Hello and welcome! I'm glad you joined the discussion!
There are some thoughts about the age difference all over social media, and Downunder Dan released a video about it. He seems to be a very kind person, but I don't know that I agree with his take as he seems to have different information on the age difference, too. Here's the video:
I am aware of a sexual child abuse case that happened in my state about 20 years ago where a 16 year old abused a half sister who was 5 or 6 years old by touching her inappropriately. I was told by one of the parties involved that the person working for LE in the case, a social worker, said that it's more and more common in blended family situations that most people realize, and most of the occurrences are unreported. In the case I was privy to, one of the parents wanted charges brought and LE said that if the age difference was more than 4 years it is a sexual abuse case. Since this offender was 16 years old, they didn't have to register as a SO. The part of this case with JL that makes me curious is if there is a law that since the accused JL was a minor at the time and ends up to be guilty, would he have to register as SO because he's an adult today, 30 years later?
You're so right, there is a lot of evidence to come out and a lot of questions to be answered. But, in this case, there are communications between JL and the person who is accusing him of the worst of sexual offenses and I think that's why his team has walked away from him. And personally, that's why I don't want anything to do with him, either.
It's not easy to watch someone that you think is a hero fall down this hard. His past bad acts sure have ruined a lot of lives, starting with the girl(s) who were harmed.