You'd think that while they are arresting him someone would be at the house, telling her and other family members there that he was being arrested and what for. Then interview them there or ask them to come down to the PD for an interview. Especially with the number of her hairs found on the bodies.
That's EXACTLY what I assumed happened all along or that they would do simultaneously at their home as they arrested him in Manhattan and then I heard this, that no they haven't talked to her at ALL.
Why is that??? That's your CHANCE. With him as well, when first arrested and surprised.
All his searches and their arresting likely before they planned, was it because of another possible impending attack or was it because he and his wife were becoming aware they were onto him? I include her in this remark BECAUSE of the fact they didn't try to interview or interrogate her or the kids....
This came from Grizzly and I should have linked it and given the time in the video but never once have I known her to put something out that was false and if unknown she says so, this was a fact I believe. It came from something she likely named. I am so overloaded and tired but I wouldn't have shared it if not pretty certain it is the case.
Even in our "small" case (not small but huge to us as you know but not nationally known of course), it was so hard to hold in the feelings but we were constantly advised he hadn't lawyered up and other reasons to share with no one that they knew he did it so that he would keep talking to them if they requested, for one reason.
I bring this up because as we all know it is their maybe one chance to do that with HIM AND family.
And she lawyered up pretty fast and filed for divorce. I honestly thought that was likely due to their advice.
I've been on about her on here and I am not sure what my issue is with her but I just don't like something about it all. It isn't like we know much but something just doesn't sit right. I feel the same with Allen's wife in Delphi but in that one we haven't heard from her at all. And maybe that's part of it with both of them. Whether they think their husbands innocent or guilty, THEY say nothing about the poor families or victims. This one though does and has talked about her woes and damages and has went on about what she has had to suffer. She's alive though. They aren't.
I was trying to be fair but it is hard to understand. I understand it was a whammy (if it was unknown to her) but along with that would come a whammy about what these families must then feel or have dealt with all these years. She could say I don't think he did this but regardless, I can't even imagine what they are going through and I sure hope the perp is caught and slayed, but it isn't my husband. Or is. What DOES she believe? Or was she part?
www.crimewatchers.net
