Last edited by a moderator:
But it isn't a fact that the note was written after JonBenet was murdered, right?
(At this point, I think it's most productive to just try to differentiate fact from opinion.)
It isn't odd coming from Arndt, who I've seen form conclusions based on nothing but her imagination.
Indeed, it matters.Does it matter if it was before or after she was killed? Sit down and write a nine page note about abducting a kid and see how long it takes. If you make a mistake stop and start again.
She's your source.I don't know who Arndt is. Was she the police officer on scene?
Pedophiles don't write ransom notes, long ones or practice in ANY case we've ever seen to try to throw a trail off and on top of it throw shade to some group, knowing bonus amounts, etc. and so on. That's where this case falls down. Totally. Is that ALL other possible scenarios like some pedophile would have no need or even think about doing such much less practice and more. Pedophiles I think most of us would agree have one intent. That is to get the child, snatch the child, do as their mind and sick intent is and leave. Usually taking the child away, not in the HOME.Indeed, it matters.
And it wasn't a nine page note. It was 2 and !/2 pages written on legal size paper. A total of nine pages were missing/had been torn from the tablet with 3 of the 9 having been the note. The other missing pages were never found.
What's been reported in the media as a "practice note found in the house" is a page that was still in the tablet- the 10th page, if you will- and is presumed to have been the start of the ransom note.
She's your source.
She was a BPD detective called to the home primarily to monitor/wire the phone.
If the purpose was to taunt, that's a behavior I have seen before.Pedophiles don't write ransom notes, long ones or practice in ANY case we've ever seen to try to throw a trail off and on top of it throw shade to some group, knowing bonus amounts, etc. and so on.
I don't know of anyone at the scene who has or would agree with that.No ransom phone call came and even aside from Arndt there is no indication the Ramseys were waiting and desperaet for it and that hope that their daughter was alive.
It wasn't John but White who said he'd opened the wine cellar door but the room was dark and he couldn't find the light switch.The ransom note was over the top as was the garote or however it is spellled. So was John's missing her the first time.
I don't see something practiced over and over and then finally finished as some taunt in any way shape or form. Taunting with what? it isn't about guess where she is, guess who I am like some serial killer's notes to media or news. I't a a clear attempt to point away or to a "faction", knowledge of bonus and claim of a kidnapping and demand for ransom that had no basis and never occurred. It's no taunt it is to misdirect and point elsewhere. It isn't a "ha ha here's a clue try to catch me if you can". That's a taunt.If the purpose was to taunt, that's a behavior I have seen before.
I don't know of anyone at the scene who has or would agree with that.
Yeah, I know that. And so? It's a search for a missing child and so what do you do or who do you ask if you can't find the switch? This WAS important right? A child was missing.It wasn't John but White who said he'd opened the wine cellar door but the room was dark and he couldn't find the light switch.
If the purpose was to taunt, that's a behavior I have seen before.
I don't know of anyone at the scene who has or would agree with that.
I think a pedophile's motivation behind writing a note, that is- that behavior- would be to taunt.I don't see something practiced over and over and then finally finished as some taunt in any way shape or form. Taunting with what?
I'm talking of everyone else who was there besides Arndt and the Ramsey's. In other words, Arndt wasn't only referring to the Ramsey's but everyone there.Not sure what you mean with your second sentence. You mean the Ramsey's friends they called over or who are you talking of?
I don't think White was searching for JonBenet, I think he was just down there looking around for anything out of the ordinary.Yeah, I know that. And so? It's a search for a missing child and so what do you do or who do you ask if you can't find the switch? This WAS important right? A child was missing.
My opinion as well. They took their ideas from a book in the house and a movie they had watched. They were afraid that Burke would be taken away from them.The Ramsey's refused to talk to the police unless they knew what the questions would be.
Burke was completely unafraid that someone would come for him after this happened.
A Grand Jury indicted them and the DA refused to charge the Ramsey's.
She was friends with them and told people she worked with that the Ramsey's would never be charged as long as she was DA.
Despite John and Patsy saying Burke was in bed when they called the police, a third voice can be heard on the phone call to 911.
I think Burke got mad at JB and took something (probably a flashlight) and hit her head. He didn't mean to kill her, but the Ramsey's would never admit that's what happened. So they invented the whole kidnapping story. If nobody found the body they would have buried her somewhere else. Like their property down south.
I don't think White was searching for JonBenet, I think he was just down there looking around for anything out of the ordinary.
You know, I don't think Officer French was either because he'd observed the cellar door but didn't open it because he decided it wasn't an exit.
Right, but did she mean that literally? I don't think I would have taken it that way.John and White were told by Arndt to search the house from top to bottom. She did that just to give them something to do. For some reason they started at the bottom.