CO SUZANNE MORPHEW: Missing from Chaffee County, CO - 10 May 2020 - Age 49 *Found Deceased*

A Chaffee County woman is missing after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned, sparking a search involving more than 100 emergency personnel.

The Chaffee County Communications Center received a report on Sunday at 5:46 p.m. regarding a missing woman in the area of County Road 225 and West Highway 50.


Anybody who has information on Morphew’s whereabouts is asked to call the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office at 719-539-2596 or Chaffee County Crime Stoppers at 719-539-2599.


1589412136362.png

www.thedenverchannel.com

Chaffee County woman missing since Sunday after neighbor said she went out for bike ride

A woman is missing after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned, sparking a search involving more than 100 emergency personnel.
www.thedenverchannel.com www.thedenverchannel.com
edited by staff to add media link
www.crimewatchers.net

SUZANNE MORPHEW is still #missing from Mayesville, CO. Her husband was arrested in 2021 for her murder!

A Chaffee County woman is still missing from Colorado after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned in May of 2020.
www.crimewatchers.net www.crimewatchers.net
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
Guess Who said:
Was anything reported missing? We know Barry would have an insurance claim on any of that.
Click to expand...
I don't know the answer to that. I don't necessarily think they would release that info anyway. If she had cash or credit cards on her at the time or in the car. You mentioned a discarded water bottle - where did you hear about that? I thought she used a camelback, which was found in the car, wasn't it?
 
Tresir said:
I don't know the answer to that. I don't necessarily think they would release that info anyway. If she had cash or credit cards on her at the time or in the car. You mentioned a discarded water bottle - where did you hear about that? I thought she used a camelback, which was found in the car, wasn't it?
Click to expand...
That's a water bottle.
 
Tresir said:
So they got a partial familial match on the glovebox DNA which led to the Az perp eventually but they couldn't get an actual sample from him. Is that it?
Click to expand...
That's my understanding.

Just because he lawyered up, if they were any kind of confident it belonged to him, they would get a court order for it. This tells me that they probably weren't so confident and need more proof before getting a court order.
 
Guess Who said:
That's my understanding.

Just because he lawyered up, if they were any kind of confident it belonged to him, they would get a court order for it. This tells me that they probably weren't so confident and need more proof before getting a court order.
Click to expand...
Can the CBI have that authority in another state? This would mean a federal crime if he was in another state. Wouldn't they have to extradite etc like they did with the Daybells?
 
Guess Who said:
Held a gun to her and only get into her glove box for what?
Click to expand...

I don't know. That's the problem. I can't explain the DNA, you and the police can't deny it exists. I need to know how it got there and from whom.

Tresir said:
LE are the ones to answer all this. We can only speculate. Maybe he had gloves on but sneezed on the glove box, left hair, spit whatever.
Click to expand...

That makes sense.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
I don't know. That's the problem. I can't explain the DNA, you and the police can't deny it exists. I need to know how it got there and from whom.



That makes sense.
Click to expand...
If it doesn't match the DNA on the bike and helmet, then it seems pretty irrelevant since the defense seems to be going with something happening to her on her bike. But yes, it would certainly help finding out who it belongs to. If they are confident it's him, we will be seeing a search warrant at any time now. Then they can get his alibi.
 
Guess Who said:
If it doesn't match the DNA on the bike and helmet, then it seems pretty irrelevant since the defense seems to be going with something happening to her on her bike. But yes, it would certainly help finding out who it belongs to. If they are confident it's him, we will be seeing a search warrant at any time now. Then they can get his alibi.
Click to expand...
Both sides have to go with the evidence - I think the partial match on the glovebox to a sexual offender is better than no match on the DNA on the bike and helmet.
 
Tresir said:
Both sides have to go with the evidence - I think the partial match on the glovebox to a sexual offender is better than no match on the DNA on the bike and helmet.
Click to expand...
im on the side of Barry doing it, but I hope they don't refile charges on him until this is resolved, because, yes, they should go with the evidence, no matter where it leads. They also need to know who this person is and verify that it is thet same offender and get him off the street, even if he is not connected to this case at all. This is why a lot of cases get lost. It takes only one person to think that it might just have possibly been somebody else. They need to be able to quash any doubt. Hopefully finding her will answer a lot more questions for them. Hopefully they have a lot more connections than they have let us aware of.
 
I'm afraid that they've got Barry tried and convicted in their minds. If the DNA is the same everywhere then it'll cause a HUGE problem for them. If that dude from Arizona's DNA is on her body then there might be some movement, but it's always very difficult for Prosecutors to admit they were wrong.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
I'm afraid that they've got Barry tried and convicted in their minds. If the DNA is the same everywhere then it'll cause a HUGE problem for them. If that dude from Arizona's DNA is on her body then there might be some movement, but it's always very difficult for Prosecutors to admit they were wrong.
Click to expand...
But they were at least smart enough to drop the charges when they did, the way they did. They can always refile them.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
I'm afraid that they've got Barry tried and convicted in their minds. If the DNA is the same everywhere then it'll cause a HUGE problem for them. If that dude from Arizona's DNA is on her body then there might be some movement, but it's always very difficult for Prosecutors to admit they were wrong.
Click to expand...
I just don't want to see another David Camm fiasco.
 
Wow was this one apparently active today. I really am unhappy that no way will life allow me to catch up n what is top case for me that has been largely inactive until recently. Going to have to wait to look at all the posts. I do hope we are off any mountain lion thought with Suzanne. Lion did not take her to Moffat and "Barry" her. She did not take herself there and "Barry" herself.

With Edna, who knows but I doubt it there too. Don't know what the pages of posts are about and have no time, HOPE to catch up, but hoping we can agree that a mountain lion as re Suzanne is a moot point?
 
GrandmaBear said:
Wow was this one apparently active today. I really am unhappy that no way will life allow me to catch up n what is top case for me that has been largely inactive until recently. Going to have to wait to look at all the posts. I do hope we are off any mountain lion thought with Suzanne. Lion did not take her to Moffat and "Barry" her. She did not take herself there and "Barry" herself.

With Edna, who knows but I doubt it there too. Don't know what the pages of posts are about and have no time, HOPE to catch up, but hoping we can agree that a mountain lion as re Suzanne is a moot point?
Click to expand...
Most of the discussion was about the partial DNA match to an out of state offender. You probably don't need to catch up on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,017
Messages
242,495
Members
974
Latest member
elimortonslywir
Back
Top Bottom