It sounds to me like this is always the case in this courtroom and if so, it wasn't done to do it to her in her case or to her side. My county has a newer justice center, probably 20 or so years old now and yet the courtrooms are small and not all is ideal. Jurors can see the witnesses though but you know what attendees can never see the perp's face and I dont' agree with that either.Wow! Not wanting every juror to see a witness' face is just mind blowing! This too stinks of some kind of attempted messing with this case for the prosecution. It seems they don't want jurors to assess if certain witness' are lying. I can't think of a single case that didn't have the jury able to see all the witness' full faces.
I would say it happens in every case in that county since that is the way their court room is designed. Just because we haven't heard about it doesn't mean it hasn't happened.Wow! Not wanting every juror to see a witness' face is just mind blowing! This too stinks of some kind of attempted messing with this case for the prosecution. It seems they don't want jurors to assess if certain witness' are lying. I can't think of a single case that didn't have the jury able to see all the witness' full faces.
It sounds to me like this is always the case in this courtroom and if so, it wasn't done to do it to her in her case or to her side. My county has a newer justice center, probably 20 or so years old now and yet the courtrooms are small and not all is ideal. Jurors can see the witnesses though but you know what attendees can never see the perp's face and I dont' agree with that either.
Anyhow I don't disagree in this one, jurors should be able to watch every witness, the defendant, and all. But again it does no sound as if they created this set up just for Read. So I'd just say be sure of that before you assume that.
I would say it happens in every case in that county since that is the way their court room is designed. Just because we haven't heard about it doesn't mean it hasn't happened.
Not arguing that part. Just mentioning that it hasn't been brought up yet there even though it's been designed that way and not just that way for this trial that hasn't even started yet.If that's true we need to fix that. Jurors need to be able to see witnesses faces. I didn't take my eyes off one of the defense witnesses for his entire testimony.
Not arguing that part. Just mentioning that it hasn't been brought up yet there even though it's been designed that way and not just that way for this trial that hasn't even started yet.
Because the trial hasn't started yet and they are already complaining about the current layout. I'm sure this is not the only trial getting ready to happen in that county right now or since the issue was mentioned. Otherwise how would they even know?I don't know it's only for this trial. How do you know it isn't?
O/T but while I was watching the witness, all of the others were watching the lawyer.
Because the trial hasn't started yet and they are already complaining about the current layout. I'm sure this is not the only trial getting ready to happen in that county right now or since the issue was mentioned. Otherwise how would they even know?
It is, but your question was how did I know it's that way now.Yes, they're "complaining" that the jurors can't see all of the witness' faces. That's a pretty important part of any trial. If they can't arrange it so all the jurors can see the faces of the witness', the room is too small, and they need to move it.
Did you read the link and look at the pics? Looks pretty old and like permanent builds/structures/jury seats, etc. to me. I don' always look at all links but I did at this one. I don't think they just for goodness sakes rearranged all this for Karen Read. I can't even imagine the reasoning on that one.I would say it happens in every case in that county since that is the way their court room is designed. Just because we haven't heard about it doesn't mean it hasn't happened.
Me either. And pretty much said and just said again the same.Not arguing that part. Just mentioning that it hasn't been brought up yet there even though it's been designed that way and not just that way for this trial that hasn't even started yet.
So think about this. They moved it all and did it just for this trial because as you say how does anyone know it isn't? But then let them see, know, her attorney to get pictures because they were stupid enough to set up the courtroom this way just for Ms. Karen and then let it be known and seen so her side could photo and file about it? This is I will BET you HOW this courtroom is, has been, etc. And who knows, I have no idea maybe this used to be a state or still is that had or often has a six person jury? Isn't Florida one of those if I recall? Some states have that. So now if need 12 it was set up for six to see back in the day.I don't know it's only for this trial. How do you know it isn't?
O/T but while I was watching the witness, all of the others were watching the lawyer.
Lol I should read ahead first. yeah they go to screw her in the layout and setup but then they just find out, enter, take pics etc. This is how it is and any atry, judge, etc. who has ever been in it already knew that. I am trying really hard to be fair in this one but stuff like this is over the top anyone thinking this is some intentional set up for them/her.Because the trial hasn't started yet and they are already complaining about the current layout. I'm sure this is not the only trial getting ready to happen in that county right now or since the issue was mentioned. Otherwise how would they even know?
Well they are in jury selection aren't they and it is due to start. This is really a bit late to now do this but HE77 get some buses, some security and they can all go to the school gym. Or the conference room at the Marriott. I suppose at this point doing that for a trial and all it would entail for everyone ain't going to happen and now I am actually thinking has she and her attorney/s never been in this courtroom throughout? Ahhhh... Getting a different opinion here with some time to think and talk on it...Because the trial hasn't started yet and they are already complaining about the current layout. I'm sure this is not the only trial getting ready to happen in that county right now or since the issue was mentioned. Otherwise how would they even know?
New thought now that I have had a few minutes. Let's not forget tech, are you sure they can't see them on a monitor either at their chair or screens in the courtroom...? I am starting to wonder what is being left out here... Hey that would be a way to remedy it and fast if they don't have such and now another thought, make it even more of a close up on the monitor or screen than even the ones with a viewing line can see.Yes, they're "complaining" that the jurors can't see all of the witness' faces. That's a pretty important part of any trial. If they can't arrange it so all the jurors can see the faces of the witness', the room is too small, and they need to move it.
Yeah I seriously do not want to hurt his feelings but it is like where the DNA thing started in Delphi and then suddenly he was off his own point and topic with it. I worry about him on one hand and at other moments think it is all intentional to drive a a person to act like an out of control freaking out bird or have to say it emu.It is, but your question was how did I know it's that way now.
The Karen Read trial is being held in Norfolk County Superior Court, 650 High St, Dedham, MA 02026.Lol I should read ahead first. yeah they go to screw her in the layout and setup but then they just find out, enter, take pics etc. This is how it is and any atry, judge, etc. who has ever been in it already knew that. I am trying really hard to be fair in this one but stuff like this is over the top anyone thinking this is some intentional set up for them/her.
Not like no time to gripe about it right. Although I dare say they likely knew this too before this more last minute filing by defense about it. However, courtroom layout probably wasn't on top of list when doing an innocence campaing and still hoped all would be delayed, etc. And wasn't. Thus far.
They clearly do need a new courthouse, revamp but revamp won't do it with size these days likely with crime in such cities and areas, so recap and an extra one lol. Get ready taxpayers.. However aren't we in or around the historic Boston MA? I'm sure history matters to a lot of them. I'm ticked the tea party that should have ruled ever after somehow now has us all being taxed to death.
Dumb I know but attempt at some lightness.