Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Guess Who said:
It doesn't matter what entity conducted the interviews. It still was never documented that the witnesses ever heard her say that by any entity. Sure seems like a very important thing to document if it really happened, doesn't it? Like THE most important thing to document.

I have no idea if she was helpful or not since we haven't heard much about her involvement in the investigation.
Click to expand...
"We" haven't heard much? I don't know who we are but I'd agree that you and they have "heard" much, lol.

I don't know why you think "it was never documented".
Whose report do you think should have contained which info but didn't? In other words, who didn't document what and please be specific.
 
Regina said:
"We" haven't heard much? I don't know who we are but I'd agree that you and they have "heard" much, lol.

I don't know why you think "it was never documented".
Whose report do you think should have contained which info but didn't? In other words, who didn't document what and please be specific.
Click to expand...

When an officer is writing an incident report, they must include all relevant facts.
 
Tresir said:
I think they likely just wanted to get out of the blizzard that night and get him to hospital. Any interviews would not have happened till the next day at the very earliest IMO. If they decide to recharge her today, it will be a chance for LE and prosecution to all have a second go at it.
Click to expand...
And still not a word about in any witness statement no matter what day the statement was taken. I'm not sure why what date it was done, IF they were even done, would matter. It still should have been one of the first things notated IF it really happened, wouldn't you think?
 
Tresir said:
What evidence is there that he was killed by another cop?
Click to expand...
Just as much circumstantial evidence it possibly happened that way as it did her hitting him just from everything that wasn't done and by things that were deleted and disposed of by cops and their family members.
 
Last edited:
Tresir said:
Ok. Also the article calls it a "sinister theory" - in other words, not a fact.

I don't think we are going to know much more now till Aug 9th, when the court will hear the defence motion to dismiss the two supposed not guilty charges.
Click to expand...
And by the possible unanimous jury finding her not guilty, it seems the prosecutions theory is also just a theory instead of fact.
 
Regina said:
"We" haven't heard much? I don't know who we are but I'd agree that you and they have "heard" much, lol.

I don't know why you think "it was never documented".
Whose report do you think should have contained which info but didn't? In other words, who didn't document what and please be specific.
Click to expand...
Where is it on ANY witness statement where they should have interviewed each and every person on site that night? Did they even take ANY witness statement at all?
 
Guess Who said:
No. It still did not make it in ANY witness statements as I've said numerous times now.
Click to expand...
It doesn't really matter. It isn't unusual for paramedics to be called into court as an eyewitness after the fact.

Repeating the same thing over and over still doesn't make it matter, really.
 
Guess Who said:
And by the possible unanimous jury finding her not guilty, it seems the prosecutions theory is also just a theory instead of fact.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. The P didn't prove the intent. The jury was only unanimous on the not guilty on the murder charge and leaving the scene. It seems there was a majority who believed she did it but that it was not premeditated, so a possible accident. The D still have the motion in to dismiss those two unanimous charges.
.
 
Guess Who said:
Just as much circumstantial evidence it possibly happened that way as it did her hitting him just from everything that wasn't done and by things that were deleted and disposed of by cops and their family members.
Click to expand...
There was no evidence pointing to anyone else involved AFAIK. Supposition and theories only.
 
This article contains a link to the motion to dismiss. The link doesn't seem to want to load for me but maybe it works stateside.

Article link below.


From the link -

"In a motion to dismiss and affidavits filed after the mistrial, Read's defense said they heard from two jurors and two other informants who said the panel agreed Read was not guilty of two of the three charges. The defense did not identify the sources of their alleged information about the jury."
 
Tresir said:
There was no evidence pointing to anyone else involved AFAIK. Supposition and theories only.
Click to expand...

The Albert's had a dog. He has dog scratches all over his arm. Nobody saw the body on the lawn long after Karen was supposed to have backed into him.
 
www.boston25news.com

25 Investigates: MSP confirm 3 Troopers with connection to Read case now under investigation

25 Investigates has confirmed with Massachusetts State Police that 3 troopers working with the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office are under internal investigation.
www.boston25news.com www.boston25news.com

By Ted Daniel, Boston 25 News
July 23, 2024 at 5:48 pm EDT

DEDHAM, Mass. — 25 Investigates has confirmed with Massachusetts State Police that 3 troopers working with the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office are under internal investigation. All three communicated by text with Trooper Michael Proctor, who sent disparaging messages about Karen Read on his personal cell phone to friends and State Police colleagues. Read was charged in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police officer John O’Keefe. The first trial ended in a hung jury earlier this month. A new trial date has been scheduled for January 2025.

In an email sent exclusively to investigative reporter Ted Daniel, an MSP spokesperson wrote:

“The Massachusetts State Police confirms that Detective Lieutenant Brian Tully, Lieutenant John Fanning and Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik are each the subject of an active internal affairs investigation. The department respectfully declines further comment in fairness to the integrity of the process and pending investigative outcomes. The Troopers remain on full duty at this time.”

Det. Lt. Tully is the Norfolk County State Police Detective Unit Commander. He testified in the Karen Read murder trial in June. Tully discussed the messages sent by Trooper Michael Proctor, who was suspended without pay earlier this month.


Sgt. Yuri Bukhenik is a Mass State Police Detective Sergeant and served as Trooper Proctor’s supervisor. He testified in the trial in June that Read told him she was framed.

Lieutenant John Fanning also works with the Norfolk County D.A.’s office.

State Police would not say what the 3 Troopers are being investigated for, only saying “Generally speaking, the purpose of an internal affairs investigation is to determine compliance with department rules and regulations.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,009
Messages
241,028
Members
969
Latest member
SamiraMill
Back
Top Bottom