I then took a job with back in my home town/city and a cut in pay yet again. Our town was notoriously low pay in M-F office jobs, factory workers made more. I would stay at this job 20 years and much of it was because they didn't pay great but worked with me as to if I had to run pick up a sick kid, they forget a backpack, etc. This job was insurance related, an independent small firm. Again typewriters but they'd been kind of going through the same boat. The sole owner, older, was an Apple/Mac fan and wanted all computerized but understood none of it. He had bought one no one knew how to run including himself. Then there was an IBM just sitting there as well. No one ran any of them, so again I computerized the office and the Mac eventually went even though he wanted it all Mac, no way. I started working that job doing documents and reports on a typewriter and felt I'd stepped backwards yet again since schooling.

No internet but it was at this job internet came about. I had never had a computer at home either up til some time in this job when I bought a used one from one of the insurance guys in the office.

I could sidetrack further on all of these jobs and about computers and such too but point is yes every job from 89 I believe it was to 93, started at the last one in '93 and was there to 2013 had computers or got them, but NO internet.

I bought my home in 1994 and no computer. My oldest daughter graduated in 2000 and we'd had a computer for awhile by then and internet, not sure exactly when, so somewhere between '94 and 2000 we'd already had a computer for some years and I got her a cell phone at 16 and had had one myself for a bit and the computer came before cell phones for me.

And I'd say I lived in a very old non progressive kind of area for the most part, lol.

So consider that CB is in NYC, Manhattan no less and NYC is a world city basically and is going to be ahead of my area by far on services, tech and more and he was an architect. Yeah he'd have had computers during the '90s killings most likely, remember he was using Craig's List, I assume you know what that is or is it not know in the UK? People still use it but it's not AS much of a thing as it was then. And of course it wasn't just for escorts and such but selling of cars or services or anything. I've used it to buy and sell, most have.

If I thought harder, I could pinpoint the years, but I had a cell phone, a computer and internet (after the computer) sometime between '94 and 2000 and definitely did not get any of them in '94 or 2000 so it can be narrowed down to '95 to '99 when all of them came.... For ME. My jobs had them before that but this is when it all started coming about for most in the US, in my area and in school. I think my class in school was the first year they had a PC class, in tech school. But we'd be behind I'm sure somewhere like NYC. And internet was dial up and archaic and terrible and slow for years.

CB is my and emu's approximate age. @Cousin Dupree could weigh in on this, because even though not from NYC he is from NY as to when all came about in his jobs and when he got one, etc.

I'd say CB latched right on to computers and cell phones probably in the '90s, look at him with all the hard drives and burner phones. NYC would be ahead on tech imo and infrastructure even for it. Cell towers, internet faster than dial up, etc. I mean think about this, it houses the stock exchange, they may have been actually number one almost with all...

And we know computers were around even before I had the class in '88 or '89, but they were huge machines like Stephen Cray came up with a huge super computer and went on to, well that's another sidetrack of a story. I knew of computers in my last year or two of high school but only as an odd concept and that was at the start of the '80s. PCs came after that by late '80s when I had it in tech school and they had them.

I'd hazard a guess that CB and Asa had a computer or more than one since the time they met and he definitely had them at the office. He used Craig's list to find most women. Shannon Gilbert advertised on Craig's List did she not? That's internet and that's computer.

I forget the actual question or point but CB could have had a document or two or plan even prior to 2000, this could even be retyped. Back then when you changed computers or updated even if you had backed up and such programs changed so fast it was not easy to transfer everything and you SURE are not going to have some techie transfer a murder document for you in my opinion. He saved every hard drive he ever had imo because things that matter to them are on them. They're going to find and probably have, a wealth of sh*t. We know of much already. They don't detail every torture pic or video but they refer to such and more.

Anyhow, if that helps narrow when sh*t came about in the US, there ya go and I'd say we'd be behind metropolitan or big cities. I had a computer at home albeit a beast, and I had internet, some years before 2000. If I really thought about it I could narrow down the year to exact and the year I put on internet, etc... I'm going to say pre '98 with both and so I've now narrowed to between '95 and '98 with computer and internet. I perhaps put internet on the moment I bought the used computer...

It was mid-nineties while I was working at the hospital when I got my first computer. It was a Mac running on a phone connection. 14.5 speed. It took a half hour for the CNN site to load.

At work, the pharmacists used the same computer system and the ones in the main area were next to each other for four pharmacists to sit at and enter orders.

O/T A friend who was working there at the time, after I left, said one of the midnight pharmacists was fired for looking up child porn on computers in another room.
 
It was mid-nineties while I was working at the hospital when I got my first computer. It was a Mac running on a phone connection. 14.5 speed. It took a half hour for the CNN site to load.

At work, the pharmacists used the same computer system and the ones in the main area were next to each other for four pharmacists to sit at and enter orders.

O/T A friend who was working there at the time, after I left, said one of the midnight pharmacists was fired for looking up child porn on computers in another room.
Yeah I would say mid nineties is where dial up internet for us came in, it was slow and crashed a lot. I recall it being new to me and playing Bingo and you couldn't win ever because by the time the slow speed gave you a number someone else had already won. That was at home.

And 1/2 an hour for something like CNN to load I can believe and then probably wasn't perfect.

The O/T is actually on topic because CB was using computers for such things, child porn, torture porn and more. It's actually scary and concerning to hear this and I think when internet got going porn was probably one of the biggest parts of it going on hearing things nowadays and you are talking child porn here and that early on, there it was for these evil creeps.

I'd dare say your pharmacy stuff and use of computers and internet was probably ahead of us a bit and some businesses would have been quicker to update or connect. When was your first home computer, do you recall?
 
Yeah I would say mid nineties is where dial up internet for us came in, it was slow and crashed a lot. I recall it being new to me and playing Bingo and you couldn't win ever because by the time the slow speed gave you a number someone else had already won. That was at home.

And 1/2 an hour for something like CNN to load I can believe and then probably wasn't perfect.

The O/T is actually on topic because CB was using computers for such things, child porn, torture porn and more. It's actually scary and concerning to hear this and I think when internet got going porn was probably one of the biggest parts of it going on hearing things nowadays and you are talking child porn here and that early on, there it was for these evil creeps.

I'd dare say your pharmacy stuff and use of computers and internet was probably ahead of us a bit and some businesses would have been quicker to update or connect. When was your first home computer, do you recall?

1995 or 1996.
 
1995 or 1996.
Yeah I think about the same here. Archaic thinking of it now and I believe I probably connected internet the same time as I got it or shortly thereafter. Archaic internet. Bought it used from a "boss', he wasn't a "boss" he said but a coworker but one of the insurance guys. His wife was an IT phenomenal expert, still probably is today. He died in his 50s :( while I worked with him.
 
My office transitioned in probably early 2000s to working out of our respective homes. By then out of like eight of us or so, only my boss and I remained shortly thereafter. All the office equipment came to my home. Computer, copy machine, printers, you name it, office supplies. I was left with the one boss who was absolutely NON TECH so he'd travel over with work, no idea how to email dictation, etc. Still had the old tower and desktop computer although we always stayed somewhat up to date, new one every few years or so. And I couldn't fathom getting rid of a desktop ever.

ABout the time I married my husband and we were living in his home and my office was then there, we had been at mine the previous years, I wanted a laptop because working from home, and internet had advanced some although we were far from having wifi there, I wanted to be able to sit in the kitchen at the counter if I wanted and work there if I didn't feel like being in the office there. I STILL kept the "old" tower and desktop. I to THIS day prefer the regular keyboard and I connect one to my lap tops wirelessly not physically but can use a laptop one, at first that was hard. I am long past keeping any desktop PC model. I couldn't imagine doing that at first.

I don't think a ton of people still have desktops myself. My MOM doesn't even. By the time we moved to our property, I had even ditched any for my job and we were purely laptop, not that my boss used such but that's all I did the bookkeeping and everything on. I couldn't imagine not having one at first but as I used a laptop, the other went by the wayside. I still like to add a bigger monitor or throw it to the TV screen, etc. and prefer a full sized keyboard but that's easy too, but I can pack up the computer with no extra keyboard and travel with it.

Are you talking of many families still sharing a desktop or a laptop, notebook, etc.? Not that it matters, just curious. Almost no one I know still has a desktop.
We still have a desktop with a tower CPU on the floor which I use, can access email and the internet and we watch TV on it. I bought it second hand from a lady who works from home and has a computer business she runs with her son. Have had it for about 5 years now and had a different one from the same lady for about 5 years before that too. We don't have a separate TV. I use my Android phone for CW and most of my email and internet use though.

For work purposes I would guess my first experience using the internet came from around '98 timeframe IIRC. Not sure when I got my first smart phone, but it was not till at least the 2000's, I am pretty sure. Prior to that from approx '97 I had a mobile phone but no internet capabilities for several years at all on my first 2 or 3 phones.
 
Last edited:
That's a good point about Vergata being all over the home, it still to me doesn't explain more of a lack of his hairs but the hairs of three different females though. Also his document talked of keeping the noise down and various things to not get caught or noticed and it makes me think he maybe had a close call and maybe Karen almost getting away or getting outside was one of those close calls. He talks of washing the victims cavities and various ways of cleaning evidence or keeping evidence down like with the "sheets". Not to get too graphic, but I wonder if there was a water source in the basement, meaning could he hook up a hose... If laundry was in the basement, he could...

If you get a chance, could you take a look IF not a lot of trouble of what the last date of any revision or saving of that document was? Was it after Vergata...? And did they mention any origin date, etc.?

So he is the one spending all the time on them and with them and cleaning them if the women are all innocent but still their hairs end up on various victims and fewer of his. Just ODD to me. I never really thought of this like this before last night... Do we know where the hairs were found in all cases, meaning on tape, on burlap, that they remained and existed and only a few...

The talk of washing cavities would seem to indicate he did or at least intended to per the document have sex with them, well rape them because that's not sex.

It's also a good point of yours that what he intended to do or planned to do may have ended up being different at times and the document again does seem to be a warning of past failures. Get some sleep, more play time, keep the noise down and so on, not sure I am recalling it all correctly but on that order.

You know I don't know WTH a defense attorney is going to do for CB. They went about this as far as we can tell, totally carefully and dotted the I/s and crossed the T/s. The evidence is voluminous and that's without us knowing all and we sure don't know all as some may think. Not by a long shot.

There's a few lately where I see no defense avenues. Madeline Soto is another. He is nailed every which way from Friday. At least in the SA related charges.

Yet they will likely continue all the way to trial, not sure why and just keep them as long as they can in county is all they can do imo and delay, delay, delay. Yet to be seen if they do that but I'd guess they will.

I guess they could try to turn it on V or Asa etc., his own family members but he was the one getting the burner phones and there's all that evidence...

I will guarantee this master planning document and graphic images don't tell us even all of what they found or the import, my bet anyhow... I honestly believe investigations re him and his victims may go on well past his lifetime and ours... I don't buy for a minute he quit in the years in between and since... He comes across as having way too much of a thirst for it to keep it in tamer words.

So if I have it right he is married to the first wife, they divorce and not long after we thought he was with Asa no? But in the meantime was living with another woman. Are we clear this was a gf type thing and not a sister or his mother? Not sure on that, seemed so. Then either simultaneously or shortly thereafter he had Asa pregnant and was living with Asa. First wife already knew of his penchant for prostitutes and had been through such... Asa knew too and "swung" with him.

You know I wish they'd verify or not the Vergata story because some of what we surmise is based off that being true and it may not be. We still don't know.

That's enough thoughts for my brain on another lack of much sleep night and another work day being faced. Lol.
Thoughts on this other female's hair that was found. Could it be a hair from Karen from when she was in the house that was found on a later victim? Did they actually say a woman who lived in the house or a woman who was just in the house? Eg a visitor or previous victim.
 
We still have a desktop with a tower CPU on the floor which I use, can access email and the internet and we watch TV on it. I bought it second hand from a lady who works from home and has a computer business she runs with her son. Have had it for about 5 years now and had a different one from the same lady for about 5 years before that too. We don't have a separate TV. I use my Android phone for CW and most of my email and internet use though.

For work purposes I would guess my first experience using the internet came from around '98 timeframe IIRC. Not sure when I got my first smart phone, but it was not till at least the 2000's, I am pretty sure. Prior to that from approx '97 I had a mobile phone but no internet capabilities for several years at all on my first 2 or 3 phones.
I had a desktop with tower into the 2000s but once the job I had worked at for 20 years, in the end being out of the home, was over (last remaining boss retired, business basically dissolved) I was used to by then having a laptop and a desktop and using the laptop the most and just quit with the desktops, I was already doing all on a laptop most of the time by then. I was very glad also to be rid of the room and cords they entailed lol.

Heck I didn't have a smart phone until WELL into the 2000s. Maybe ten years ago or so my first? And like you said the first ones were not internet capable. I went from a big and bulky first phone (compared to nowadays) to I don't recall all but had a flip phone, then one with a keypad that slid, etc. Then they actually went from what had gotten pretty small, to back to bigger and bulky when the smart phone came about lol.

I'm not sure when internet came along with or on phones...? I think the Smart phone WAS the first I was aware of such. MAYBE my one prior had internet capability, can't recall. it is around here somewhere. If it did, I never used it. I think it came along with the Smart phone didn't it? By then tablets were around too for some time and many never knew a Kindle could be used by a kid for more purposes than books so maybe they've always had that capability, phones I mean... @kdg411 might know even though she is a young pup. :) Compared to us dinosaurs. No offense intended and including self in that remark.

To get to CB, he used Craigslist and did he not even with his 90s victims? If so, he had internet and a PC, whether at work or home, unsure, and we know he used burner phones, was that true with the 90s victims as well? I believe so. If so, I think we can safely assume he had such and then wife and kids and all are said to be gamers and so on and all this tech was found. I would say they had such probably long before some of us did and again being NYC and his profession they'd likely be ahead of some of the rest of us and our areas...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,009
Messages
241,031
Members
969
Latest member
SamiraMill
Back
Top Bottom