Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 

[Cousin Dupree]

 

[Summer_Breeze]

25 Investigates: MSP confirms 2 Troopers with connection to Karen Read case now under investigation

25 Investigates has confirmed with Massachusetts State Police that 2 troopers working with the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office are under internal investigation, a third was investigated and the allegations have been classified as “unfounded.”

www.boston25news.com

By Ted Daniel, Boston 25 News
July 24, 2024 at 7:12 am EDT

DEDHAM, Mass. — 25 Investigates has confirmed with Massachusetts State Police that 2 troopers working with the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office are under internal investigation, a third trooper was investigated and the allegations have been classified as “unfounded.”

All three troopers communicated by text with Trooper Michael Proctor, who sent disparaging messages about Karen Read on his personal cell phone to friends and State Police colleagues. Read was charged in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police officer John O’Keefe. The first trial ended in a hung jury earlier this month. A new trial date has been scheduled for January 2025.

<snip>

The State Police followed up with Boston 25 News later in the evening to say that the investigation into Lt. John Fanning was no longer active.

“The Department’s internal affairs investigation determined that there was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove the allegation that Lieutenant Fanning violated rules and regulations by failing to uphold the responsibilities of a supervisory member. This allegation has been classified as unfounded,” a follow-up statement from the State Police said.

 

[Guess Who]

It doesn't really matter. It isn't unusual for paramedics to be called into court as an eyewitness after the fact.

Repeating the same thing over and over still doesn't make it matter, really.

It matters is the ladies that supposedly heard her say that did not mention it in their witness statements. I'm not even talking about the paramedic.
So again, it either didn't happen or no witness statements were ever taken. It's really just that simple.

 

[Guess Who]

Not necessarily. The P didn't prove the intent. The jury was only unanimous on the not guilty on the murder charge and leaving the scene. It seems there was a majority who believed she did it but that it was not premeditated, so a possible accident. The D still have the motion in to dismiss those two unanimous charges.
.

Majority doesn't count in this because that would mean that on specific count they didn't agree on, the prosecution did not convince all of them. In normal cases the counts they were unanimous on would stand as the verdict on those counts and only the counts they could not agree on would be up for refiling or dismissing. They would not normally be able to retry on the unanimous not guilty verdicts due to double jeopardy.

 

[Guess Who]

There was no evidence pointing to anyone else involved AFAIK. Supposition and theories only.

What real evidence and not circumstantial evidence says she did it?

Too bad a real investigation didn't happen where we possibly could have had solid evidence of what really happened.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

What real evidence and not circumstantial evidence says she did it?

Too bad a real investigation didn't happen where we possibly could have had solid evidence of what really happened.

The Albert's and McCabe's would probably be in jail now.

 

[Tresir]

The Albert's had a dog. He has dog scratches all over his arm. Nobody saw the body on the lawn long after Karen was supposed to have backed into him.

That's just theory though - there is no evidence he was attacked by a dog. Eg. If it were dog scratches and bites, there would be dog DNA.

 

[Tresir]

What real evidence and not circumstantial evidence says she did it?

Too bad a real investigation didn't happen where we possibly could have had solid evidence of what really happened.

AFAIK nothing concrete, thats why it was a mistrial. They can now have a second attempt to get it right hopefully.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

That's just theory though - there is no evidence he was attacked by a dog. Eg. If it were dog scratches and bites, there would be dog DNA.

You'd only have dog DNA if it was submitted by Trooper Proctor. That wasn't going to happen.

 

[Tresir]

What real evidence and not circumstantial evidence says she did it?

Too bad a real investigation didn't happen where we possibly could have had solid evidence of what really happened.

She dropped him off then reversed and was the last person to see him alive that night.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

She dropped him off then reversed and was the last person to see him alive that night.

Prove it. The prosecution couldn't.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

2 more state troopers who were part of the Karen Read case are under investigation, police say

Police say two more state troopers who were part of the Karen Read murder trial over the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend are now facing an internal affairs investigation

abcnews.go.com

 

[Guess Who]

That's just theory though - there is no evidence he was attacked by a dog. Eg. If it were dog scratches and bites, there would be dog DNA.

There is absolutely no evidence he was cut by the taillight, either.

 

[Guess Who]

She dropped him off then reversed and was the last person to see him alive that night.

And where's the actual proof that happened? THAT is why there was a mistrial. The prosecution failed to prove their case.

 

[Guess Who]

2 more state troopers who were part of the Karen Read case are under investigation, police say

Police say two more state troopers who were part of the Karen Read murder trial over the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend are now facing an internal affairs investigation

abcnews.go.com

Read’s lawyers also questioned the sloppiness of the police work: The crime scene was left unsecured for hours; the house, owned by Boston Police Detective Brian Albert, wasn’t searched; bloodstained snow was scooped up with red plastic drinking cups; and a leaf blower was used to clear snow.

 

[Tresir]

You'd only have dog DNA if it was submitted by Trooper Proctor. That wasn't going to happen.

I thought they did check for DNA on the broken glass and the arm wound.

 

[Tresir]

And where's the actual proof that happened? THAT is why there was a mistrial. The prosecution failed to prove their case.

They analysed it from the vehicles computer IIRC. Remember the 24 mph reversing?

 

[Cousin Dupree]

I thought they did check for DNA on the broken glass and the arm wound.

That was brought to the scene later.

 

[Guess Who]

I thought they did check for DNA on the broken glass and the arm wound.

They supposedly did and did not find ANY of his tissue or blood on any of the pieces and no pieces in the arm wound, which is another strike against him actually being hit by the tail light.

 

[Guess Who]

They analysed it from the vehicles computer IIRC. Remember the 24 mph reversing?

I can guarantee you that the defense will have a better understanding now of what that meant and I'm fairly certain that it will prove differently, just like the deleted 2am search that the prosecution says never happened.