Adding "bloody" when that was never said. There are also some other questionable things in the Frank's Memo." The "bloody" thing being one of them. Why did the cops lie about that? The prosecution never challenged that as being untrue.
I bring things up just like others dismiss them because he was arrested, so that means he's guilty.
After thinking about RL, I think that because he died, they couldn't interview him anymore. They couldn't catch him in conflicting stories.so they can't present much evidence, except that he lied to cover the time the kids were killed.
What's disturbing is nobody here seems to care about his lying so it would appear he had an alibi.
People here are convinced he did it, any contradictory evidence be darned.
There was the whole cat hair thing that some were pushing, but it turned out to be untrue.
All I want is for people to open their minds. I have done so. If you don't know that it's because people haven't read all of my posts.
I don't think he is guilty just be because he was "arrested". There is his bullet, his gun, his confessions, and more.
As to the bloody, also been discussed back when to no end and I just also talked of it not far above here last night. This happens all of the time. You bring something up that I just already addressed just last night... ??
Who is RL? He is a non anything even to the DEFENSE. I am about to forget him for good. His lying also has been covered to no end. NONE of this is new and NONE of it has not previously been discussed over and over and over.
I was never overboard on the cat hair thing and I don't think anything has been shown to be true or untrue with that or anything else not know for certain.
You have opened your mind? When was that? I see no such thing. You are stuck and can look at nothing but the same old things that were HOW long ago and nothing since.
Again the D does not even touch on him or use him. Logic dictates there is a real reason for that. Yet they brought up KK.
You know, there probably is some RL did it fan page somewhere.... In all jest maybe you want to go find it or or already on it.
By the way, we did not know about RA prior, but many times I think someone guilty BEFORE they are ever arrested in many a case LOL and so an arrest does not determine at all what I think.
I'm about to forget forever who RL is. Talk to someone else about it. We've all already been through it ALL.
His dying did not stop them proceeding with him, what are you talking of? They were NOT proceeding with him.
The case is moving some and with any luck there will also be trial now in pretty short order. You talk of people going with something because there was an "arrest". Uhm no, there's been plenty since the arrest and now more finally coming out.
You don't open your mind. You have not even talked about new info and if you do, it is with blinders that only try to fit it into your beliefs when not a thing about it fits nor is anyone else trying to do so. But I've said, go ahead, that's your right.
RL no longer exists to me and from here on out, that is where I am going. You do nothing but constantly try to drag people back to the same old. Try something new and get stuck on the Os. I wouldn't like that much either but at least it would be a change of pace and at this point might actually seem like a breath of fresh air. I mean I don't want that either but the other thing has been beat to death so bad it should have it's own RL thread for you.
I've tried to yet again nice about it and even ask that you may be at least discuss the new stuff because there are some new "pages" now in this case but you won''t. And again, your right.
Maybe I'l find a new spot or something on this one. OH I already have more than once, taken a break from this and gone elsewhere to Tom, etc. where it is not always the same old.
Tie RA to RL for me please? or RL to the Os for me? Or anything? Remove RA from the trails and bridge? TIE them. Not that the Os were there either but MAKE it WORK. It doesn't and it's ridiculous.
I had a long post (I think, not sure but think I posted it) in the last week or so of why RL lied. He was drinking and driving. THAT too has been covered many, many, many times. He is NOT BG and that is so obvious it is beyond obvious.
The VOICE is RA and WHO sent the girls "down the hill" is most definitely the murderer or involved. By the way my being convinced of that does NOT come from the fact he was "arrested". Arrest has never had a thing to do with who I feel is guilty in cases as many a time I am there BEFORE that. Not here of course because we never knew of RA's existence but my being convinced has to do with a lot more than just his arrest.
This isn't an attack, it is meant to discuss and respond to your such accusations.
I've said before too, MORE THAN ONCE, that I don't always have the popular opinion by a long shot. I STAY out of Read for the most part because mine does not match what most of the rest of you think,. It matches a lot on some of the people but not the reasons for it, etc. HERE your opinion is not the popular one and I don't believe anyone shares it. And you are welcome to it. But there is a different between having a different one and recognizing that and trying to repeatedly stuff yours down everyone else's throat and take the thread constantly to it.
Do I go there and stay and do that? I think it's been at least a month and I think I may have went in and said what I thought of how it turned out or some such and that's it.
When the whole internet of crime things was saturated with her sh*t and one could find little else on, I watched enough, not always by choice and at least found that the whole world doesn't think that way and you can too with RL. I doubt much of it but there are some out there.
You know you could go try to see if Barb McDonald has a channel. I wouldn't know.
And if I EVER get time I am going to ask Linda what she thinks today re I forget his name. Ron somebody... See I'm already starting to erase him for good.
LOL.
I am not positive yet, but I am pretty sure the box cutter thing RA knew but could never have known unless the killer himself. P said in these hearings which imo typical news has not covered fully AT ALL that some of these confessions had facts in them only the killer could know and I think that was one example and they have more. They have held very close to the vest but now we are in pretrial hearings and some has to come out so they gave an example.
Again tie now I have totally forgot his name that old dude you think was BG to RA.
RA totally panicked over the evidence. And his defense when they finally got around to realizing they messed up leaving him languish then did as well to cover their butts and are trying to get it ALL thrown out.
Blinders. You don't even entertain anything else nor do you take anything new in without trying to fit it to your mold.
Anyhow, this is my first anything on waking up. Not coffeed as this was how it started.
You know despite what anyone thinks of any case and if they differ, going on and on and beating the same old drum with nothing new and repeating the same old things and links does what? Absolutely nothing except irritate.
Maybe there's something new on a what's his name again? Forum but I doubt it. I think you've brought all there is and we have ALL heard it, seen it, etc.
ON the flip side aside from HIS gun, RA appeared to have used a box cutter. OH MY that is NEW. But just ignore that, don't even discuss it. Heck you haven't even tried yet to acknowledge that or tie it to whatever his name is. It's like nothing was ever said about such or anything else in the hearings although you kept waiting for confessions and other things and still are to tie in what's his name.
And you, who go on about people wrongfully convicted, are doing such with him. Take a GOOD LOOK which you will NOT but you are.
I don't think you even read anything here unless it is a response to you and even then you don't fully.
I get little time and yet if I haven't read something try to say so, or looked at a link, etc.
I need to go make some coffee. Should have done so first.
Peace and hugs. And more than one has said it here many, many, many times. I am done with it.
en.wikipedia.org
www.crimewatchers.net
